Suppr超能文献

针对患有多种疾病的患者基于需求的生活质量测量框架的概念化。

Conceptualisation of a measurement framework for Needs-based Quality of Life among patients with multimorbidity.

作者信息

Bissenbakker Kristine, Møller Anne, Brodersen John Brandt, Jønsson Alexandra Brandt Ryborg

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice in Copenhagen, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

The Research Unit for General Practice in Region Zealand, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 27;6(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00489-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is both an individual and societal problem. For society, patients with multimorbidity increase healthcare costs. For the individual, living with multimorbidity is complex, and there is an inverse relationship between a patient's Quality of Life (QoL) and their number of chronic conditions. Numerous intervention studies target these problems, yet there is no multimorbidity-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) developed specifically for this group with adequate measurement properties to assess QoL. This study explores what overall needs regarding QoL are affected by living with multimorbidity through qualitative interviews. With this, we conceptualise Needs-based QoL specifically for this group, ensuring high content validity (regarding relevance and comprehensiveness) of using the Needs-based approach to measure their QoL. This is essential as this preliminary study leads to the development of the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ), a PROM measuring QoL among patients with multimorbidity.

METHODS

This study draws upon qualitative interviews with fifteen patients with multimorbidity based on a semi-structured interview guide following the Needs-based approach. This approach allowed the patients to cover needs relevant for their QoL in relation to the complexities of living with multimorbidity. The transcribed interviews were thematically analysed, inspired by Braun and Clarke's reflexive approach.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews resulted in the construction of six intertwined domains relevant to patients with multimorbidity, covering their Needs-based QoL; "Physical ability", "Self-determination", "Security", "Partner and social life", "Self-image", and "Personal finances". "Physical limitations" and "Personal finances" were stated as core needs implicating the other domains.

CONCLUSION

This study shows six intertwined overall domains relevant for patients with multimorbidity regarding their Needs-based QoL; "Physical ability", "Self-determination", "Security", "Partner and social life", "Self-image", and "Personal finances". These needs are relevant in a Danish context, with a generally high standard of living. Based on this conceptual framework of Need-based QoL for patients with multimorbidity, we will develop items for a new patient-reported outcome measure called the MMQ.

摘要

背景

多重疾病既是个人问题,也是社会问题。对社会而言,患有多重疾病的患者会增加医疗成本。对个人来说,患有多重疾病的生活很复杂,患者的生活质量(QoL)与他们的慢性病数量呈负相关。许多干预研究针对这些问题,但尚未开发出专门针对该群体的、具有足够测量属性以评估生活质量的多重疾病特定患者报告结局测量指标(PROM)。本研究通过定性访谈探讨了患有多重疾病的生活对生活质量的总体需求有哪些影响。据此,我们专门为该群体概念化了基于需求的生活质量,确保使用基于需求的方法来测量他们的生活质量具有较高的内容效度(在相关性和全面性方面)。这至关重要,因为这项初步研究促成了多重疾病问卷(MMQ)的开发,这是一种测量多重疾病患者生活质量的PROM。

方法

本研究基于半结构化访谈指南,采用基于需求的方法对15名患有多重疾病的患者进行定性访谈。这种方法使患者能够涵盖与患有多重疾病的复杂生活相关的、对其生活质量至关重要的需求。转录后的访谈采用主题分析法进行分析,灵感来源于布劳恩和克拉克的反思性方法。

结果

对访谈的分析得出了与患有多重疾病的患者相关的六个相互交织的领域,涵盖了他们基于需求的生活质量;“身体能力”、“自主决定权”、“安全感”、“伴侣与社交生活”、“自我形象”和“个人财务”。“身体限制”和“个人财务”被认为是涉及其他领域的核心需求。

结论

本研究表明,对于患有多重疾病的患者,基于需求的生活质量有六个相互交织的总体领域;“身体能力”、“自主决定权”、“安全感”、“伴侣与社交生活”、“自我形象”和“个人财务”。在丹麦这样生活水平普遍较高的背景下,这些需求具有相关性。基于这个针对患有多重疾病患者的基于需求的生活质量概念框架,我们将为一种名为MMQ的新的患者报告结局测量指标开发项目。

相似文献

1
Conceptualisation of a measurement framework for Needs-based Quality of Life among patients with multimorbidity.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 27;6(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00489-0.
4
Identifying subgroups of persons with multimorbidity based on their needs for care and support.
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1069-6.
5
Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 20;2:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-51.
6
A qualitative exploration of the content and face validity of preference-based measures within the context of dementia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 11;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01425-w.
8

引用本文的文献

1
3
Development of a PROM to measure patient-centredness in chronic care consultations in primary care.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jan 8;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02327-x.

本文引用的文献

2
WASP (write a scientific paper): Sampling in qualitative research.
Early Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;133:69-71. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
3
A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm).
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):132-138. doi: 10.1370/afm.2178.
4
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
Patient-reported outcomes in multimorbidity intervention research: A scoping review.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
6
Multi-morbidity: A patient perspective on navigating the health care system and everyday life.
Chronic Illn. 2018 Dec;14(4):271-282. doi: 10.1177/1742395317731607. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
7
Patient-experienced burden of treatment in patients with multimorbidity - A systematic review of qualitative data.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179916. eCollection 2017.
8
Antiviral agents for infectious mononucleosis (glandular fever).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 8;12(12):CD011487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011487.pub2.
10
Co-calibrating quality-of-life scores from three pulmonary disorders: implications for comparative-effectiveness research.
J Med Econ. 2016 Jun;19(6):596-603. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1148700. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验