• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图片与文字的水平位置如何影响产品评价?基于左右位置效应。

How Does the Horizontal Position of Pictures and Text Affect Product Evaluation? Based on Left and Right Position Effect.

作者信息

Huang Zan, Du Yingjue, Xu Feifei, Hu Chuming

机构信息

School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Research Institute on Brand Innovation and Development of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:841480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841480. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841480
PMID:35899009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9311378/
Abstract

Due to the untouchability of online shopping environment, image and text description, as two main ways of product information display, are important indicators for consumers to evaluate products. However, few studies have discussed the synergistic effects of image and text information on consumers. In the present study, in conjunction with the left-right position effect, we examine the expectation that horizontal placement of visual stimuli in different directions has a strong influence on consumers' product evaluation preferences. This implicit assumption is based on consumers' unconscious psychological need for closure when processing information. The authors conducted three studies to investigate the relative effects of image information and text statements at different locations in online shopping pages on consumer product evaluations. The results show that: (1) when the evaluation object is a search product, compared with the display mode of left text-right image, the display mode of left image-right text plays a more significant role in consumer product evaluation. The results of experiential products were just the opposite. The way of presenting the text declaration on the left and image on the right has a stronger impact on consumers' evaluation preference for experiential products (Study 1 and Study 3). (2) The difference in consumers' evaluation mode of different presentation sequences based on product attributes is driven by their visual information processing fluency (Study 2). These preferences are robust, and it is worth noting that only the order of graphic presentation has no significant influence on consumer product evaluation preference.

摘要

由于网络购物环境、商品图片和文字描述的不可触摸性,图片和文字描述作为产品信息展示的两种主要方式,是消费者评估产品的重要指标。然而,很少有研究探讨图片和文字信息对消费者的协同效应。在本研究中,结合左右位置效应,我们检验了一种预期,即视觉刺激在不同方向上的水平放置对消费者的产品评估偏好有很大影响。这种隐含的假设是基于消费者在处理信息时对闭合的无意识心理需求。作者进行了三项研究,以调查网络购物页面中不同位置的图片信息和文字陈述对消费者产品评估的相对影响。结果表明:(1)当评估对象是搜索类产品时,与左文字右图片的展示模式相比,左图片右文字的展示模式在消费者产品评估中发挥着更显著的作用。体验类产品的结果则相反。左文字右图片的呈现方式对消费者对体验类产品的评估偏好有更强的影响(研究1和研究3)。(2)消费者基于产品属性对不同呈现顺序的评估模式差异是由他们的视觉信息处理流畅性驱动的(研究2)。这些偏好是稳健的,值得注意的是,只有图形呈现的顺序对消费者产品评估偏好没有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/3dedd9be80ec/fpsyg-13-841480-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/5dbbb2dbc902/fpsyg-13-841480-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/3cfb914f0db6/fpsyg-13-841480-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/324b5ae7c8a4/fpsyg-13-841480-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/3dedd9be80ec/fpsyg-13-841480-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/5dbbb2dbc902/fpsyg-13-841480-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/3cfb914f0db6/fpsyg-13-841480-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/324b5ae7c8a4/fpsyg-13-841480-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa1/9311378/3dedd9be80ec/fpsyg-13-841480-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
How Does the Horizontal Position of Pictures and Text Affect Product Evaluation? Based on Left and Right Position Effect.图片与文字的水平位置如何影响产品评价?基于左右位置效应。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:841480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841480. eCollection 2022.
2
Influences of viewing angle, product position, and consumers' physical characteristics on their Kansei images.视角、产品位置和消费者身体特征对感性意象的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276421. eCollection 2022.
3
Liking Product Landscape: Going Deeper into Understanding Consumers' Hedonic Evaluations.喜爱产品全景:深入理解消费者的享乐评价
Foods. 2019 Oct 9;8(10):461. doi: 10.3390/foods8100461.
4
How Strong Is Your Coffee? The Influence of Visual Metaphors and Textual Claims on Consumers' Flavor Perception and Product Evaluation.你的咖啡有多浓?视觉隐喻和文字描述对消费者风味感知及产品评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 5;9:53. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00053. eCollection 2018.
5
"Guess You Like It" - How personalized recommendation timing and product type influence consumers' acceptance: An ERP study.“猜你喜欢”——个性化推荐时机与产品类型如何影响消费者接受度:一项ERP研究
Neurosci Lett. 2023 Jun 11;807:137261. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137261. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
The Effect of Product Image Dynamism on Purchase Intention for Online Aquatic Product Shopping: An EEG Study.产品形象动态性对在线水产品购物购买意愿的影响:一项脑电图研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jun 15;14:759-768. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S313742. eCollection 2021.
7
How the smart product attributes influence consumer adoption intention.智能产品属性如何影响消费者的采用意愿。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1090200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1090200. eCollection 2023.
8
A Matching Study on the Influence of Advertised Information Expression and Product Type on Consumer Purchase Intention.广告信息表达与产品类型对消费者购买意愿影响的匹配性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:859959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859959. eCollection 2022.
9
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.社交商务平台上消费者的决策过程:在线信任、感知风险与购买意愿
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020.
10
The Influence of Social Crowding on Consumers' Preference for Green Products.社会拥挤对消费者绿色产品偏好的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:832869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832869. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of the findings and theories on surface size effects on visual attention.关于表面大小对视觉注意力影响的研究结果与理论综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 9;4:902. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00902.
2
Sealing the emotions genie: the effects of physical enclosure on psychological closure.封印情感精灵:物理封闭对心理封闭的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1047-50. doi: 10.1177/0956797610376653. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
3
Thinking about the future moves attention to the right.思考未来会将注意力转向右侧。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):17-24. doi: 10.1037/a0017176.
4
An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.反应编码的时空关联效应:理解时间的认知表征
Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):501-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.011. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
5
Time (also) flies from left to right.时间也从左向右飞逝。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):512-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03194099.
6
Incomplete inhibition of emotion in specific autobiographical memories.特定自传体记忆中情绪抑制不完整。
Memory. 2007 May;15(4):375-89. doi: 10.1080/09658210701276850.
7
Psychological closure as a memory phenomenon.作为一种记忆现象的心理闭合。
Memory. 2005 Aug;13(6):574-93. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000241.
8
The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading.返回抑制中的从左到右偏向是由于阅读方向。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):15-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00774.x.
9
Lateral biases in aesthetic preferences: pictorial dimensions and neural mechanisms.审美偏好中的侧向偏差:图像维度与神经机制。
Laterality. 1997;2(2):155-75. doi: 10.1080/713754266.
10
Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect.心情放松会使面带微笑:加工促进引发积极情感的心理生理学证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):989-1000.