Mahallawi Waleed, Ibrahim Nadir
Medical Laboratory Technology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 11;9:923715. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923715. eCollection 2022.
Limited information is currently available regarding the global incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections prior to the declaration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which may result in improper conclusions regarding the timing of viral transmission.
We investigated the presence of specific antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 in archived serum samples that were collected from 478 healthy blood donors and patients in Madinah, Saudi Arabia, between October 2019 and January 2020. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies. In addition, rheumatoid factor (RF) and urea dissociation tests were performed in all samples, which showed seropositivity for the SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody. Additionally, Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) targeting the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein were performed to confirm the seropositivity of the samples.
Overall, 20 (4.18%) serum samples were detected by ELISA to have SARS-CoV-2 IgG or IgM antibodies. Of these, 12 (2.51%) samples were positive for IgM antibody, and 8 (1.67%) were positive for IgG antibody. The 12 samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody were subjected to RF and urea dissociation tests, and all samples were RF-negative. The ELISA results were negative for 7 (58.33%) samples when subjected to urea dissociation prior to ELISA, whereas the other 5 (41.67%) samples remained positive. These 5 samples remained positive for the anti-S RBD IgG antibody in the CLIA. In addition, 3 of the 8 samples with IgG positivity according to the ELISA remained positive in the CLIA. After reviewing their data, we discovered that the 8 CLIA-confirmed positive samples were obtained from returned travellers who had visited China during the 4-week period immediately preceding blood donation.
In conclusion, we found evidence to support the early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 among persons who visited China a few months prior to the pandemic declaration. These results can be used to better define the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections before the COVID-19 pandemic declaration. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in individuals before the pandemic was declared in China could rewrite the pre-pandemic timeline.
关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行宣布之前严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的全球发病率,目前可获得的信息有限,这可能导致关于病毒传播时间的结论不准确。
我们调查了2019年10月至2020年1月期间从沙特阿拉伯麦地那的478名健康献血者和患者收集的存档血清样本中针对SARS-CoV-2受体结合域(RBD)的特异性抗体的存在情况。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)来检测SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG抗体。此外,对所有SARS-CoV-2 IgM抗体呈血清阳性的样本进行类风湿因子(RF)和尿素解离试验。另外,进行针对SARS-CoV-2刺突(S)蛋白RBD的化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)以确认样本的血清阳性。
总体而言,ELISA检测发现20份(4.18%)血清样本含有SARS-CoV-2 IgG或IgM抗体。其中,12份(2.51%)样本IgM抗体呈阳性,8份(1.67%)样本IgG抗体呈阳性。对12份SARS-CoV-2 IgM抗体呈阳性的样本进行RF和尿素解离试验,所有样本RF均为阴性。在ELISA检测前进行尿素解离时,7份(58.33%)样本的ELISA结果为阴性,而其他5份(41.67%)样本仍为阳性。这5份样本在CLIA检测中抗S RBD IgG抗体仍为阳性。此外,根据ELISA检测IgG呈阳性的8份样本中有3份在CLIA检测中仍为阳性。在审查他们的数据后,我们发现8份经CLIA确认呈阳性的样本是从在献血前4周内去过中国的回国旅行者中获得的。
总之,我们发现有证据支持SARS-CoV-2在大流行宣布前几个月去过中国的人群中早期传播。这些结果可用于更好地界定COVID-19大流行宣布之前SARS-CoV-2感染的传播情况。在中国宣布大流行之前在个体中检测到SARS-CoV-2抗体可能会改写大流行前的时间线。