Basit Raja Haseeb, Wiseman Jessica, Chowdhury Farhana, Chari Divya Maitreyi
Bradford Royal infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire; Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; Neural Tissue Engineering Keele Group, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Neural Regen Res. 2023 Feb;18(2):289-292. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.346465.
Traumatic brain injuries are serious clinical incidents associated with some of the poorest outcomes in neurological practice. Coupled with the limited regenerative capacity of the brain, this has significant implications for patients, carers, and healthcare systems, and the requirement for life-long care in some cases. Clinical treatment currently focuses on limiting the initial neural damage with long-term care/support from multidisciplinary teams. Therapies targeting neuroprotection and neural regeneration are not currently available but are the focus of intensive research. Biomaterial-based interventions are gaining popularity for a range of applications including biomolecule and drug delivery, and to function as cellular scaffolds. Experimental investigations into the development of such novel therapeutics for traumatic brain injury will be critically underpinned by the availability of appropriate high throughput, facile, ethically viable, and pathomimetic biological model systems. This represents a significant challenge for researchers given the pathological complexity of traumatic brain injury. Specifically, there is a concerted post-injury response mounted by multiple neural cell types which includes microglial activation and astroglial scarring with the expression of a range of growth inhibitory molecules and cytokines in the lesion environment. Here, we review common models used for the study of traumatic brain injury (ranging from live animal models to in vitro systems), focusing on penetrating traumatic brain injury models. We discuss their relative advantages and drawbacks for the developmental testing of biomaterial-based therapies.
创伤性脑损伤是严重的临床事件,与神经科实践中一些最差的预后相关。再加上大脑有限的再生能力,这对患者、护理人员和医疗保健系统都有重大影响,在某些情况下还需要终身护理。目前的临床治疗重点是在多学科团队的长期护理/支持下限制初始神经损伤。目前尚无针对神经保护和神经再生的疗法,但这是深入研究的重点。基于生物材料的干预措施在包括生物分子和药物递送以及作为细胞支架等一系列应用中越来越受欢迎。对于创伤性脑损伤这种新型疗法的开发,实验研究将在合适的高通量、简便、符合伦理且模拟病理的生物模型系统的支持下至关重要。鉴于创伤性脑损伤的病理复杂性,这对研究人员来说是一项重大挑战。具体而言,多种神经细胞类型在损伤后会产生协同反应,包括小胶质细胞活化和星形胶质细胞瘢痕形成,并在损伤环境中表达一系列生长抑制分子和细胞因子。在此,我们综述用于研究创伤性脑损伤的常见模型(从活体动物模型到体外系统),重点关注穿透性创伤性脑损伤模型。我们讨论它们在基于生物材料的疗法的开发测试中的相对优缺点。