• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对一种临床风险评分模型进行外部验证,以预测 COVID-19 患者的住院和院内死亡率。

External validation of a clinical risk score to predict hospital admission and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.

机构信息

Internal Medicine Department, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):78-86. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1828616. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2020.1828616
PMID:32997542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7877986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospital admission or at high-risk of in-hospital mortality is essential to guide patient triage and to provide timely treatment for higher risk hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A retrospective multi-centre (8 hospital) cohort at Beaumont Health, Michigan, USA, reporting on COVID-19 patients diagnosed between 1 March and 1 April 2020 was used for score validation. The COVID-19 Risk of Complications Score was automatically computed by the EHR. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to predict hospital admission and in-hospital mortality using individual variables constituting the score. Validation was performed using both discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

Compared to Green scores, Yellow Scores (OR: 5.72) and Red Scores (OR: 19.1) had significantly higher odds of admission (both  < .0001). Similarly, Yellow Scores (OR: 4.73) and Red Scores (OR: 13.3) had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality than Green Scores (both  < .0001). The cross-validated C-Statistics for the external validation cohort showed good discrimination for both hospital admission ( = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.81)) and in-hospital mortality ( = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78)).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 Risk of Complications Score predicts the need for hospital admission and in-hospital mortality patients with COVID-19. Key points: Can an electronic health record generated risk score predict the risk of hospital admission and in-hospital mortality in patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? In both validation cohorts of 2,025 and 1,290 COVID-19, the cross-validated C-Statistics showed good discrimination for both hospital admission (C = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.81)) and in-hospital mortality (C = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78)), respectively. The COVID-19 Risk of Complications Score may help predict the need for hospital admission if a patient contracts SARS-CoV-2 infection and in-hospital mortality for a hospitalized patient with COVID-19.

摘要

背景

识别需要住院或有院内高死亡率风险的新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者对于指导患者分诊和为高风险住院患者及时治疗至关重要。

方法

美国密歇根州 Beaumont Health 的一项回顾性多中心(8 家医院)队列研究报告了 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 4 月 1 日期间确诊的 COVID-19 患者,用于评分验证。COVID-19 并发症风险评分由电子病历自动计算。使用构成评分的个体变量构建预测住院和院内死亡率的多变量逻辑回归模型。使用判别和校准进行验证。

结果

与 Green 评分相比,Yellow 评分(OR:5.72)和 Red 评分(OR:19.1)的住院可能性显著更高(均 < .0001)。同样,Yellow 评分(OR:4.73)和 Red 评分(OR:13.3)的院内死亡率也显著高于 Green 评分(均 < .0001)。外部验证队列的交叉验证 C-统计量显示,住院和院内死亡率的判别能力均较好(分别为 = 0.79(95%CI:0.77-0.81)和 = 0.75(95%CI:0.71-0.78))。

结论

COVID-19 并发症风险评分可预测 COVID-19 患者住院和院内死亡的需求。

关键点

电子病历生成的风险评分能否预测冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者住院和院内死亡的风险?在 2025 例和 1290 例 COVID-19 的两个验证队列中,交叉验证的 C 统计量显示,住院(C=0.79(95%CI:0.77-0.81))和院内死亡率(C=0.75(95%CI:0.71-0.78))的判别能力均较好。COVID-19 并发症风险评分可能有助于预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的住院需求和 COVID-19 住院患者的院内死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/f843c2e090f2/IANN_A_1828616_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/96c5c14760ec/IANN_A_1828616_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/c3dec9bd2a71/IANN_A_1828616_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/f843c2e090f2/IANN_A_1828616_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/96c5c14760ec/IANN_A_1828616_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/c3dec9bd2a71/IANN_A_1828616_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2730/7877986/f843c2e090f2/IANN_A_1828616_F0003_B.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of a clinical risk score to predict hospital admission and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.对一种临床风险评分模型进行外部验证,以预测 COVID-19 患者的住院和院内死亡率。
Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):78-86. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1828616. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study.成人因冠状病毒 19 住院和死亡风险的生存风险预测算法(QCOVID):全国推导和验证队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3731.
3
Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.开发和验证一种临床风险评分,以预测 COVID-19 住院患者发生危重症的情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033.
4
Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 in New York City: Model Development and Validation.机器学习预测纽约市新冠肺炎患者队列中的死亡率和危急事件:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e24018. doi: 10.2196/24018.
5
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score.利用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议对因 COVID-19 住院的患者进行风险分层:4C 死亡率评分的制定和验证。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3339.
6
Development and external validation of a prediction risk model for short-term mortality among hospitalized U.S. COVID-19 patients: A proposal for the COVID-AID risk tool.美国住院 COVID-19 患者短期死亡率预测风险模型的开发和外部验证:COVID-AID 风险工具的建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239536. eCollection 2020.
7
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission predicts severe disease and in-hospital mortality from Covid-19 - a prospective cohort study.入院时的国家早期预警评分 2 (NEWS2)可预测新冠病毒疾病的严重程度和住院死亡率-一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 13;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00764-3.
8
Risk Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy.意大利伦巴第地区重症监护病房中 COVID-19 患者死亡的相关危险因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1345-1355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539.
9
Evaluation of the Risk Prediction Tools for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective, Observational Study.中国武汉 2019 年冠状病毒病患者风险预测工具的评估:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1004-e1011. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004549.
10
Patient characteristics, clinical course and factors associated to ICU mortality in critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Spain: A prospective, cohort, multicentre study.西班牙感染新型冠状病毒肺炎(SARS-CoV-2)的危重症患者的特征、临床病程及与重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率相关的因素:一项前瞻性队列多中心研究
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;67(8):425-437. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the ALKA and CRS scores to predict outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in United Arab Emirates.比较ALKA和CRS评分以预测阿拉伯联合酋长国2019冠状病毒病感染患者的预后。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1553189. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1553189. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding contextual and practical factors to inform WHO recommendations on using chest imaging to monitor COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' perspective.理解影响世卫组织使用胸部成像监测 COVID-19 肺部后遗症建议的上下文和实际因素:一项探索利益攸关方观点的定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 11;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01088-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19 住院患者的观察性研究。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2411-2418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012410. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area.在纽约市地区,5700 名因 COVID-19 住院的患者的特征、合并症和结局。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
3
Treatment options for COVID-19: The reality and challenges.
Electronic health record-based readmission risk model performance for patients undergoing outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).
基于电子健康记录的门诊静脉抗生素治疗(OPAT)患者再入院风险模型的性能
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Aug 2;2(8):e0000323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000323. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment among COVID-19 Patients Using Different Scores.新冠病毒感染患者应用不同评分系统的房颤与心血管风险评估。
South Med J. 2022 Dec;115(12):921-925. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001477.
5
Correlations between Cytokine Levels, Liver Function Markers, and Neuropilin-1 Expression in Patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者细胞因子水平、肝功能标志物与神经纤毛蛋白-1表达之间的相关性
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;10(10):1636. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101636.
6
Neurocognitive screening in patients following SARS-CoV-2 infection: tools for triage.新冠病毒感染后患者的神经认知筛查:分诊工具。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02817-9.
7
Diagnostic utility of the Covichem score in predicting COVID-19 disease.Covichem 评分预测 COVID-19 疾病的诊断效用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
8
The Pitfalls of Mining for QuantiFERON Gold in Severely Ill Patients With COVID-19.在重症 COVID-19 患者中进行 QuantiFERON Gold 检测的陷阱
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 Oct;6(5):409-419. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
9
Predicting progression to severe COVID-19 using the PAINT score.利用 PAINT 评分预测 COVID-19 进展为重症。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 26;22(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07466-4.
10
Telemedicine and Otolaryngology in the COVID-19 Era.新冠疫情时期的远程医疗与耳鼻喉科
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Feb;132(2):148-154. doi: 10.1177/00034894221081613. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
治疗 COVID-19 的选择:现实与挑战。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Jun;53(3):436-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.034. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
4
Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality.空气传播 SARS-CoV-2:全世界应正视现实。
Environ Int. 2020 Jun;139:105730. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105730. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period.预测 SARS-CoV-2 的传播动力学,直至大流行后期。
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
6
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.
7
Epidemiology, virology, and clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome -coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus Disease-19).严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2;冠状病毒病-19)的流行病学、病毒学及临床特征
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020 Apr;63(4):119-124. doi: 10.3345/cep.2020.00493. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
8
Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis.中国 COVID-19 患者 1590 例的合并症及其影响:一项全国性分析。
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00547-2020. Print 2020 May.
9
Host susceptibility to severe COVID-19 and establishment of a host risk score: findings of 487 cases outside Wuhan.宿主对重症新型冠状病毒肺炎的易感性及宿主风险评分的建立:武汉以外地区487例病例的研究结果
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 18;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2833-7.
10
A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19.洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗成人重症 COVID-19 患者的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. Epub 2020 Mar 18.