Suppr超能文献

探索混合肉类产品中的消费者偏好与挑战:热狗的联合分析

Exploring Consumer Preferences and Challenges in Hybrid Meat Products: A Conjoint Analysis of Hotdogs.

作者信息

Salgaonkar Kashmira, Nolden Alissa A

机构信息

Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 May 9;13(10):1460. doi: 10.3390/foods13101460.

Abstract

Plant-based meat has been the primary strategy to reducing meat consumption. While this category has demonstrated success, with the market value estimated to reach USD 20 billion by 2023, the subsequent reduction in meat consumption has not been proportionate. An alternative approach is hybrid products, which are thought to produce products that more closely resemble meat products. However, whether consumers will be willing to purchase hybrid products remains uncertain. Therefore, the present study uses a conjoint analysis approach to assess the product features driving the selection of a hybrid hotdog. This approach uncovers factors driving consumers' purchase intentions for hybrid meat products when offered as a choice against 100% plant-based and 100% beef products. In an online survey, participants (n = 454; 45.6% female) were asked to select the product they would be most willing to purchase, varying in four characteristics: protein source, price, fat content, and price. Following this task, participants answered questions related to meat attachment, food neophobia, health, ecological, social, and moral motives regarding food consumption. The results revealed that protein source was the most important factor driving product selection, followed by price, fat, and packaging claims (35%, 24%, 21%, and 20% relative importance, respectively). In this study, hybrid hotdogs were the least preferred to beef and plant-based (-16, -2.5, and 18 part-worth utility, respectively). These product-specific attributes (protein, fat, and price) had distinct relationships with the choices of hybrid, plant-based, and hybrid hotdogs, with these factors together explaining slightly more variability in the selection of hybrid (9%) compared to plant-based (7%) and beef hotdogs (4%). For hybrid hotdogs, protein had the greatest influence (B = -1.2) followed by fat (B = -0.8) and price (B = -0.5). Interestingly, person-related parameters (health, meat attachment, ethics, and food neophobia) had no relationship with the selection of hybrid hotdogs, contrary to plant-based (7%) and beef hotdogs (5%). This influence of the different parameters on the selection of hybrid meat is thought to be due to the lack of consumer knowledge and familiarity with hybrid products. The current understanding of plant-based products may not correspond to hybrid products. Engaging with consumers during the development of these products is critical to ensure consumer acceptance and thus support the transition to a more sustainable diet.

摘要

植物性肉类一直是减少肉类消费的主要策略。虽然这一类别已取得成功,预计到2023年市场价值将达到200亿美元,但随后肉类消费的减少并不成比例。另一种方法是混合产品,人们认为这类产品能生产出更接近肉类产品的东西。然而,消费者是否愿意购买混合产品仍不确定。因此,本研究采用联合分析方法来评估驱动混合热狗选择的产品特征。当混合肉类产品作为与100%植物性产品和100%牛肉产品的选择供消费者选择时,这种方法揭示了驱动消费者购买意愿的因素。在一项在线调查中,参与者(n = 454;45.6%为女性)被要求选择他们最愿意购买的产品,这些产品在四个特征上有所不同:蛋白质来源、价格、脂肪含量和包装说明。完成这项任务后,参与者回答了与肉类依恋、食物新恐惧症、健康、生态、社会和道德等有关食物消费动机的问题。结果显示,蛋白质来源是驱动产品选择的最重要因素,其次是价格、脂肪和包装说明(相对重要性分别为35%、24%、21%和20%)。在本研究中,混合热狗是最不受欢迎的,相比牛肉和植物性热狗,其效用值分别为-16、-2.5和18。这些特定产品属性(蛋白质、脂肪和价格)与混合、植物性和混合热狗的选择有着不同的关系,与植物性热狗(7%)和牛肉热狗(4%)相比,这些因素共同解释了混合热狗选择中略多的变异性(9%)。对于混合热狗,蛋白质的影响最大(B = -1.2),其次是脂肪(B = -0.8)和价格(B = -0.5)。有趣的是,与个人相关的参数(健康、肉类依恋、道德和食物新恐惧症)与混合热狗的选择没有关系,这与植物性热狗(7%)和牛肉热狗(5%)不同。不同参数对混合肉类选择的这种影响被认为是由于消费者对混合产品缺乏了解和熟悉。目前对植物性产品的理解可能不适用于混合产品。在这些产品的开发过程中与消费者互动对于确保消费者接受从而支持向更可持续饮食的转变至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c22/11120016/365cff28f284/foods-13-01460-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验