• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的喜欢途径:读者如何到达叙事评价。

Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations.

机构信息

Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 30;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0
PMID:35907147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9339064/
Abstract

When two people read the same story, they might both end up liking it very much. However, this does not necessarily mean that their reasons for liking it were identical. We therefore ask what factors contribute to "liking" a story, and-most importantly-how people vary in this respect. We found that readers like stories because they find them interesting, amusing, suspenseful and/or beautiful. However, the degree to which these components of appreciation were related to how much readers liked stories differed between individuals. Interestingly, the individual slopes of the relationships between many of the components and liking were (positively or negatively) correlated. This indicated, for instance, that individuals displaying a relatively strong relationship between interest and liking, generally display a relatively weak relationship between sadness and liking. The individual differences in the strengths of the relationships between the components and liking were not related to individual differences in expertize, a characteristic strongly associated with aesthetic appreciation of visual art. Our work illustrates that it is important to take into consideration the fact that individuals differ in how they arrive at their evaluation of literary stories, and that it is possible to quantify these differences in empirical experiments. Our work suggests that future research should be careful about "overfitting" theories of aesthetic appreciation to an "idealized reader," but rather take into consideration variations across individuals in the reason for liking a particular story.

摘要

当两个人阅读同一个故事时,他们可能都非常喜欢它。然而,这并不一定意味着他们喜欢它的原因是相同的。因此,我们要问是什么因素促成了对一个故事的“喜欢”,以及最重要的是,人们在这方面是如何存在差异的。我们发现,读者喜欢故事是因为他们觉得故事有趣、有趣、悬疑和/或美丽。然而,欣赏这些成分与读者喜欢故事的程度之间的关系在个体之间存在差异。有趣的是,许多成分与喜好之间的关系的个体斜率(正相关或负相关)存在相关性。例如,这表明在兴趣和喜好之间显示出相对较强关系的个体通常在悲伤和喜好之间显示出相对较弱的关系。成分与喜好之间关系的强弱个体差异与与视觉艺术审美欣赏密切相关的专业知识的个体差异无关。我们的工作表明,考虑到个体在如何得出对文学故事的评价方面存在差异这一事实很重要,并且可以在实证实验中量化这些差异。我们的工作表明,未来的研究应该谨慎地将审美欣赏理论“过度拟合”到一个“理想化的读者”,而是考虑到个体对特定故事的喜好的原因的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/6bffdb034792/41235_2022_419_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/13c477834051/41235_2022_419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/6b97cbf12851/41235_2022_419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/6bffdb034792/41235_2022_419_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/13c477834051/41235_2022_419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/6b97cbf12851/41235_2022_419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc37/9339064/6bffdb034792/41235_2022_419_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations.不同的喜欢途径:读者如何到达叙事评价。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 30;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0.
2
Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives.阅读心灵:叙事的社会认知潜力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1703-1718. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02079-z. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
3
Thrilling News Revisited: The Role of Suspense for the Enjoyment of News Stories.重温激动人心的新闻:悬念对新闻故事趣味性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 15;7:1913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01913. eCollection 2016.
4
"Aha"ptics: Enjoying an Aesthetic Aha During Haptic Exploration.“啊哈”触觉:在触觉探索中享受美学上的顿悟
Perception. 2019 Jan;48(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/0301006618818014. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
5
The power of emotional valence-from cognitive to affective processes in reading.情绪效价的力量——阅读中从认知过程到情感过程的转变
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 28;6:192. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192. eCollection 2012.
6
Getting lost in a story: how narrative engagement emerges from narrative perspective and individual differences in alexithymia.迷失在故事中:叙事视角和述情障碍个体差异如何产生叙事参与
Cogn Emot. 2021 May;35(3):576-588. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1732876. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
The role of the lateral occipital cortex in aesthetic appreciation of representational and abstract paintings: a TMS study.枕外侧皮质在具象画和抽象画审美欣赏中的作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究
Brain Cogn. 2015 Apr;95:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
8
Greater art classification does not necessarily predict better liking: Evidence from graffiti and other visual arts.更高的艺术分类并不一定预示着更强烈的喜爱:来自涂鸦和其他视觉艺术的证据。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):656-659. doi: 10.1002/pchj.473. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
9
Affinity for Poetry and Aesthetic Appreciation of Joyful and Sad Poems.对诗歌的喜爱以及对哀乐之诗的审美鉴赏
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:2051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02051. eCollection 2016.
10
On the relation between perceived stability and aesthetic appreciation.关于感知稳定性与审美欣赏之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103082. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103082. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of art engagement in museums and through digital media.博物馆与通过数字媒体进行艺术参与的比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93630-0.
2
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
An Introduction to Bayesian Multilevel Models Using brms: A Case Study of Gender Effects on Vowel Variability in Standard Indonesian.贝叶斯多层模型简介:以印尼标准语中元音变异性的性别效应为例,使用 brms 进行研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1225-1242. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0006.
2
Readers and their roles: Evidence from readers of contemporary fiction in the Netherlands.读者及其角色:来自荷兰当代小说读者的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201157. eCollection 2018.
3
Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool.
测量审美情绪:文献综述与一种新的评估工具
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178899. eCollection 2017.
4
The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception.艺术接受中负面情绪享受的距离-拥抱模型。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e347. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000309. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.论基本情感决策:喜欢还是不喜欢,这是个问题。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 24;7:1836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836. eCollection 2016.
6
Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds.虚构作品:社会世界的模拟
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading.换位思考:人称代词影响文学阅读的体验层面。
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0154732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154732. eCollection 2016.
8
Neuroscience of aesthetics.美学神经科学
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Apr;1369(1):172-94. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13035. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience.虚构的作用是对社会经验的抽象和模拟。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 May;3(3):173-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x.
10
Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.神经认知诗学:研究文学接受的神经元和认知情感基础的方法和模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 16;9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186. eCollection 2015.