Tilmatine Mesian, Lüdtke Jana, Jacobs Arthur M
Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Centre for Language Studies, Department of Language and Communication, Faculty of Arts, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.
Literary reading is an interactive process between a reader and a text that depends on a balance between cognitive effort and emotional rewards. By studying both the crucial features of the text and of the subjective reader reception, a better understanding of this interactive process can be reached. In the present study, subjects (=31) read and rated a work of narrative fiction that was written in a poetic style, thereby offering the readers two pathways to cognitive rewards: Aesthetic appreciation and narrative immersion. Using purely text-based quantitative descriptors, we were able to independently and accurately predict the subjective ratings in the dimensions comprehensibility, valence, arousal, and liking across roughly 140 pages of naturalistic text. The specific text features that were most important in predicting each rating dimension are discussed in detail. In addition, the implications of the findings are discussed more generally in the context of existing models of literary processing and future research avenues for empirical literary studies.
文学阅读是读者与文本之间的互动过程,这一过程依赖于认知努力与情感回报之间的平衡。通过研究文本的关键特征以及读者的主观接受情况,能够更好地理解这一互动过程。在本研究中,31名受试者阅读并评价了一部以诗体风格创作的叙事小说,从而为读者提供了两条获得认知回报的途径:审美欣赏和叙事沉浸。使用基于文本的纯定量描述符,我们能够独立且准确地预测约140页自然主义文本在可理解性、效价、唤醒度和喜爱度等维度上的主观评分。详细讨论了在预测每个评分维度时最重要的具体文本特征。此外,在现有文学加工模型的背景下更广泛地讨论了研究结果的意义,以及实证文学研究未来的研究方向。