• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究

Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.

作者信息

Tilmatine Mesian, Lüdtke Jana, Jacobs Arthur M

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Centre for Language Studies, Department of Language and Communication, Faculty of Arts, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764
PMID:39439760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11494826/
Abstract

Literary reading is an interactive process between a reader and a text that depends on a balance between cognitive effort and emotional rewards. By studying both the crucial features of the text and of the subjective reader reception, a better understanding of this interactive process can be reached. In the present study, subjects (=31) read and rated a work of narrative fiction that was written in a poetic style, thereby offering the readers two pathways to cognitive rewards: Aesthetic appreciation and narrative immersion. Using purely text-based quantitative descriptors, we were able to independently and accurately predict the subjective ratings in the dimensions comprehensibility, valence, arousal, and liking across roughly 140 pages of naturalistic text. The specific text features that were most important in predicting each rating dimension are discussed in detail. In addition, the implications of the findings are discussed more generally in the context of existing models of literary processing and future research avenues for empirical literary studies.

摘要

文学阅读是读者与文本之间的互动过程,这一过程依赖于认知努力与情感回报之间的平衡。通过研究文本的关键特征以及读者的主观接受情况,能够更好地理解这一互动过程。在本研究中,31名受试者阅读并评价了一部以诗体风格创作的叙事小说,从而为读者提供了两条获得认知回报的途径:审美欣赏和叙事沉浸。使用基于文本的纯定量描述符,我们能够独立且准确地预测约140页自然主义文本在可理解性、效价、唤醒度和喜爱度等维度上的主观评分。详细讨论了在预测每个评分维度时最重要的具体文本特征。此外,在现有文学加工模型的背景下更广泛地讨论了研究结果的意义,以及实证文学研究未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/f7286fdd905e/fpsyg-15-1431764-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/eded3950f5b3/fpsyg-15-1431764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/1497a32a9190/fpsyg-15-1431764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/a8cc69759b56/fpsyg-15-1431764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/1b9f79252fa9/fpsyg-15-1431764-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/de998da371f9/fpsyg-15-1431764-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/e2d7727cbd8b/fpsyg-15-1431764-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/d16b334df370/fpsyg-15-1431764-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/f7286fdd905e/fpsyg-15-1431764-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/eded3950f5b3/fpsyg-15-1431764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/1497a32a9190/fpsyg-15-1431764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/a8cc69759b56/fpsyg-15-1431764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/1b9f79252fa9/fpsyg-15-1431764-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/de998da371f9/fpsyg-15-1431764-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/e2d7727cbd8b/fpsyg-15-1431764-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/d16b334df370/fpsyg-15-1431764-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e898/11494826/f7286fdd905e/fpsyg-15-1431764-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.
2
Experiencing literature on the e-reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen.在电子阅读器上体验文学作品:在屏幕上阅读叙事文本的影响。
J Res Read. 2021 May;44(2):319-338. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12337. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
3
Let's Read a Poem! What Type of Poetry Boosts Creativity?让我们读一首诗!哪种类型的诗歌能提升创造力?
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 21;9:1781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01781. eCollection 2018.
4
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.微观诗歌与神经认知诗学:联想对诗歌接受的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:737756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756. eCollection 2021.
5
Exploring the different cognitive, emotional and imaginative experiences of autistic and non-autistic adult readers when contemplating serious literature as compared to non-fiction.探索自闭症成年读者与非自闭症成年读者在思考严肃文学作品与非虚构作品时不同的认知、情感和想象体验。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 4;14:1001268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1001268. eCollection 2023.
6
Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations.不同的喜欢途径:读者如何到达叙事评价。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 30;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0.
7
Parallelisms and deviations: two fundamentals of an aesthetics of poetic diction.并置与偏离:诗学用语美学的两个基本要素。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220424. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0424. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
8
Points of View and Readers' Immersion in Translation: A Neurocognitive Interpretation of Poetic Translatability.翻译中的观点与读者沉浸感:诗歌可译性的神经认知解读
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:877150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877150. eCollection 2022.
9
Affinity for Poetry and Aesthetic Appreciation of Joyful and Sad Poems.对诗歌的喜爱以及对哀乐之诗的审美鉴赏
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:2051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02051. eCollection 2016.
10
Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers' comments in the margins.Wattpad 作为文学研究的资源。数字社会阅读的重要性的定量和定性例子,以及读者在页边空白处的评论。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226708. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotions, fast and slow: processing of emotion words is affected by individual differences in need for affect and narrative absorption.情绪,快与慢:情绪词的加工受个体对情绪的需求和叙事吸收的个体差异的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2023 Aug-Sep;37(5):997-1005. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2216445. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Different kinds of simulation during literary reading: Insights from a combined fMRI and eye-tracking study.文学阅读中的不同类型模拟:一项结合功能磁共振成像和眼动追踪研究的见解
Cortex. 2023 May;162:115-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
3
Predictive coding is a consequence of energy efficiency in recurrent neural networks.
预测编码是循环神经网络能量效率的一个结果。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Nov 23;3(12):100639. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100639. eCollection 2022 Dec 9.
4
Brain2Pix: Fully convolutional naturalistic video frame reconstruction from brain activity.Brain2Pix:基于大脑活动的全卷积自然主义视频帧重建
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 14;16:940972. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.940972. eCollection 2022.
5
IDEST: International Database of Emotional Short Texts.IDEST:国际情感短文本数据库。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0274480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274480. eCollection 2022.
6
Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations.不同的喜欢途径:读者如何到达叙事评价。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 30;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0.
7
Difficulty and pleasure in the comprehension of verb-based metaphor sentences: A behavioral study.基于动词的隐喻句理解的难度和愉悦感:一项行为研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0263781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263781. eCollection 2022.
8
Aesthetic appraisals of literary style and emotional intensity in narrative engagement are neurally dissociable.审美评价文学风格和叙事参与中的情感强度在神经上是可分离的。
Commun Biol. 2021 Dec 16;4(1):1401. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02926-0.
9
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.微观诗歌与神经认知诗学:联想对诗歌接受的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:737756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756. eCollection 2021.
10
Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context.探索语境中识别习语表达的个体差异。
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 12;4(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.183. eCollection 2021.