• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论基本情感决策:喜欢还是不喜欢,这是个问题。

On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.

作者信息

Jacobs Arthur, Hofmann Markus J, Kinder Annette

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany.

Department of General and Biological Psychology, Bergische Universität Wuppertal Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 24;7:1836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836
PMID:27933013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5122311/
Abstract

Perhaps the most ubiquitous and basic affective decision of daily life is deciding whether we like or dislike something/somebody, or, in terms of psychological emotion theories, whether the object/subject has positive or negative . Indeed, people constantly make such liking decisions within a glimpse and, importantly, often without expecting any obvious benefit or knowing the exact reasons for their judgment. In this paper, we review research on such ) that entail no direct overt reward with a special focus on and discuss methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of EADs to verbal materials with differing degrees of complexity. In line with evolutionary and appraisal theories of (aesthetic) emotions and data from recent neurocognitive studies, the results of a decision tree modeling approach simulating EADs to single words suggest that a main driving force behind EADs is the extent to which such high-dimensional stimuli are associated with the "basic" emotions joy/happiness and disgust.

摘要

或许日常生活中最普遍、最基本的情感决策就是决定我们喜欢还是不喜欢某事物/某人,或者用心理情感理论的术语来说,就是该对象/主体是具有积极还是消极的属性。的确,人们在瞬间就能不断做出这种喜好决策,而且重要的是,往往并不期待有任何明显的益处,也不知道自己判断的确切原因。在本文中,我们回顾了关于此类不涉及直接公开奖励的情感决策的研究,特别关注了……并讨论了研究不同复杂程度言语材料的情感决策的神经元和认知情感基础的方法及模型。与(审美)情感的进化和评价理论以及近期神经认知研究的数据一致,模拟对单个单词情感决策的决策树建模方法的结果表明,情感决策背后的一个主要驱动力是此类高维刺激与“基本”情感愉悦/幸福和厌恶的关联程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/5122311/357181978fa1/fpsyg-07-01836-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/5122311/357181978fa1/fpsyg-07-01836-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/5122311/357181978fa1/fpsyg-07-01836-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.论基本情感决策:喜欢还是不喜欢,这是个问题。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 24;7:1836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836. eCollection 2016.
2
Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.量化文字之美:神经认知诗学视角
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.
3
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?十年来对阅读中情感与审美过程的大声疾呼:有哪些反响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714. eCollection 2015.
4
Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.神经认知诗学:研究文学接受的神经元和认知情感基础的方法和模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 16;9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186. eCollection 2015.
5
Incorporating emotions specific to the sexual response into theories of emotion using the Indiana Sexual and Affective Word Set.将性反应特有的情感纳入情感理论中,使用印第安纳性和情感词汇集。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Feb;40(1):59-78. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9669-1. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
6
Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.潜意识呈现情绪消极与积极的启动刺激会增加目标刺激的感知美感。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3271-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4395-5. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
Does priming negative emotions really contribute to more positive aesthetic judgments? A comparative study of emotion priming paradigms using emotional faces versus emotional scenes and multiple negative emotions with fEMG.情绪启动真的会促进更积极的审美判断吗?使用情绪面孔与情绪场景以及 fEMG 进行多负性情绪的情绪启动范式的比较研究。
Emotion. 2019 Dec;19(8):1396-1413. doi: 10.1037/emo0000528. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
8
[Connection between the evaluation of positive or negative valence and verbal responses to a lexical decision making task].[正负效价评估与词汇决策任务的言语反应之间的联系]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Dec;59(4):255-61. doi: 10.1037/h0088053.
9
Two Sides of Emotion: Exploring Positivity and Negativity in Six Basic Emotions across Cultures.情感的两面:跨文化探索六种基本情绪中的积极与消极
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 20;8:610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00610. eCollection 2017.
10
Emotions in reading: disgust, empathy and the contextual learning hypothesis.阅读中的情绪:厌恶、共情与情境学习假说。
Cognition. 2012 Nov;125(2):333-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of the left medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex in processing positive emotional words: evidence from a meta-analysis and an empirical study.左内侧前额叶皮质和后扣带回皮质在处理积极情绪词汇中的作用:来自一项元分析和实证研究的证据。
Brain Struct Funct. 2025 Jun 10;230(6):95. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02955-z.
2
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Berlyne Revisited: Evidence for the Multifaceted Nature of Hedonic Tone in the Appreciation of Paintings and Music.重访伯利纳:绘画与音乐欣赏中享乐基调多面性的证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 4;10:536. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00536. eCollection 2016.
2
Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words.混合正价与负价:二价词的情感语义整合
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 5;6:30718. doi: 10.1038/srep30718.
3
The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities.
Is badfiction processed differently by the human brain? An electrophysical study on reading experience.
劣质小说在人类大脑中的处理方式是否不同?一项关于阅读体验的电生理学研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jan 26;17:1333965. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1333965. eCollection 2023.
4
Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations.不同的喜欢途径:读者如何到达叙事评价。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 30;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0.
5
Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.读者统觉团的计算模型
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 22;5:718690. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690. eCollection 2022.
6
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.阅读莎士比亚十四行诗:结合定量叙事分析与预测建模——一项眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.5.2.
7
Neuroimaging of valence decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人情绪决策的神经影像学研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr;48:100925. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100925. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics.从计算(神经)诗学视角看词语与虚构人物的情感分析
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 17;6:53. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00053. eCollection 2019.
9
Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人词汇判断中情感贡献的神经相关物。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1.
10
Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?儿童与青少年文学的情感分析:是否存在波莉安娜效应?
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:574746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746. eCollection 2020.
儿童柏林情感词汇表(kidBAWL):探索视觉和听觉模态下情感词汇语义的加工过程。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969. eCollection 2016.
4
Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience.可视化艺术的影响:艺术体验当前心理学模型的更新与比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 26;10:160. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160. eCollection 2016.
5
Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve.喜好与复杂性:剖析倒U型曲线
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 18;10:112. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112. eCollection 2016.
6
A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad.相似性中的一种普遍效价不对称:好的比坏的更相似。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1171-92. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000243. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Caring About Dostoyevsky: The Untapped Potential of Studying Literature.关怀陀思妥耶夫斯基:研究文学的未开发潜力
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):243-245. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
8
The Temporal Pole Top-Down Modulates the Ventral Visual Stream During Social Cognition.颞极在社会认知过程中自上而下调节腹侧视觉通路。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jan 1;27(1):777-792. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv226.
9
Neural representation of emotion regulation goals.情绪调节目标的神经表征
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Feb;37(2):600-20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23053. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion.文本衔接自动分析工具(TAACO):局部、全局及文本衔接的自动评估
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1227-1237. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7.