• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在护理和助产学中的应用:系统评价。

Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):2951-2968. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16478. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.16478
PMID:35908207
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques are being applied in nursing and midwifery to improve decision-making, patient care and service delivery. However, an understanding of the real-world applications of AI across all domains of both professions is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise literature on AI in nursing and midwifery.

METHODS

CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus were searched using relevant terms. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened against eligibility criteria. Data were extracted, analysed, and findings were presented in a descriptive summary. The PRISMA checklist guided the review conduct and reporting.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty articles were included. Nurses' and midwives' involvement in AI varied, with some taking an active role in testing, using or evaluating AI-based technologies; however, many studies did not include either profession. AI was mainly applied in clinical practice to direct patient care (n = 115, 82.14%), with fewer studies focusing on administration and management (n = 21, 15.00%), or education (n = 4, 2.85%). Benefits reported were primarily potential as most studies trained and tested AI algorithms. Only a handful (n = 8, 7.14%) reported actual benefits when AI techniques were applied in real-world settings. Risks and limitations included poor quality datasets that could introduce bias, the need for clinical interpretation of AI-based results, privacy and trust issues, and inadequate AI expertise among the professions.

CONCLUSION

Digital health datasets should be put in place to support the testing, use, and evaluation of AI in nursing and midwifery. Curricula need to be developed to educate the professions about AI, so they can lead and participate in these digital initiatives in healthcare.

RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Adult, paediatric, mental health and learning disability nurses, along with midwives should have a more active role in rigorous, interdisciplinary research evaluating AI-based technologies in professional practice to determine their clinical efficacy as well as their ethical, legal and social implications in healthcare.

摘要

背景

人工智能 (AI) 技术正在护理和助产学中得到应用,以提高决策、患者护理和服务提供的质量。然而,人们对这两个专业领域中 AI 的实际应用的理解是有限的。

目的

综合护理和助产学中人工智能的文献。

方法

使用相关术语在 CINAHL、Embase、PubMed 和 Scopus 中进行搜索。根据入选标准筛选标题、摘要和全文。提取数据,进行分析,并以描述性摘要呈现结果。PRISMA 清单指导了审查的进行和报告。

结果

共纳入 140 篇文章。护士和助产妇在 AI 中的参与程度各不相同,一些人在测试、使用或评估基于 AI 的技术方面发挥了积极作用;然而,许多研究并未涉及这两个专业。AI 主要应用于临床实践,以指导患者护理(n=115,82.14%),较少的研究关注管理和管理(n=21,15.00%),或教育(n=4,2.85%)。报告的好处主要是潜在的,因为大多数研究都在培训和测试 AI 算法。只有少数(n=8,7.14%)在 AI 技术在实际环境中应用时报告了实际收益。风险和限制包括可能引入偏差的数据质量差,需要对基于 AI 的结果进行临床解释,隐私和信任问题,以及专业人员中缺乏 AI 专业知识。

结论

应建立数字健康数据集,以支持护理和助产学中 AI 的测试、使用和评估。需要制定课程,使专业人员了解 AI,以便他们能够领导和参与医疗保健中的这些数字计划。

临床相关性

成人、儿科、精神健康和学习障碍护士以及助产妇应在严格的跨学科研究中发挥更积极的作用,评估基于 AI 的技术在专业实践中的应用,以确定其临床疗效,以及其在医疗保健中的伦理、法律和社会影响。

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review.人工智能在护理和助产学中的应用:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):2951-2968. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16478. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights Into Perceived Worries Regarding the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses in the West Bank.对约旦河西岸重症监护病房护士在采用人工智能方面所感知担忧的洞察。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Sep 3;11:23779608251376177. doi: 10.1177/23779608251376177. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Exploring nurse perspectives on AI-based shift scheduling for fairness, transparency, and work-life balance.探索护士对基于人工智能的轮班排班在公平性、透明度和工作与生活平衡方面的看法。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03808-0.
3
Structural equation modeling for influencing factors on behavioral intention to adopt medical AI among Chinese nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
中国护士采用医学人工智能行为意向影响因素的结构方程模型:一项全国性横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 18;24(1):1084. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03748-9.
4
Resilience as a mediator in the relationship between ambidextrous leadership and nurses' positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence.适应力在双元领导与护士对人工智能的积极态度之间关系中的中介作用
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 4;24(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03624-6.
5
Factors Influencing the Implementation and Adoption of Digital Nursing Technologies: Systematic Umbrella Review.影响数字护理技术实施与应用的因素:系统综合评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 31;27:e64616. doi: 10.2196/64616.
6
Mechanisms of nurses' AI use intention formation in Sichuan, Yunnan, and Beijing, China: mediating effects of AI literacy via self-efficacy-to-attitude pathways.中国四川、云南和北京护士人工智能使用意图形成机制:通过自我效能感-态度路径的人工智能素养中介作用
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;13:1622802. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1622802. eCollection 2025.
7
Generative artificial intelligence in cardiovascular specialty care: a scoping review.心血管专科护理中的生成式人工智能:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 19;24(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03594-9.
8
Capabilities of computerized decision support systems supporting the nursing process in hospital settings: a scoping review.支持医院环境中护理流程的计算机化决策支持系统的能力:一项范围综述。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03272-w.
9
Examining the relationship between midwives' attitudes toward artificial intelligence use and their job satisfaction.考察助产士对人工智能使用的态度与其工作满意度之间的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03346-9.
10
Perspectives on AI-Driven Nursing Science Among Nursing Professionals from China: A Qualitative Study.中国护理专业人员对人工智能驱动的护理科学的看法:一项定性研究。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 14;15(6):218. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060218.