Bramati Luciana, Marques Jair Mendes, Gonçalves Claudia Giglio Oliveira, Welch David, Reddy Ravi, Lacerda Adriana Bender de Moreira
Program in Communication Disorders, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2022 Jul 14;16:909972. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.909972. eCollection 2022.
Noise-induced hearing loss can be avoided by taking preventive measures.
To assess the effectiveness of the Brazilian version of the Dangerous Decibels program for noise-exposed workers, using the ecological model as an educational intervention plan.
Non-randomized interventional study with a quantitative, experimental trial design, conducted at a meatpacking company. The participants were divided into two groups-the first one ( = 132, divided into 6 subgroups) received the Dangerous Decibels Brazil educational intervention (DDBEI) adapted to workers while the second group ( = 138, divided into 5 subgroups) received a conventional educational intervention (CEI). The interventions lasted 50 min. The Hearing Protection Assessment Questionnaire (HPA-5) was administered before and after the interventions. The five dimensions (attitude, behavior, knowledge, supports, and barriers) were compared using the Student's -test for paired data (<0.05).
After both the DDBEI and CEI training, workers improved significantly in barriers, supports, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior around noise. By chance, the CEI group scored lower in all measures than the DDBEI group before training, and though both groups improved, the difference was maintained after training.
The Brazilian version of the Dangerous Decibels program for noise-exposed workers was effective, influencing positively the factors at different levels of the ecological model. Though the DDBEI was no more effective than the CEI, the CEI participants began at much lower levels, so the effectiveness of the DDBEI may have been underestimated.
采取预防措施可避免噪声性听力损失。
以生态模型作为教育干预计划,评估巴西版“危险分贝”项目对接触噪声工人的效果。
在一家肉类加工厂进行的非随机干预研究,采用定量实验性试验设计。参与者分为两组——第一组( = 132人,分为6个亚组)接受针对工人改编的巴西版“危险分贝”教育干预(DDBEI),而第二组( = 138人,分为5个亚组)接受传统教育干预(CEI)。干预持续50分钟。在干预前后发放听力保护评估问卷(HPA - 5)。使用配对数据的学生t检验(<0.05)比较五个维度(态度、行为、知识、支持和障碍)。
在DDBEI和CEI培训后,工人在围绕噪声的障碍、支持、知识、态度和行为方面均有显著改善。偶然的是,CEI组在培训前所有指标的得分均低于DDBEI组,尽管两组都有改善,但培训后差异仍然存在。
巴西版针对接触噪声工人的“危险分贝”项目是有效的,对生态模型不同层面的因素产生了积极影响。虽然DDBEI并不比CEI更有效,但CEI参与者的起始水平要低得多,所以DDBEI的有效性可能被低估了。