Bouchiat Coralie, Ginevra Christophe, Benito Yvonne, Gaillard Tiphaine, Salord Hélène, Dauwalder Olivier, Laurent Frédéric, Vandenesch François
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Biologie Moléculaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Equipe Inserm U1111, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 14;13:943441. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.943441. eCollection 2022.
While 16S rRNA PCR-Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach, using both partial and full-length amplification of the gene, and to explore its feasibility and suitability as a routine diagnostic tool for bacterial infections in a clinical laboratory. Thirty-one culture-negative clinical samples from mono- and polymicrobial infections based on Sanger-sequencing results were sequenced on MinION using both the in-house partial amplification and the Nanopore dedicated kit for the full-length amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Contamination, background noise definition, bacterial identification, and time-effectiveness issues were addressed. Cost optimization was also investigated with the miniaturized version of the flow cell (Flongle). The partial 16S approach had a greater sensitivity compared to the full-length kit that detected bacterial DNA in only 24/31 (77.4%) samples. Setting a threshold of 1% of total reads overcame the background noise issue and eased the interpretation of clinical samples. Results were obtained within 1 day, discriminated polymicrobial samples, and gave accurate bacterial identifications compared to Sanger-based results. We also found that multiplexing and using Flongle flow cells was a cost-effective option. The results confirm that Nanopore technology is user-friendly as well as cost- and time-effective. They also indicate that 16S rRNA targeted metagenomics is a suitable approach to be implemented for the routine diagnosis of culture-negative samples in clinical laboratories.
虽然16S rRNA PCR-Sanger测序为培养阴性细菌感染的诊断铺平了道路,但它无法提供混合微生物感染的组成情况。我们旨在评估基于纳米孔的16S rRNA宏基因组学方法的性能,该方法采用基因的部分扩增和全长扩增,并探讨其作为临床实验室细菌感染常规诊断工具的可行性和适用性。根据Sanger测序结果,从单一和混合微生物感染的31份培养阴性临床样本中,使用内部部分扩增方法和用于16S rRNA基因全长扩增的纳米孔专用试剂盒,在MinION上进行测序。解决了污染、背景噪声定义、细菌鉴定和时间效率等问题。还使用小型化的流动槽(Flongle)研究了成本优化。与全长试剂盒相比,部分16S方法具有更高的灵敏度,全长试剂盒仅在24/31(77.4%)的样本中检测到细菌DNA。将总读数的1%设定为阈值,克服了背景噪声问题,便于临床样本的解读。结果在1天内获得,能够区分混合微生物样本,与基于Sanger的结果相比,细菌鉴定准确。我们还发现,多重检测和使用Flongle流动槽是一种经济高效的选择。结果证实,纳米孔技术用户友好,具有成本效益和时间效益。它们还表明,16S rRNA靶向宏基因组学是临床实验室用于培养阴性样本常规诊断的合适方法。