Nilsson Magnus, Olafsdottir Halla, Alexandersson von Döbeln Gabriella, Villegas Fernanda, Gagliardi Giovanna, Hellström Mats, Wang Qiao-Li, Johansson Hemming, Gebski Val, Hedberg Jakob, Klevebro Fredrik, Markar Sheraz, Smyth Elizabeth, Lagergren Pernilla, Al-Haidari Ghazwan, Rekstad Lars Cato, Aahlin Eirik Kjus, Wallner Bengt, Edholm David, Johansson Jan, Szabo Eva, Reynolds John V, Pramesh C S, Mummudi Naveen, Joshi Amit, Ferri Lorenzo, Wong Rebecca Ks, O'Callaghan Chris, Lukovic Jelena, Chan Kelvin Kw, Leong Trevor, Barbour Andrew, Smithers Mark, Li Yin, Kang Xiaozheng, Kong Feng-Ming, Chao Yin-Kai, Crosby Tom, Bruns Christiane, van Laarhoven Hanneke, van Berge Henegouwen Mark, van Hillegersberg Richard, Rosati Riccardo, Piessen Guillaume, de Manzoni Giovanni, Lordick Florian
Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 13;12:917961. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.917961. eCollection 2022.
The globally dominant treatment with curative intent for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with subsequent esophagectomy. This multimodal treatment leads to around 60% overall 5-year survival, yet with impaired post-surgical quality of life. Observational studies indicate that curatively intended chemoradiotherapy, so-called definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) followed by surveillance of the primary tumor site and regional lymph node stations and surgery only when needed to ensure local tumor control, may lead to similar survival as nCRT with surgery, but with considerably less impairment of quality of life. This trial aims to demonstrate that dCRT, with selectively performed salvage esophagectomy only when needed to achieve locoregional tumor control, is non-inferior regarding overall survival, and superior regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to nCRT followed by mandatory surgery, in patients with operable, locally advanced ESCC.
This is a pragmatic open-label, randomized controlled phase III, multicenter trial with non-inferiority design with regard to the primary endpoint overall survival and a superiority hypothesis for the experimental intervention dCRT with regard to the main secondary endpoint global HRQOL one year after randomization. The control intervention is nCRT followed by preplanned surgery and the experimental intervention is dCRT followed by surveillance and salvage esophagectomy only when needed to secure local tumor control.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04460352.
对于局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC),全球主要的根治性治疗方法是新辅助放化疗(nCRT),随后进行食管切除术。这种多模式治疗可使5年总生存率达到约60%,但术后生活质量会受到影响。观察性研究表明,根治性放化疗,即所谓的根治性放化疗(dCRT),随后对原发肿瘤部位和区域淋巴结站进行监测,仅在需要确保局部肿瘤控制时才进行手术,其生存率可能与nCRT联合手术相似,但对生活质量的损害要小得多。本试验旨在证明,对于可手术的局部晚期ESCC患者,dCRT仅在需要实现局部区域肿瘤控制时选择性地进行挽救性食管切除术,在总生存率方面不劣于nCRT联合强制手术,在健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)方面优于nCRT联合强制手术。
这是一项务实的开放标签、随机对照III期多中心试验,采用非劣效性设计,主要终点为总生存率,对于实验性干预dCRT,在随机分组后一年的主要次要终点全球HRQOL方面采用优效性假设。对照干预是nCRT后进行预先计划的手术,实验性干预是dCRT后进行监测,仅在需要确保局部肿瘤控制时进行挽救性食管切除术。