are employed by the British Nutrition Foundation, London, UK.
Nutr Rev. 2022 Dec 6;81(1):26-54. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac040.
Considering the accumulation of recent studies investigating the health effects of walnut consumption, both including and beyond cardiovascular health effects, a systematic review of this literature to investigate the strength of the evidence is warranted.
To investigate associations between walnut consumption and outcomes with public health relevance (specifically all-cause mortality, type 2 diabetes, CVD, metabolic syndrome, obesity, cancer, neurological and mental health, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and maternal disorders) and the effect on associated disease risk markers, reported in studies published from 2017 to present.
MEDLINE, FSTA, CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched from 1 January 2017 to 5 May 2021.
Human studies (cohort studies and RCTs) ≥3 weeks in duration comparing consumption of walnuts (whole, pieces, or 100% butter) to a control and measuring associations with relevant public health outcomes and disease risk markers were assessed. Key study characteristics were extracted independently by 2 investigators using a standardized table. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Only 1 RCT was considered to be at low risk of bias for any of its outcomes. The cohort studies were considered to be of moderate or high quality. The results were synthesized using vote counting, based on the direction of effect. Thirty-three articles, 23 describing RCTs (walnut dose ∼10-99 g/day, 1,948 subjects) and 10 describing cohort studies (∼675,928 subjects), were included. Vote counting could be performed for the blood lipids, cardiovascular function, inflammation- and hemostatic-related factors, markers of glucose metabolism, and body weight and composition outcome groupings. The results are presented in effect direction plots. With respect to blood lipids, results from 8/8 RCTs favoured walnuts, in accordance with associations with a reduced risk of CVD suggested by cohort studies; results from 6/6 RCTs favoured control with respect to body weight and composition, although most of these effects were small. This was contrary to cohort study results suggesting small benefits of walnut consumption on body weight. There was no overall consistent direction of effect for cardiovascular function, markers of glucose metabolism, or inflammation- and hemostatic-related factors.
Evidence published since 2017 is consistent with previous research suggesting that walnut consumption improves lipid profiles and is associated with reduced CVD risk. Evidence is accumulating in other areas, such as cognitive health, although more research is needed to draw firm conclusions.
PROSPERO registration no. CRD4202122.
鉴于最近有大量研究调查了核桃消费对健康的影响,包括心血管健康以外的影响,因此有必要对这些文献进行系统评价,以调查证据的强度。
调查核桃消费与具有公共卫生相关性的结局之间的关联(特别是全因死亡率、2 型糖尿病、心血管疾病、代谢综合征、肥胖、癌症、神经和心理健康、肌肉骨骼、胃肠道和孕产妇疾病),以及与相关疾病风险标志物的关联,这些标志物是在 2017 年至现在发表的研究中报告的。
从 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 5 日,检索了 MEDLINE、FSTA、CENTRAL 和 Scopus。
对持续时间至少 3 周的比较核桃(整颗、切片或 100% 核桃黄油)消费与对照的人类研究(队列研究和 RCT)进行评估,并测量与相关公共卫生结局和疾病风险标志物的关联。两位研究者独立使用标准化表格提取关键研究特征。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2.0 和 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估研究质量。
只有 1 项 RCT 被认为在其任何结局方面的偏倚风险都较低。队列研究被认为质量为中或高。根据效应方向,使用投票计数法对结果进行综合。共纳入 33 篇文章,23 篇描述 RCT(核桃剂量约为 10-99g/天,1948 名受试者),10 篇描述队列研究(约 675928 名受试者)。可以对血脂、心血管功能、炎症和止血相关因素、葡萄糖代谢标志物以及体重和组成结局进行投票计数。结果以效应方向图呈现。关于血脂,8/8 RCT 的结果均支持核桃,与队列研究提示的核桃消费降低心血管疾病风险的结果一致;6/6 RCT 的结果均支持对照组的体重和组成,尽管这些影响大多较小。这与队列研究结果表明核桃消费对体重有较小的益处相反。心血管功能、葡萄糖代谢标志物或炎症和止血相关因素的方向没有一致的总体效应。
自 2017 年以来发表的证据与之前的研究一致,表明核桃消费可以改善血脂谱,并与降低心血管疾病风险相关。在其他领域,如认知健康,证据也在不断增加,但需要更多的研究来得出明确的结论。
PROSPERO 注册编号 CRD4202122。