Suppr超能文献

生命线危机支持者对自杀风险评估的恐惧、态度和行为。

Suicide risk assessment fears, attitudes and behaviours of lifeline crisis supporters.

机构信息

Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention; School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Counseling Psychology and Human Services, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5083-e5094. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13923. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

Lifeline Australia operates crisis support services through Lifeline Crisis Supporters. An integral part of their role is to conduct online suicide risk assessments with help-seekers. However, there is limited literature regarding suicide risk assessment practices for this population. This study aimed to examine how suicide prevention training, vicarious trauma and fears impacted suicide risk assessment behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters. A cross-sectional survey design was used to recruit a volunteer convenience sample of 125 Lifeline Australia Crisis Supporters (75.2% females; M  = 54.9) in 2018 to participate in an online survey. Findings revealed that those with more suicide-specific training had less risk assessment-related fears, and that fears were not related to attitudes towards suicide prevention. There was no significant relationship between vicarious trauma and amount of training or years of experience in the role. Further, participants with higher levels of vicarious trauma demonstrated significantly more negative attitudes towards suicide prevention. Overall, training appears to be a significant factor in suicide risk assessment practice behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters, highlighting a need for ongoing training and support for them. This research also suggests that whilst fears exist, they do not significantly impair Lifeline Crisis Supporters' ability to undertake suicide risk assessment.

摘要

生命线澳大利亚通过生命线危机支持者运营危机支持服务。他们的角色的一个组成部分是通过在线自杀风险评估来帮助寻求帮助的人。然而,关于这一人群的自杀风险评估实践,文献有限。本研究旨在探讨预防培训、替代性创伤和恐惧如何影响生命线危机支持者的自杀风险评估行为。2018 年,采用横断面调查设计,招募了 125 名澳大利亚生命线危机支持者的志愿者便利样本(75.2%为女性;M=54.9)参与在线调查。研究结果表明,那些接受过更多自杀特定培训的人,对风险评估相关的恐惧较少,而恐惧与对自杀预防的态度无关。替代性创伤与培训量或角色年限之间没有显著关系。此外,替代性创伤程度较高的参与者对自杀预防的态度明显更为消极。总体而言,培训似乎是生命线危机支持者进行自杀风险评估实践行为的一个重要因素,这突显了他们需要持续的培训和支持。这项研究还表明,尽管存在恐惧,但它们并没有显著影响生命线危机支持者进行自杀风险评估的能力。

相似文献

1
Suicide risk assessment fears, attitudes and behaviours of lifeline crisis supporters.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5083-e5094. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13923. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
3
Establishing standards for the assessment of suicide risk among callers to the national suicide prevention lifeline.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007 Jun;37(3):353-65. doi: 10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.353.
5
Lifeline Crisis Chat: Coding form development and findings on chatters' risk status and counselor behaviors.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Jun;52(3):452-466. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12835. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Evaluation of the 113Online Suicide Prevention Crisis Chat Service: Outcomes, Helper Behaviors and Comparison to Telephone Hotlines.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2017 Jun;47(3):282-296. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12286. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
National suicide prevention lifeline: enhancing mental health care for suicidal individuals and other people in crisis.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012 Feb;42(1):22-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00068.x.
8
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline crisis chat interventions: Evaluation of chatters' perceptions of effectiveness.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Dec;51(6):1126-1137. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12795. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9
Impact of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training on the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2013 Dec;43(6):676-91. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12049. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
10
Perceived Impact of COVID-19 Among Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.
Crisis. 2023 Sep;44(5):415-422. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000881. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

3
A Scoping Review of Vicarious Trauma Interventions for Service Providers Working With People Who Have Experienced Traumatic Events.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Dec;23(5):1437-1460. doi: 10.1177/1524838021991310. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Are Clinicians Confident in the Risk Assessment of Suicide?: A Systematic Literature Review.
Arch Suicide Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2020.1792019. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Psychotherapists' vicarious traumatization during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S148-S150. doi: 10.1037/tra0000868. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
How Clinicians Incorporate Suicide Risk Factors Into Suicide Risk Assessment.
Crisis. 2021 Mar;42(2):100-106. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000694. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Impact of Crisis Line Volunteering on Mental Wellbeing and the Associated Factors: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 3;17(5):1641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051641.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Vicarious Trauma Organizational Readiness Guide (VT-ORG).
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Dec;64(3-4):481-493. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12395. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
PTSD Symptoms, Vicarious Traumatization, and Burnout in Front Line Workers in the Homeless Sector.
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Apr;55(3):454-462. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-00364-7. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验