Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention; School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Counseling Psychology and Human Services, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5083-e5094. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13923. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Lifeline Australia operates crisis support services through Lifeline Crisis Supporters. An integral part of their role is to conduct online suicide risk assessments with help-seekers. However, there is limited literature regarding suicide risk assessment practices for this population. This study aimed to examine how suicide prevention training, vicarious trauma and fears impacted suicide risk assessment behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters. A cross-sectional survey design was used to recruit a volunteer convenience sample of 125 Lifeline Australia Crisis Supporters (75.2% females; M = 54.9) in 2018 to participate in an online survey. Findings revealed that those with more suicide-specific training had less risk assessment-related fears, and that fears were not related to attitudes towards suicide prevention. There was no significant relationship between vicarious trauma and amount of training or years of experience in the role. Further, participants with higher levels of vicarious trauma demonstrated significantly more negative attitudes towards suicide prevention. Overall, training appears to be a significant factor in suicide risk assessment practice behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters, highlighting a need for ongoing training and support for them. This research also suggests that whilst fears exist, they do not significantly impair Lifeline Crisis Supporters' ability to undertake suicide risk assessment.
生命线澳大利亚通过生命线危机支持者运营危机支持服务。他们的角色的一个组成部分是通过在线自杀风险评估来帮助寻求帮助的人。然而,关于这一人群的自杀风险评估实践,文献有限。本研究旨在探讨预防培训、替代性创伤和恐惧如何影响生命线危机支持者的自杀风险评估行为。2018 年,采用横断面调查设计,招募了 125 名澳大利亚生命线危机支持者的志愿者便利样本(75.2%为女性;M=54.9)参与在线调查。研究结果表明,那些接受过更多自杀特定培训的人,对风险评估相关的恐惧较少,而恐惧与对自杀预防的态度无关。替代性创伤与培训量或角色年限之间没有显著关系。此外,替代性创伤程度较高的参与者对自杀预防的态度明显更为消极。总体而言,培训似乎是生命线危机支持者进行自杀风险评估实践行为的一个重要因素,这突显了他们需要持续的培训和支持。这项研究还表明,尽管存在恐惧,但它们并没有显著影响生命线危机支持者进行自杀风险评估的能力。