Cadoux C G, White J D, Hedberg M C
Ann Emerg Med. 1987 Jul;16(7):738-42. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80565-6.
All trauma patients undergoing cervical radiography at an urban referral teaching hospital emergency department during 12 consecutive months were analyzed for indications and results of cervical spine radiograph studies. Demographic characteristics of the study group were consistent with results in the literature (55% men, mean age, 27). Cases were reviewed for 27 commonly accepted indications in the literature for cervical spine studies under these circumstances. The following radiograph findings were considered as positive studies: fracture, subluxation, spondylolisthesis, straightening, spasm, foreign body, compression, fusion, narrowing, or soft tissue swelling. Seventeen percent of radiographs were positive. Motor vehicle accidents (P less than .009), a history of direct cervical trauma (P less than .002), loss of consciousness (P less than .001), cervical tenderness (P less than .05), and drug ingestion (P less than .08) were associated with or suggestive of positive radiographs. No patients wearing seatbelts had positive radiographs (P less than .001). Only 2.4% (18 of 749) of radiographic examinations revealed clinically significant findings, and no criteria were statistically correlated with clinically significant findings. While our study suggests up to two-thirds of radiographs might be deferred without missing a clinically significant injury using these high-yield criteria, a flexible approach to cervical roentgenographs is justified pending confirmation of our results by a large, multicenter, prospective study currently under way.
对一家城市转诊教学医院急诊科连续12个月内接受颈椎X线检查的所有创伤患者进行了分析,以了解颈椎X线检查的指征和结果。研究组的人口统计学特征与文献结果一致(55%为男性,平均年龄27岁)。根据文献中在这些情况下颈椎研究的27种普遍认可的指征对病例进行了回顾。以下X线表现被视为阳性研究结果:骨折、半脱位、椎体滑脱、变直、痉挛、异物、压迫、融合、狭窄或软组织肿胀。17%的X线检查结果为阳性。机动车事故(P<0.009)、直接颈椎创伤史(P<0.002)、意识丧失(P<0.001)、颈部压痛(P<0.05)和药物摄入(P<0.08)与阳性X线检查结果相关或提示阳性X线检查结果。没有系安全带的患者X线检查结果为阳性(P<0.001)。只有2.4%(749例中的18例)的X线检查显示有临床意义的发现,且没有任何标准与临床意义的发现有统计学相关性。虽然我们的研究表明,使用这些高收益标准,高达三分之二的X线检查可能可以推迟进行而不会遗漏临床意义重大的损伤,但在目前正在进行的一项大型多中心前瞻性研究证实我们的结果之前,对颈椎X线检查采取灵活的方法是合理的。