• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我喜欢你做的食物!过度积极的反馈最有可能给予那些想要在任务中表现出色但处理失败能力很差的人。

I Like the Food You Made! Overly Positive Feedback Is Most Likely Given to Those That Want to Excel in a Task and Handle Failure Badly.

作者信息

Cantarero Katarzyna, Byrka Katarzyna, Kosiarczyk Aleksandra, Dolinski Dariusz

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, Social Behavior Research Center, SWPS University, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:807958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807958. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807958
PMID:35928429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9344058/
Abstract

In this article, we focus on how people resolve the dilemma between honest feedback and a prosocial lie depending on the context. In a pre-registered study ( = 455), we asked participants to choose between telling the blatant truth or lying prosocially regarding a dish made poorly by a stranger. The results showed that participants were most eager to pass on overly positive feedback when the stranger cared about cooking and was very sensitive to negative feedback. Perceived harm in truth telling mediated the relationship between desire to excel in a task with high ability to handle failure and choosing a prosocial lie.

摘要

在本文中,我们关注人们如何根据具体情境解决诚实反馈与善意谎言之间的两难困境。在一项预先注册的研究(N = 455)中,我们要求参与者在对一个陌生人做的难吃的菜肴说出直白的真话或善意说谎之间做出选择。结果表明,当陌生人关心烹饪且对负面反馈非常敏感时,参与者最急于传递过度积极的反馈。在说实话时感知到的伤害介导了在处理失败能力较高的任务中追求卓越的愿望与选择善意谎言之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4253/9344058/3e35a736c2dc/fpsyg-13-807958-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4253/9344058/585210f7b0ef/fpsyg-13-807958-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4253/9344058/3e35a736c2dc/fpsyg-13-807958-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4253/9344058/585210f7b0ef/fpsyg-13-807958-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4253/9344058/3e35a736c2dc/fpsyg-13-807958-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
I Like the Food You Made! Overly Positive Feedback Is Most Likely Given to Those That Want to Excel in a Task and Handle Failure Badly.我喜欢你做的食物!过度积极的反馈最有可能给予那些想要在任务中表现出色但处理失败能力很差的人。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:807958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807958. eCollection 2022.
2
Prosocial lie-telling in preschoolers: The impacts of ethnic background, parental factors, and perceived consequence for the partner.学龄前儿童的亲社会说谎行为:种族背景、父母因素以及对同伴的预期后果的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1128685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128685. eCollection 2023.
3
Differences and similarities in lying frequency, moral evaluations, and beliefs about lying among children with and without conduct problems.患有与不患有品行问题的儿童在说谎频率、道德评价和说谎信念方面的差异和相似之处。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104768. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
4
Lying because we care: Compassion increases prosocial lying.出于关心而说谎:同情心会增加亲社会说谎行为。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jul;146(7):1026-1042. doi: 10.1037/xge0000315. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
Children's Reasoning about Lie-telling and Truth-telling in Politeness Contexts.儿童在礼貌情境中对说谎与说实话的推理。
Soc Dev. 2009 Aug;18(3):728-746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00495.x.
6
Telling a 'good or white lie': The views of people living with dementia and their carers.善意或白色谎言:痴呆症患者及其照顾者的观点。
Dementia (London). 2020 Nov;19(8):2582-2600. doi: 10.1177/1471301219831525. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Eliciting preferences for truth-telling in a survey of politicians.在对政治家的调查中引出关于说实话的偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):22002-22008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008144117. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Perceptions of Dishonesty: Understanding Parents' Reports of and Influence on Children and Adolescents' Lie-Telling.欺骗行为的认知:理解父母对儿童和青少年说谎行为的报告和影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jan;49(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01153-5. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.谎言、真相、谎言:任务切换在欺骗情境中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):478-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
10
Predictors of children's prosocial lie-telling: Motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding.儿童亲社会说谎的预测因素:动机、社会化变量和道德理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):373-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Community standards of deception: Deception is perceived to be ethical when it prevents unnecessary harm.欺骗的社会标准:当欺骗能够防止不必要的伤害时,它被认为是符合道德的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):410-436. doi: 10.1037/xge0001081. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Civic honesty around the globe.全球公民诚信。
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):70-73. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8712. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
When is a lie acceptable? Work and private life lying acceptance depends on its beneficiary.什么时候谎言是可以接受的?工作和私人生活中对谎言的接受与否取决于其受益者。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(2):220-235. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1327404. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
White Lies in Hand: Are Other-Oriented Lies Modified by Hand Gestures? Possibly Not.手中的善意谎言:以他人为导向的谎言会因手势而改变吗?可能不会。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 22;8:814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00814. eCollection 2017.
5
The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.对偶道德理论:通过重新定义伤害来重塑道德判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;22(1):32-70. doi: 10.1177/1088868317698288. Epub 2017 May 14.
6
Lying because we care: Compassion increases prosocial lying.出于关心而说谎:同情心会增加亲社会说谎行为。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jul;146(7):1026-1042. doi: 10.1037/xge0000315. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
The roles of liar intention, lie content, and theory of mind in children's evaluation of lies.说谎意图、谎言内容和心理理论在儿童对谎言的评价中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;132:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
8
The effect of non-contingent and accurate performance feedback on pacing and time trial performance in 4-km track cycling.非关联且准确的绩效反馈对 4 公里自行车计时赛的节奏和计时赛表现的影响。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):225-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062844. Epub 2009 Oct 25.
9
Feedback to clinicians: theory, research, and practice.给临床医生的反馈:理论、研究与实践。
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Feb;61(2):145-53. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20107.
10
Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.日常存在于亲密且随意的关系之中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jan;74(1):63-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63.