Cantarero Katarzyna, Szarota Piotr, Stamkou Eftychia, Navas Marisol, Dominguez Espinosa Alejandra Del Carmen
a SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities.
b Polish Academy of Sciences.
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(2):220-235. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1327404. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
In this article we show that when analyzing attitude towards lying in a cross-cultural setting, both the beneficiary of the lie (self vs other) and the context (private life vs. professional domain) should be considered. In a study conducted in Estonia, Ireland, Mexico, The Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and Sweden (N = 1345), in which participants evaluated stories presenting various types of lies, we found usefulness of relying on the dimensions. Results showed that in the joint sample the most acceptable were other-oriented lies concerning private life, then other-oriented lies in the professional domain, followed by egoistic lies in the professional domain; and the least acceptance was shown for egoistic lies regarding one's private life. We found a negative correlation between acceptance of a behavior and the evaluation of its deceitfulness.
在本文中，我们表明，在跨文化背景下分析对说谎的态度时，应同时考虑谎言的受益者（自我与他人）和背景（私人生活与专业领域）。在一项针对爱沙尼亚、爱尔兰、墨西哥、荷兰、波兰、西班牙和瑞典（N = 1345）开展的研究中，参与者对呈现各种类型谎言的故事进行了评估，我们发现依据这些维度是有用的。结果显示，在综合样本中，最可接受的是关于私人生活的他人导向型谎言，其次是专业领域的他人导向型谎言，接着是专业领域的利己主义谎言；而关于个人私人生活的利己主义谎言的接受度最低。我们发现行为的可接受性与其欺骗性评估之间存在负相关。
