Suppr超能文献

对《精神幸福感问卷》(SWBQ)的因子结构、信度和效度的再评估。

A Reevaluation of the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ).

机构信息

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, University Drive, Mt Helen, PO Box 663, Ballarat, VIC, 3353, Australia.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2023 Jun;62(3):2112-2130. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01619-0. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

Abstract

The 20-item Gomez and Fisher (Personal Individ Differ 35:1975-1991, 2003) Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ) is a widely used measure of spiritual well-being. Its theoretical model is a higher-order model with primary factors for personal, communal, environmental, and transcendental well-being, and a secondary global spiritual well-being factor. The current study, conducted in Australia, reevaluated the factor structure of the SWBQ. Unlike previous studies, the current study also used exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) to examine the factor structure of the SWBQ and selected the preferred model using not only global model fit values, but also the clarity, reliabilities, and validities of the factors in the models. A total of 227 adults (males = 63; females = 164; M age = 26.1 years; SD = 5.2 years) completed the SWBQ. Based on the model selection criteria applied in the study, the ESEM model with four group factors was selected as the preferred model. However, there was also adequate support for the proposed theoretical higher-order model and the first-order oblique model with the four well-being factors. Concerning our preferred model, its factors showed reasonable clarity for factor loadings and (omega) reliabilities. However, only the communal domain scale was supported empirically for external validity. The implications of the findings for the theoretical model, the use of the SWBQ, and future studies are discussed. In this respect, there are three potential models (theorized higher-order model, 4-factor first-order oblique model, and the ESEM model proposed in this study) that warrant further detailed investigation with a larger, more representative population and additional validation measures.

摘要

戈麦斯和费舍尔(Gomez and Fisher)的 20 项个人差异问卷(Personal Individ Differ 35:1975-1991, 2003)精神健康问卷(SWBQ)是一种广泛使用的精神健康衡量标准。它的理论模型是一个高阶模型,有个人、社区、环境和超越性幸福感的主要因素,以及一个次要的全球精神幸福感因素。本研究在澳大利亚进行,重新评估了 SWBQ 的因素结构。与之前的研究不同,本研究还使用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)来检验 SWBQ 的因素结构,并不仅使用整体模型拟合值,还使用模型中的因素的清晰度、可靠性和有效性来选择首选模型。共有 227 名成年人(男性=63;女性=164;M 年龄=26.1 岁;SD=5.2 岁)完成了 SWBQ。根据本研究中应用的模型选择标准,选择了具有四个组因素的 ESEM 模型作为首选模型。然而,也有足够的证据支持提出的高阶理论模型和具有四个幸福感因素的一阶斜交模型。关于我们的首选模型,其因素在因素负荷和(omega)可靠性方面具有合理的清晰度。然而,只有社区领域量表在外部有效性方面得到了实证支持。研究结果对理论模型、SWBQ 的使用以及未来研究具有重要意义。在这方面,有三个潜在的模型(理论上的高阶模型、具有四个因素的一阶斜交模型和本研究提出的 ESEM 模型)需要进一步用更大、更具代表性的人群和附加验证措施进行详细调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5779/10133068/d664c58d5c51/10943_2022_1619_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验