Department of Migration & Urban Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, 400088, India.
Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, 732103, India.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):1497. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13912-4.
The prevalence of unsafe abortions significantly varies with geography; therefore, more research is needed to understand the rural-urban differences in unsafe abortion practices in India. The present study aims to explore the rural-urban differences in predisposing, enabling, and need factors of unsafe abortion in India.
The present study used the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey (2015-16) and included the women aged 15-49 who terminated pregnancies by induced abortion during the 5 years prior to the survey (N = 9113) as the study sample. Descriptive statistics, bivariate chi-square significance test and multivariate logistic regression model were used to accomplish the study objectives.
The findings revealed that almost one-third of pregnancies were terminated through unsafe measures with sharp rural-urban contrast. The likelihood of unsafe abortions increases with decreasing women's age and spousal level of education. Younger women in urban settings were more vulnerable to unsafe abortion practices. In rural settings, women with an uneducated spouse are more likely to have unsafe abortions (OR: 1.92). Poor households were more likely to undergo unsafe abortions, which were more common in rural settings (OR: 1.26). The unmet need for family planning was revealed to be a significant need factor for unsafe abortion, particularly in rural settings.
Although abortion is legal, India's high estimated frequency of unsafe abortions reveals a serious public health issue. Due to socio-economic vulnerability, unmet family planning needs, and a lack of awareness, significant numbers of women still practice unsafe abortions in India.
不安全堕胎的流行情况在不同地区存在显著差异;因此,需要更多的研究来了解印度农村和城市地区不安全堕胎实践的差异。本研究旨在探讨印度农村和城市地区不安全堕胎的倾向因素、促成因素和需求因素的差异。
本研究使用了第四次国家家庭健康调查(2015-16 年)的数据,包括在调查前 5 年内通过人工流产终止妊娠的年龄在 15-49 岁的女性(N=9113)作为研究样本。采用描述性统计、双变量卡方显著性检验和多变量逻辑回归模型来完成研究目标。
研究结果表明,近三分之一的妊娠是通过不安全的措施终止的,城乡之间存在明显的差异。不安全堕胎的可能性随着女性年龄和配偶教育程度的降低而增加。城市中年轻的女性更容易进行不安全的堕胎。在农村地区,配偶未受教育的女性更有可能进行不安全的堕胎(OR:1.92)。贫困家庭更有可能进行不安全的堕胎,而这种情况在农村地区更为常见(OR:1.26)。未满足的计划生育需求被揭示为不安全堕胎的一个重要需求因素,尤其是在农村地区。
尽管堕胎在印度是合法的,但估计的高频率不安全堕胎表明这是一个严重的公共卫生问题。由于社会经济脆弱性、未满足的计划生育需求以及缺乏意识,印度仍有大量女性进行不安全的堕胎。