University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
EHESS, Paris, France.
Br J Sociol. 2022 Sep;73(4):667-684. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12971. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Status attainment theories assert that individuals are recruited based on the length and functional background of their training. Elite theories assume that top managers often deviate from these socially acceptable mechanisms of status attainment to entrench their advantage. In this study, focusing on the US financial sector, we investigate whether educational institution prestige-rather than the subject or length of education-increasingly influences appointments to top executive positions. We analyze 1987 US top executive managers affiliated with 147 firms from both financial and non-financial sectors in 2005 and 2018. Our study demonstrates that alumni of prestigious universities have a strikingly higher likelihood of attaining a top executive role in finance than in non-finance. Within finance it is no longer investment banking, but private equity, that contains the highest proportion of elite university graduates. Our findings suggest that notwithstanding the major power shifts between finance and non-finance-and also within the finance sector-elite groups still dominate the most symbolically valued education, and as a result, top managerial positions.
地位获得理论认为,个人是根据其培训的长度和功能背景被招募的。精英理论假设,高层管理者经常偏离这些社会可接受的地位获得机制,以巩固自己的优势。在这项研究中,我们以美国金融部门为重点,研究了教育机构的声望——而不是教育的学科或长度——是否越来越影响到高层管理职位的任命。我们分析了 2005 年和 2018 年来自 147 家金融和非金融公司的 1987 名美国高管经理。我们的研究表明,名校校友担任金融高管的可能性明显高于非金融高管。在金融领域,不再是投资银行,而是私募股权,拥有最多的精英大学毕业生。我们的研究结果表明,尽管金融和非金融之间以及金融部门内部发生了重大权力转移,但精英群体仍然主导着最具象征性价值的教育,进而主导着高层管理职位。