Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01448-z. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
To understand perioperative practices for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) among academic medical centers. An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to fellows and program directors participating in 49 American Head and Neck Society fellowships. Operative decisions, medical and swallowing management, and disposition planning were assessed. Thirty-eight responses were collected (77.6%). Twenty-three centers (60.5%) performed > 25 cases annually with the remainder performing fewer. The da Vinci Si was the most commonly used platform (n = 28, 73.7%). A majority of institutions advocated tailored resection to adequate margins (n = 27, 71.1%) over fixed subunit-based resection (n = 11, 28.9%). Most surgeons (n = 29, 76.3%) performed neck dissection concurrent with TORS, and 89.5% (n = 34) routinely ligated external carotid artery branches. A minority of institutions (n = 17, 45.9%) endorsed a standardized TORS care pathway. Antibiotic choices and duration varied, the most common choice being ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 21, 55.3%), and the most common duration being 24 h or less (n = 22, 57.9%). Multimodal analgesia was used at 36 centers (94.7%), steroids at 31 centers (81.6%), and pharmacologic venous thromboembolic prophylaxis at 29 centers (76.3%). Nasogastric feeding tubes were placed during surgery at 20 institutions (54.1%). Speech-language pathologists routinely performed postoperative swallow evaluations at 29 (78.4%) sites. Practice patterns are variable among institutions performing TORS. While certain surgical and postoperative practices were quite common, many institutions reported no standard TORS care pathway. Further understanding of the impact of individual practices on outcomes is necessary to develop evidence-based perioperative protocols for TORS.
为了了解学术医学中心中经口机器人手术(TORS)的围手术期实践。我们向参加 49 个美国头颈学会奖学金的研究员和项目主任分发了一份电子横断面调查。评估了手术决策、医疗和吞咽管理以及处置计划。共收集了 38 份回复(77.6%)。23 个中心(60.5%)每年进行>25 例手术,其余中心则进行较少的手术。达芬奇 Si 是使用最广泛的平台(n=28,73.7%)。大多数机构提倡根据需要进行适当边缘的定制切除(n=27,71.1%),而不是基于固定亚单位的切除(n=11,28.9%)。大多数外科医生(n=29,76.3%)同时进行颈清扫术和 TORS,89.5%(n=34)常规结扎颈外动脉分支。少数机构(n=17,45.9%)认可标准化的 TORS 护理路径。抗生素的选择和持续时间各不相同,最常见的选择是氨苄西林/舒巴坦(n=21,55.3%),最常见的持续时间为 24 小时或更短(n=22,57.9%)。36 个中心(94.7%)使用多模式镇痛,31 个中心(81.6%)使用类固醇,29 个中心(76.3%)使用药物性静脉血栓栓塞预防。20 个机构(54.1%)在手术期间放置鼻胃管。29 个机构(78.4%)的言语语言病理学家常规进行术后吞咽评估。进行 TORS 的机构之间的实践模式存在差异。虽然某些手术和术后实践非常常见,但许多机构报告没有标准的 TORS 护理路径。进一步了解个别实践对结果的影响对于制定 TORS 的循证围手术期方案是必要的。