• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口机器人手术的实践模式:美国头颈学会调查结果。

Practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery: results of an American head and neck society survey.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01448-z. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-022-01448-z
PMID:35933632
Abstract

To understand perioperative practices for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) among academic medical centers. An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to fellows and program directors participating in 49 American Head and Neck Society fellowships. Operative decisions, medical and swallowing management, and disposition planning were assessed. Thirty-eight responses were collected (77.6%). Twenty-three centers (60.5%) performed > 25 cases annually with the remainder performing fewer. The da Vinci Si was the most commonly used platform (n = 28, 73.7%). A majority of institutions advocated tailored resection to adequate margins (n = 27, 71.1%) over fixed subunit-based resection (n = 11, 28.9%). Most surgeons (n = 29, 76.3%) performed neck dissection concurrent with TORS, and 89.5% (n = 34) routinely ligated external carotid artery branches. A minority of institutions (n = 17, 45.9%) endorsed a standardized TORS care pathway. Antibiotic choices and duration varied, the most common choice being ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 21, 55.3%), and the most common duration being 24 h or less (n = 22, 57.9%). Multimodal analgesia was used at 36 centers (94.7%), steroids at 31 centers (81.6%), and pharmacologic venous thromboembolic prophylaxis at 29 centers (76.3%). Nasogastric feeding tubes were placed during surgery at 20 institutions (54.1%). Speech-language pathologists routinely performed postoperative swallow evaluations at 29 (78.4%) sites. Practice patterns are variable among institutions performing TORS. While certain surgical and postoperative practices were quite common, many institutions reported no standard TORS care pathway. Further understanding of the impact of individual practices on outcomes is necessary to develop evidence-based perioperative protocols for TORS.

摘要

为了了解学术医学中心中经口机器人手术(TORS)的围手术期实践。我们向参加 49 个美国头颈学会奖学金的研究员和项目主任分发了一份电子横断面调查。评估了手术决策、医疗和吞咽管理以及处置计划。共收集了 38 份回复(77.6%)。23 个中心(60.5%)每年进行>25 例手术,其余中心则进行较少的手术。达芬奇 Si 是使用最广泛的平台(n=28,73.7%)。大多数机构提倡根据需要进行适当边缘的定制切除(n=27,71.1%),而不是基于固定亚单位的切除(n=11,28.9%)。大多数外科医生(n=29,76.3%)同时进行颈清扫术和 TORS,89.5%(n=34)常规结扎颈外动脉分支。少数机构(n=17,45.9%)认可标准化的 TORS 护理路径。抗生素的选择和持续时间各不相同,最常见的选择是氨苄西林/舒巴坦(n=21,55.3%),最常见的持续时间为 24 小时或更短(n=22,57.9%)。36 个中心(94.7%)使用多模式镇痛,31 个中心(81.6%)使用类固醇,29 个中心(76.3%)使用药物性静脉血栓栓塞预防。20 个机构(54.1%)在手术期间放置鼻胃管。29 个机构(78.4%)的言语语言病理学家常规进行术后吞咽评估。进行 TORS 的机构之间的实践模式存在差异。虽然某些手术和术后实践非常常见,但许多机构报告没有标准的 TORS 护理路径。进一步了解个别实践对结果的影响对于制定 TORS 的循证围手术期方案是必要的。

相似文献

1
Practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery: results of an American head and neck society survey.经口机器人手术的实践模式:美国头颈学会调查结果。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01448-z. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
2
Trends and the utilization of transoral robotic surgery with neck dissection in New York State.纽约州经口机器人手术联合颈部清扫术的趋势与应用情况
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jul;127(7):1571-1576. doi: 10.1002/lary.26345. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
Perioperative safety, feasibility, and oncologic utility of transoral robotic surgery with da Vinci Xi platform.经达芬奇 Xi 平台的经口机器人手术的围手术期安全性、可行性和肿瘤学应用。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):85-89. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00938-x. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Role of transoral robotic surgery in current head & neck practice.经口机器人手术在当前头颈外科实践中的作用。
Surgeon. 2017 Jun;15(3):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
Is the Da Vinci Xi system a real improvement for oncologic transoral robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature.达芬奇 Xi 系统是否真的能提高经口机器人肿瘤手术水平?文献系统综述。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01132-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Feasibility and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for early hypopharyngeal cancer: a subset analysis of the Hamburg University TORS-trial.经口机器人手术(TORS)治疗早期下咽癌的可行性和安全性:汉堡大学TORS试验的亚组分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;272(10):2993-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3259-0. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
7
Timing of neck dissection in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer.接受经口机器人手术治疗头颈癌患者的颈部清扫时机。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;41(6):773-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Treatment outcomes of transoral robotic and non-robotic surgeries to treat oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective observational study in Japan.经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗口咽、下咽和喉上部鳞状细胞癌的治疗效果:日本多中心回顾性观察研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Compared Outcomes of Concurrent versus Staged Transoral Robotic Surgery with Neck Dissection.同期与分期经口机器人手术联合颈部清扫术的比较结果
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Nov;157(5):791-797. doi: 10.1177/0194599817706499. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.放疗与经口机器人手术和颈部清扫术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(ORATOR):一项开放标签、2 期、随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Volume Outcome Relationships of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery.接受经口机器人手术的口咽癌患者的容积-结局关系
Laryngoscope. 2025 Aug;135(8):2810-2818. doi: 10.1002/lary.32098. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
The influence of perioperative enoxaparin on bleeding after TORS oropharyngectomy.经口内镜下咽肿瘤切除术(TORS)或口咽肿瘤切除术围手术期依诺肝素对出血的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 7;18(1):203. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01965-z.
3
National Trends in 30-Day Readmission Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Powered Air-Purifying Respirator Devices on Word Recognition in Health Care Providers.动力空气净化呼吸器设备对医护人员单词识别的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Sep;167(3):469-471. doi: 10.1177/01945998211058350. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
2
Impact of surgical margins on local control in patients undergoing single-modality transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.单模态经口机器人手术治疗 HPV 相关口咽鳞状细胞癌患者中手术切缘对局部控制的影响。
Head Neck. 2021 Aug;43(8):2434-2444. doi: 10.1002/hed.26708. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Opioid Usage and Prescribing Predictors Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer.
经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌 30 天后再入院的全国趋势。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb 1;150(2):133-141. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.4025.
经口机器人手术治疗口咽癌后阿片类药物使用和处方预测因素。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):E1888-E1894. doi: 10.1002/lary.29276. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Enhanced recovery protocol for transoral robotic surgery demonstrates improved analgesia and narcotic use reduction.经口机器人手术的强化康复方案可改善镇痛效果并减少麻醉药物使用。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102649. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102649. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Association of multimodal analgesia with perioperative safety and opioid use following head and neck microvascular reconstruction.多模式镇痛与头颈部微血管重建术后围手术期安全性和阿片类药物使用的关联。
Head Neck. 2020 Oct;42(10):2887-2895. doi: 10.1002/hed.26341. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer. A systematic review of the literature.经口机器人手术与头颈癌开放性手术的比较。文献系统评价。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):e599-e607. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23632.
7
Bleeding Complications After Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.经口机器人手术术后出血并发症:Meta 分析和系统评价。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):95-105. doi: 10.1002/lary.28580. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
Dysphagia After Primary Transoral Robotic Surgery With Neck Dissection vs Nonsurgical Therapy in Patients With Low- to Intermediate-Risk Oropharyngeal Cancer.低至中危口咽癌患者行一期经口机器人手术联合颈部清扫与非手术治疗后的吞咽困难情况
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov 1;145(11):1053-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2725.
9
Systematic review of international guidelines for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Head & Neck Surgery. A YO-IFOS Head & Neck Study Group Position Paper.头颈部手术围手术期抗生素预防国际指南的系统评价。YO-IFOS 头颈部研究组立场文件。
Head Neck. 2019 Sep;41(9):3434-3456. doi: 10.1002/hed.25856. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
10
Prophylactic versus reactive gastrostomy tube placement in advanced head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review.预防性与反应性胃造口管在头颈部癌根治性放化疗中的应用:系统评价。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Dec;87:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 25.