• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民主、治理和政府政策对新冠疫情死亡率的影响。

The influence of democracy, governance and government policies on the COVID-19 pandemic mortality.

作者信息

Wagschal Uwe

机构信息

University of Freiburg Freiburg im Breisgau Germany.

出版信息

Eur Policy Anal. 2022 Spring;8(2):231-247. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1146. Epub 2022 May 10.

DOI:10.1002/epa2.1146
PMID:35937045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9347565/
Abstract

The paper analyses the determinants of mortality during the Corona pandemic. In a first step, possible causes are subjected to a global comparison.The focus is on political, institutional, economic, demographic and health policy factors. It is shown that, contrary to the assumption, democratic countries have a higher Covid-19 mortality. In a second step, the developed democracies are then analysed to explain this puzzle. Here, more detailed information is used than in the global comparison. It turns out that, measured by the Oxford Stringency Index, government action has been largely unsuccessful. Also, the party-political composition of the government does not play a role.The most important factors are a country's governance structures, the level of corona incidence, a country's burden of high-risk patients and its health system. In addition, cultural factors and the vaccination rate seem to have an influence on mortality.

摘要

本文分析了新冠疫情期间死亡率的决定因素。第一步,对可能的原因进行全球比较。重点关注政治、制度、经济、人口和卫生政策因素。结果表明,与假设相反,民主国家的新冠死亡率更高。第二步,对发达民主国家进行分析以解释这一谜题。在此,使用了比全球比较更详细的信息。结果发现,以牛津严格指数衡量,政府行动在很大程度上并不成功。此外,政府的政党政治构成也不起作用。最重要的因素是一个国家的治理结构、新冠发病率水平、高危患者负担及其卫生系统。此外,文化因素和疫苗接种率似乎对死亡率有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/8dc0b6c949f7/EPA2-8-231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/5304e8fe66e4/EPA2-8-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/7af79e32c5ba/EPA2-8-231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/8dc0b6c949f7/EPA2-8-231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/5304e8fe66e4/EPA2-8-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/7af79e32c5ba/EPA2-8-231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e217/9347565/8dc0b6c949f7/EPA2-8-231-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of democracy, governance and government policies on the COVID-19 pandemic mortality.民主、治理和政府政策对新冠疫情死亡率的影响。
Eur Policy Anal. 2022 Spring;8(2):231-247. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1146. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
COVID-19 in conflict region: the arab levant response.新冠疫情在冲突地区:阿拉伯黎凡特的应对。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;21(1):1590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11580-4.
3
Does Governance Quality Matter for the Selection of Policy Stringency to Fight COVID-19?治理质量是否对选择抗击 COVID-19 的政策严格程度有影响?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 30;19(11):6679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116679.
4
Why do democracies respond differently to COVID-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea.为什么民主国家对 COVID-19 的反应不同?以美国和韩国为例的比较。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 15;11:1285552. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285552. eCollection 2023.
5
Tuberculosis结核病
6
The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis.1980 年至 2016 年期间 170 个国家的民主经验、成年人健康与特定病因死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1628-1640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30235-1. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
COVID-19 vaccination and governance in the case of low, middle and high-income countries.新冠病毒疫苗接种和低、中、高收入国家的治理。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15975-3.
8
[Democracy and Covid-19 mortality in Europe.].[欧洲的民主与新冠疫情死亡率。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Jun 24;94:e202006073.
9
Political institutions and policy responses during a crisis.危机期间的政治制度与政策应对措施。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 May;185:647-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
Government, politics and health policy: A quantitative analysis of 30 European countries.政府、政治与卫生政策:对30个欧洲国家的定量分析
Health Policy. 2015 Oct;119(10):1298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Excess Mortality and its Determinants During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 21 Countries: An Ecological Study from the C-MOR Project, 2020 and 2021.21个国家在2020年和2021年新冠疫情期间的超额死亡率及其决定因素:C-MOR项目的一项生态学研究
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Dec;14(4):1650-1661. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00320-7. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Sociopolitical context and COVID-19 fatality rates in OECD countries: a configurational approach.经合组织国家的社会政治背景与 COVID-19 死亡率:一种组态方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):2400. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19594-4.
3
COVID-19 and European Multi-Level Democracy.

本文引用的文献

1
The underlying factors of excess mortality in 2020: a cross-country analysis of pre-pandemic healthcare conditions and strategies to cope with Covid-19.2020 年超额死亡率的潜在因素:对大流行前医疗保健条件和应对新冠病毒策略的跨国分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):1197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07169-7.
2
Under-reporting of deaths limits our understanding of true burden of covid-19.死亡报告不足限制了我们对新冠疫情真实负担的了解。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 12;375:n2239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2239.
3
Assessment of health equity consideration in masking/PPE policies to contain COVID-19 using PROGRESS-plus framework: a systematic review.
新冠疫情与欧洲多层次民主
J Common Mark Stud. 2022 Sep 4. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13417.
4
COVID-19 Case Tracking System in Quarantine Policy: Focus on the Privacy Shift Concept and Application in South Korea.隔离政策中的 COVID-19 病例追踪系统:关注韩国隐私转变概念及其应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;19(18):11270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811270.
使用 PROGRESS-Plus 框架评估掩蔽/个人防护装备政策在控制 COVID-19 中的公平性考虑因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):1682. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11688-7.
4
Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes.民主与新冠疫情结果。
Econ Lett. 2021 Jun;203:109840. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
Evaluating the massive underreporting and undertesting of COVID-19 cases in multiple global epicenters.评估多个全球疫情中心 COVID-19 病例的大量漏报和漏检。
Pulmonology. 2021 Mar-Apr;27(2):110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
6
The health gap: the challenge of an unequal world.健康差距:不平等世界的挑战。
Lancet. 2015 Dec 12;386(10011):2442-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00150-6. Epub 2015 Sep 9.