• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的社区层面新冠疫情危机管理模式:零容忍策略。

China's community-based crisis management model for COVID-19: A zero-tolerance approach.

机构信息

School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.

School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:880479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.880479. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.880479
PMID:35937237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9353073/
Abstract

At present, the zero-tolerance and co-existence approaches are the two basic concepts used to manage COVID-19. With the increase in vaccination rates and the continuing impact of the pandemic on people's lives, the co-existence approach has become the mainstream global practice. However, its high infection rate is still an inevitable fact. China was the first country to adopt the zero-tolerance approach to deal with COVID-19 and successfully control it. Due to its immediate effects and low infection rates, this approach has been used in China until now. Through the co-operation of the government and community, China has achieved precise regional lockdowns and patient identification. This article uses the CBCM model to interpret how China has achieved its zero-tolerance approach. Finally, the secondary hazards and applicability of China's CBCM model are discussed. This article draws the following conclusions: (1) China's CBCM basically replicates Singapore's crisis management model for SARS. With the co-operation of the community, it achieved universal coverage of prevention, detection and control; (2) Government leadership in dealing with major crises is very important; (3) In addition to relying on the extreme power of the government to realize China's CBCM model, the two major factors of a submissive society and collectivism have played an important role; (4) China's CBCM model is essentially an excessive anti-pandemic strategy.

摘要

目前,零容忍和共存是管理 COVID-19 的两个基本概念。随着疫苗接种率的提高和大流行对人们生活的持续影响,共存方法已成为全球主流实践。然而,其高感染率仍然是一个不可避免的事实。中国是第一个采用零容忍方法来应对 COVID-19 并成功控制它的国家。由于其立竿见影的效果和低感染率,这种方法在中国一直沿用至今。通过政府和社区的合作,中国实现了精确的区域封锁和患者识别。本文使用 CBCM 模型来解释中国是如何实现零容忍方法的。最后,讨论了中国 CBCM 模型的次生危害和适用性。本文得出以下结论:(1)中国的 CBCM 基本上复制了新加坡应对 SARS 的危机管理模式。通过社区合作,实现了预防、检测和控制的全覆盖;(2)政府在应对重大危机方面的领导作用非常重要;(3)除了依赖政府的极端权力来实现中国的 CBCM 模式外,顺从社会和集体主义这两个主要因素也发挥了重要作用;(4)中国的 CBCM 模式本质上是一种过度的抗疫策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fd/9353073/8a193343132a/fpubh-10-880479-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fd/9353073/3b84c8c44fca/fpubh-10-880479-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fd/9353073/8a193343132a/fpubh-10-880479-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fd/9353073/3b84c8c44fca/fpubh-10-880479-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fd/9353073/8a193343132a/fpubh-10-880479-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
China's community-based crisis management model for COVID-19: A zero-tolerance approach.中国的社区层面新冠疫情危机管理模式:零容忍策略。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:880479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.880479. eCollection 2022.
2
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
3
Development, Status Quo, and Challenges to China's Health Informatization During COVID-19: Evaluation and Recommendations.新冠疫情下中国卫生信息化的发展、现状与挑战:评估与建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 17;23(6):e27345. doi: 10.2196/27345.
4
COVID-19 emergencies around the globe: China's experience in controlling COVID-19 and lessons learned.全球 COVID-19 紧急情况:中国控制 COVID-19 的经验和教训。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 20;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa143.
5
China's COVID-19 Control Strategy and Its Impact on the Global Pandemic.中国的新冠疫情防控策略及其对全球大流行的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;10:857003. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857003. eCollection 2022.
6
Study on the Experience of Public Health System Construction in China's COVID-19 Prevention.中国新冠疫情防控公共卫生体系建设经验研究
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;9:610824. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.610824. eCollection 2021.
7
Measuring the Market Power of China's Medical Product Exports.测算中国医疗产品出口的市场势力
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;10:875104. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.875104. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing the nexus between COVID-19 pandemic-driven economic crisis and economic policy: lesson learned and challenges.评估 COVID-19 大流行引发的经济危机与经济政策之间的关系:经验教训和挑战。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22145-22158. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23650-0. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
The Power of Positive Reporting: Examining China's Anti-Epidemic National Image in Mainstream Media.正面报道的力量:审视主流媒体中的中国抗疫国家形象
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Dec;52(6):2047-2073. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09979-8. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
10
Evaluation of China's public health system response to COVID-19.评价中国公共卫生体系应对 COVID-19 的表现。
J Glob Health. 2021 Jan 16;11:05004. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.05004.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the psychometric evidence of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) between Spanish and Chinese primary schoolteachers: insights from classical test theory and rasch analysis.西班牙和中国小学教师抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21(DASS-21)的心理测量学证据比较:来自经典测验理论和拉施分析的见解
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 29;13(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02728-7.
2
Relationship between Internet use and offline leisure activities among Chinese older adult people: a moderated mediation model.中国老年人互联网使用与线下休闲活动之间的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;12:1458413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1458413. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
2
In fighting common threats, people's deep commitment to taking collective action matters: examples from China's COVID-19 battle and her other combats.在应对共同威胁时,人们对采取集体行动的坚定承诺至关重要:来自中国抗击新冠疫情及其他斗争的例证。
Socioecol Pract Res. 2020;2(3):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s42532-020-00056-1. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
"One of My Basic Necessities of Life Is Work. That's Just Broken Away."-Explorative Triangulation of Personal and Work-Related Impacts for Supervisors and Disabled Employees in German Social Firms during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
The effect of social support on home isolation anxiety and depression among college students in the post-pandemic era: the mediating effect of perceived loss of control and the moderating role of family socioeconomic status.
后疫情时代社会支持对大学生居家隔离焦虑和抑郁的影响:家庭社会经济地位的调节作用及控制感丧失的中介作用
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;12:1288848. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1288848. eCollection 2024.
4
Physical exercise/sports ameliorate the internet addiction from college students during the pandemic of COVID-19 in China.体育锻炼/运动改善了中国 COVID-19 大流行期间大学生的网瘾。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;11:1310213. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1310213. eCollection 2023.
5
Infection status and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in maintenance hemodialysis patients in Wuhan during the omicron pandemic.奥密克戎疫情期间武汉维持性血液透析患者 COVID-19 的感染状况和临床特征。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e35063. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035063.
“工作是我生活的基本必需品之一。但现在一切都被打破了。”-德国社会企业在 COVID-19 大流行期间对主管和残疾员工的个人和工作相关影响的探索性三角剖分。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178979.
4
Defining covid-19 elimination.定义新冠病毒 19 的消除。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 15;374:n1794. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1794.
5
Elimination could be the optimal response strategy for covid-19 and other emerging pandemic diseases.消除可能是应对新冠疫情及其他新出现的大流行疾病的最佳应对策略。
BMJ. 2020 Dec 22;371:m4907. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4907.
6
Prematurity Rates During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia.澳大利亚墨尔本 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行封锁期间的早产率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar 1;137(3):405-407. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004236.
7
Application of Big Data Technology for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: Lessons and Recommendations.大数据技术在中国新冠肺炎疫情防控中的应用:经验与建议
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e21980. doi: 10.2196/21980.
8
The importance of wearing masks in curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic.佩戴口罩在遏制新冠疫情中的重要性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2606-2607. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_578_20. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Coproducing Responses to COVID-19 with Community-Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China.与社区组织共同应对新冠疫情:来自中国浙江省的经验教训。
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Sep-Oct;80(5):866-873. doi: 10.1111/puar.13244. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
10
COVID-19 lockdown impact on lifestyle habits of Italian adults.新冠疫情封锁对意大利成年人生活习惯的影响。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 20;91(9-S):87-89. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10122.