School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.
School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:880479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.880479. eCollection 2022.
At present, the zero-tolerance and co-existence approaches are the two basic concepts used to manage COVID-19. With the increase in vaccination rates and the continuing impact of the pandemic on people's lives, the co-existence approach has become the mainstream global practice. However, its high infection rate is still an inevitable fact. China was the first country to adopt the zero-tolerance approach to deal with COVID-19 and successfully control it. Due to its immediate effects and low infection rates, this approach has been used in China until now. Through the co-operation of the government and community, China has achieved precise regional lockdowns and patient identification. This article uses the CBCM model to interpret how China has achieved its zero-tolerance approach. Finally, the secondary hazards and applicability of China's CBCM model are discussed. This article draws the following conclusions: (1) China's CBCM basically replicates Singapore's crisis management model for SARS. With the co-operation of the community, it achieved universal coverage of prevention, detection and control; (2) Government leadership in dealing with major crises is very important; (3) In addition to relying on the extreme power of the government to realize China's CBCM model, the two major factors of a submissive society and collectivism have played an important role; (4) China's CBCM model is essentially an excessive anti-pandemic strategy.
目前,零容忍和共存是管理 COVID-19 的两个基本概念。随着疫苗接种率的提高和大流行对人们生活的持续影响,共存方法已成为全球主流实践。然而,其高感染率仍然是一个不可避免的事实。中国是第一个采用零容忍方法来应对 COVID-19 并成功控制它的国家。由于其立竿见影的效果和低感染率,这种方法在中国一直沿用至今。通过政府和社区的合作,中国实现了精确的区域封锁和患者识别。本文使用 CBCM 模型来解释中国是如何实现零容忍方法的。最后,讨论了中国 CBCM 模型的次生危害和适用性。本文得出以下结论:(1)中国的 CBCM 基本上复制了新加坡应对 SARS 的危机管理模式。通过社区合作,实现了预防、检测和控制的全覆盖;(2)政府在应对重大危机方面的领导作用非常重要;(3)除了依赖政府的极端权力来实现中国的 CBCM 模式外,顺从社会和集体主义这两个主要因素也发挥了重要作用;(4)中国的 CBCM 模式本质上是一种过度的抗疫策略。