Micula Andreea, Rönnberg Jerker, Zhang Yue, Ng Elaine Hoi Ning
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Oticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 22;16:876807. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.876807. eCollection 2022.
Despite the evidence of a positive relationship between task demands and listening effort, the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) highlights the important role of arousal on an individual's choice to engage in challenging listening tasks. Previous studies have interpreted physiological responses in conjunction with behavioral responses as markers of task engagement. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of potential changes in physiological arousal, indexed by the pupil baseline, on task engagement over the course of an auditory recall test. Furthermore, the aim was to investigate whether working memory (WM) capacity and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which the test was conducted had an effect on changes in arousal. Twenty-one adult hearing aid users with mild to moderately severe symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss were included. The pupil baseline was measured during the Sentence-final Word Identification and Recall (SWIR) test, which was administered in a background noise composed of sixteen talkers. The Reading Span (RS) test was used as a measure of WM capacity. The findings showed that the pupil baseline decreased over the course of the SWIR test. However, recall performance remained stable, indicating that the participants maintained the necessary engagement level required to perform the task. These findings were interpreted as a decline in arousal as a result of task habituation. There was no effect of WM capacity or individual SNR level on the change in pupil baseline over time. A significant interaction was found between WM capacity and SNR level on the overall mean pupil baseline. Individuals with higher WM capacity exhibited an overall larger mean pupil baseline at low SNR levels compared to individuals with poorer WM capacity. This may be related to the ability of individuals with higher WM capacity to perform better than individual with poorer WM capacity in challenging listening conditions.
尽管有证据表明任务需求与听力努力之间存在正相关关系,但“理解听力努力框架”(FUEL)强调了唤醒对个体选择参与具有挑战性的听力任务的重要作用。先前的研究将生理反应与行为反应结合起来解释为任务参与的标志。本研究的目的是调查以瞳孔基线为指标的生理唤醒潜在变化对听觉回忆测试过程中任务参与的影响。此外,目的是调查工作记忆(WM)容量和测试时的信噪比(SNR)是否对唤醒变化有影响。纳入了21名患有轻度至中度重度对称性感音神经性听力损失的成年助听器使用者。在句子末尾单词识别与回忆(SWIR)测试期间测量瞳孔基线,该测试在由16名说话者组成的背景噪声中进行。阅读广度(RS)测试用作WM容量的度量。研究结果表明,在SWIR测试过程中瞳孔基线下降。然而,回忆表现保持稳定,这表明参与者保持了执行任务所需的必要参与水平。这些发现被解释为由于任务习惯化导致的唤醒下降。WM容量或个体SNR水平对瞳孔基线随时间的变化没有影响。在总体平均瞳孔基线上发现WM容量和SNR水平之间存在显著交互作用。与WM容量较差的个体相比,WM容量较高的个体在低SNR水平下总体平均瞳孔基线更大。这可能与WM容量较高的个体在具有挑战性的听力条件下比WM容量较差的个体表现更好的能力有关。