• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.肺癌和卵巢癌幸存者的心理社会困扰筛查和管理中的差异。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1704-e1715. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00078. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Diving deeper into distress screening implementation in oncology care.深入探讨肿瘤护理中困境筛查的实施。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(6):645-660. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2250774. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection.与医疗机构合作,了解癌症幸存者的心理社会困扰筛查实践:对研究设计、招募和数据收集的试点研究意义
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5.
4
Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer.美国癌症委员会认证的医疗机构中的癌症生存护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18736.
5
Online description of services provided in adult survivorship programs across U.S. accredited cancer centers.美国认可的癌症中心成人幸存者项目所提供服务的在线描述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Feb;18(1):79-83. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
6
Supporting commission on cancer-mandated psychosocial distress screening with implementation strategies.支持癌症委员会强制要求的心理社会痛苦筛查及实施策略。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e413-20. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002816. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
7
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in adherence to preventive health services for ovarian cancer survivors.种族和社会经济差异对卵巢癌幸存者预防保健服务的遵从性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):512-522. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00771-z. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.美国癌症委员会批准与未批准医院的比较:对使用国家癌症数据库的研究的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4177-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7018. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
9
Using the science of psychosocial care to implement the new american college of surgeons commission on cancer distress screening standard.运用心理社会关怀科学实施美国外科医师学会癌症困扰筛查新标准。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Feb 1;11(2):214-21. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0028.
10
Sociodemographic disparities in advanced ovarian cancer survival and adherence to treatment guidelines.晚期卵巢癌生存率及治疗指南依从性方面的社会人口学差异
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):833-842. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000643.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for Psychosocial Distress: A Brief Review with Implications for Oncology Nursing.心理社会困扰筛查:简要综述及其对肿瘤护理的启示
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;12(21):2167. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212167.
2
Substance use and help seeking as coping behaviors among parents and unpaid caregivers of adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,美国成年人的父母及无薪照料者将物质使用和寻求帮助作为应对行为。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2024 Nov;50(6):851-863. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2394970. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Elucidating the influences of social determinants of health on perceived overall health among African American/Black and Hispanic ovarian cancer survivors using the NIH All of Us Research Program.利用美国国立卫生研究院的“所有人研究计划”,阐明社会健康决定因素对非裔美国/黑人及西班牙裔卵巢癌幸存者整体健康感知的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Oct;189:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.027. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Causes of death among people living with metastatic cancer.转移性癌症患者的死因
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 19;15(1):1519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45307-x.
5
Diving deeper into distress screening implementation in oncology care.深入探讨肿瘤护理中困境筛查的实施。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(6):645-660. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2250774. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
Incidence, Timing, and Factors Associated With Suicide Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer in the US.美国癌症手术患者自杀的发生率、时间和相关因素。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):308-315. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6549.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of psychological intervention for depression, anxiety, and distress in prostate cancer: a systematic review of literature.心理干预对前列腺癌患者抑郁、焦虑和痛苦的有效性:文献系统评价。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):674-687. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00342-3. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection.与医疗机构合作,了解癌症幸存者的心理社会困扰筛查实践:对研究设计、招募和数据收集的试点研究意义
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5.
3
Oncology social work intervention index (OSWii): An instrument to measure oncology social work interventions to advance research.肿瘤社会工作干预指数(OSWii):一种衡量肿瘤社会工作干预以推进研究的工具。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(2):143-160. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1857897. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Identifying patient-level factors associated with interest in psychosocial services during cancer: A brief report.确定癌症患者对心理社会服务感兴趣的相关因素:简要报告。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(5):686-693. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1837329. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis.少数族裔和多数族裔常见精神障碍的污名:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;20(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3.
6
Calidad de Vida: a systematic review of quality of life in Latino cancer survivors in the USA.生活质量:美国拉丁裔癌症幸存者生活质量的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Oct;29(10):2615-2630. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02527-0. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Lung Cancer Incidence in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties - United States, 2007-2016.非都会和都会县的肺癌发病率-美国,2007-2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 8;68(44):993-998. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6844a1.
8
Insight Medicine Lacks - The Continuing Relevance of Henrietta Lacks.医学洞察的缺失——海瑞塔·拉克斯的持续意义
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):800-801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1905346.
9
Towards a More Inclusive and Dynamic Understanding of Medical Mistrust Informed by Science.从科学角度理解更具包容性和活力的医学不信任
Behav Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):79-85. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511.
10
Distress among African American and White adults with cancer in Louisiana.路易斯安那州非裔美国人和白人成年癌症患者的痛苦。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 Jan-Feb;38(1):63-72. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2019.1634176. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

肺癌和卵巢癌幸存者的心理社会困扰筛查和管理中的差异。

Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Arizona Department of Public Health, Phoenix, AZ.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1704-e1715. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00078. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1200/OP.22.00078
PMID:35939778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9835932/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Since 2016, the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer (CoC) has required routine distress screening (DS) of cancer survivors treated in their accredited facilities to facilitate early identification of survivors with psychosocial concerns. Lung and ovarian cancer survivors have relatively low 5-year survival rates and may experience high levels of distress. We examined the extent to which ovarian and lung cancer survivors received CoC-mandated DS and whether DS disparities exist on the basis of diagnosis, sociodemographic factors, or facility geography (urban/rural).

METHODS

This study included a quantitative review of DS documentation and follow-up services provided using existing electronic health records (EHRs). We worked with 21 CoC-accredited facilities across the United States and examined EHRs of 2,258 survivors from these facilities (1,618 lung cancer survivors and 640 ovarian cancer survivors) diagnosed in 2016 or 2017.

RESULTS

Documentation of DS was found in half (54.8%) of the EHRs reviewed. Disparities existed across race/ethnicity, cancer type and stage, and facility characteristics. Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander survivors were screened at lower percentages than other survivors. Patients with ovarian cancer, those diagnosed at earlier stages, and survivors in urban facilities had relatively low percentages of DS. Non-Hispanic Black survivors were more likely than non-Hispanic White survivors to decline further psychosocial services.

CONCLUSION

Despite the mandate for routine DS in CoC-accredited oncology programs, gaps remain in how many and which survivors are screened for distress. Improvements in DS processes to enhance access to DS and appropriate psychosocial care could benefit cancer survivors. Collaboration with CoC during this study led to improvement of their processes for collecting DS data for measuring standard adherence.

摘要

目的

自 2016 年以来,美国外科医师学会癌症委员会(CoC)要求在其认可的设施中对接受治疗的癌症幸存者进行常规痛苦筛查(DS),以方便早期发现有心理社会问题的幸存者。肺癌和卵巢癌幸存者的 5 年生存率相对较低,可能经历较高水平的痛苦。我们研究了卵巢癌和肺癌幸存者接受 CoC 规定的 DS 的程度,以及根据诊断、社会人口统计学因素或设施地理位置(城市/农村)是否存在 DS 差异。

方法

本研究包括对使用现有电子健康记录(EHR)提供的 DS 文档和随访服务进行定量审查。我们与美国 21 家 CoC 认可的机构合作,检查了这些机构的 2258 名幸存者的 EHR(1618 名肺癌幸存者和 640 名卵巢癌幸存者),这些幸存者于 2016 年或 2017 年被诊断为癌症。

结果

在审查的 EHR 中,有一半(54.8%)记录了 DS。在种族/族裔、癌症类型和分期以及设施特征方面存在差异。西班牙裔/拉丁裔和亚裔/太平洋岛裔幸存者的筛查率较低。卵巢癌患者、早期诊断患者和城市设施中的幸存者的 DS 筛查率相对较低。非西班牙裔黑人幸存者比非西班牙裔白人幸存者更有可能拒绝进一步的心理社会服务。

结论

尽管 CoC 认可的肿瘤学项目中规定了常规 DS,但仍存在有多少幸存者和哪些幸存者接受痛苦筛查的问题。改进 DS 流程以增加对 DS 和适当心理社会护理的获取,可以使癌症幸存者受益。在这项研究中与 CoC 的合作导致了他们改进了收集 DS 数据以衡量标准依从性的流程。