Zhang Shuai, Liu Yubo, Ma Mingyang, Cao Zheng, Kong Xiangpeng, Chai Wei
Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China; Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China.
Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China; School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan;38(1):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for fibrous-fused hips is technically demanding. This study aimed to evaluate the precision and accuracy, as well as the rate of conversion of robotic-assisted THA in such difficult patients.
We retrospectively analyzed 67 patients (84 hips) who underwent THA with fibrous-fused hips between August 2018 and June 2021 at our institution. Demographics, acetabular cup positioning, leg-length discrepancies, and postoperative Harris hip scores were recorded for all patients. Thirty-six patients (44 hips) who underwent robotic-assisted THA and 31 patients (40 hips) who underwent manual THA were enrolled in this study.
The robot accurately executed the preoperative plan, and there were no statistically significant differences between the preoperative planned anteversion, inclination, and postoperative measurements. In the robotic group, the percentage of acetabular cups in the safe zone was significantly higher than in the manual group (87.2 versus 55%, respectively, P = .042). The rate of conversion to manual THA for various reasons in the robotic-assisted THA group was 11.4% (5/44). Compared with manual THA, the mean increase in operative time for conversion from robotic-assisted to manual THA was 24 min (P < .001).
In patients who have fibrous-fused hips, preoperative planning can be accurately executed by robotic-assisted technology. Compared with manual THA, robotic-assisted THA had a remarkable advantage in improving the frequency of achieving cup positioning within the target zone. Overall, robotic-assisted technology was helpful in such difficult cases, and the approximately 11.4% of cases converted to manual THA are reminders that surgeons should be thoroughly prepared preoperatively.
对于纤维性融合髋关节行全髋关节置换术(THA)在技术上具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估机器人辅助THA在这类复杂患者中的精确性、准确性以及转换率。
我们回顾性分析了2018年8月至2021年6月在我院接受纤维性融合髋关节THA的67例患者(84髋)。记录所有患者的人口统计学数据、髋臼杯位置、肢体长度差异以及术后Harris髋关节评分。本研究纳入了36例(44髋)接受机器人辅助THA的患者和31例(40髋)接受人工THA的患者。
机器人准确执行了术前计划,术前计划的前倾角、倾斜度与术后测量值之间无统计学显著差异。在机器人组中,髋臼杯位于安全区的百分比显著高于人工组(分别为87.2%和55%,P = 0.042)。机器人辅助THA组因各种原因转换为人工THA的比例为11.4%(5/44)。与人工THA相比,从机器人辅助转换为人工THA的平均手术时间增加了24分钟(P < 0.001)。
对于纤维性融合髋关节的患者,机器人辅助技术可准确执行术前计划。与人工THA相比,机器人辅助THA在提高髋臼杯位于目标区域内的频率方面具有显著优势。总体而言,机器人辅助技术在这类复杂病例中是有帮助的,约11.4%的病例转换为人工THA提醒外科医生应在术前做好充分准备。