Suppr超能文献

机器人手臂辅助系统提高了发育不良髋关节非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置和方向的准确性:手动放置、基于计算机断层扫描的导航和机器人手术组之间的比较。

Robotic Arm-Assisted System Improved Accuracy of Cup Position and Orientation in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Dysplastic Hips: A Comparison Among Groups With Manual Placement, Computed Tomography-Based Navigation, and Robotic Surgery.

作者信息

Konishi Toshiki, Sato Taishi, Hamai Satoshi, Kawahara Shinya, Hara Daisuke, Nakashima Yasuharu

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 20;28:101461. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101461. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with dysplasia is challenging due to the distinctive bone deformities. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cup placement position and orientation across robotic arm-assisted systems (R-THA), computed tomography-based navigation (N-THA), and manual procedure (M-THA) in THA for osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia.

METHODS

A total of 167 patients (197 hips), including 88 R-THAs, 45 N-THAs, and 46 M-THAs, were analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed to align the patient backgrounds. Horizontal and vertical centers of rotation were measured for cup position, whereas radiographic inclination and anteversion were measured for cup orientation. The proportion of cases with cup placement within 3 mm and 5° from the target was compared.

RESULTS

R-THA had a significantly higher percentage of cup placement within 3 mm of the target compared to N-THA (78% vs 49%;  = .0041) and M-THA (78% vs 53%;  = .013). Similarly, R-THA was significantly more successful in placing the cup within 5° of the target compared to N-THA (84% vs 58%;  = .0049) and M-THA (91% vs 20%; < .0001). Moreover, N-THA was significantly better at placing the cup within 5° of the target compared to M-THA (62% vs 14%; < .0001), whereas there was no significant difference in the percentage of cup placement within 3 mm of the target (51% vs 51%;  = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation improved accuracy in cup orientation compared to the manual procedure. Additionally, the robotic arm-assisted system further improved cup position accuracy.

摘要

背景

发育异常患者行全髋关节置换术(THA)时,由于独特的骨骼畸形,髋臼杯的准确放置具有挑战性。本研究旨在比较机器人手臂辅助系统(R-THA)、基于计算机断层扫描的导航系统(N-THA)和手工操作(M-THA)在发育异常继发骨关节炎的THA中髋臼杯放置位置和方向的准确性。

方法

共分析了167例患者(197髋),其中包括88例R-THA、45例N-THA和46例M-THA。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡患者背景。测量髋臼杯位置的水平和垂直旋转中心,而测量髋臼杯方向的影像学倾斜度和前倾角。比较髋臼杯放置在距目标3 mm和5°范围内的病例比例。

结果

与N-THA(78%对49%;P = .0041)和M-THA(78%对53%;P = .013)相比,R-THA髋臼杯放置在距目标3 mm范围内的百分比显著更高。同样,与N-THA(84%对58%;P = .0049)和M-THA(91%对20%;P < .0001)相比,R-THA将髋臼杯放置在距目标5°范围内明显更成功。此外,与M-THA相比,N-THA在将髋臼杯放置在距目标5°范围内明显更好(62%对14%;P < .0001),而髋臼杯放置在距目标3 mm范围内的百分比无显著差异(51%对51%;P = 1.0)。

结论

与手工操作相比,机器人手臂辅助系统和基于计算机断层扫描的导航提高了髋臼杯方向的准确性。此外,机器人手臂辅助系统进一步提高了髋臼杯位置的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验