• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Financial interventions for family caregivers of individuals with chronic illness: a scoping review protocol.财务干预措施对慢性病患者家庭照顾者的影响:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 10;12(8):e061667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061667.
2
Implementation and dissemination of home and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review protocol.实施和推广针对痴呆症患者非正式照护者的家庭和社区干预措施:系统范围界定综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e052324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052324.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Identifying the burdens for informal caregivers of tracheostomy-dependent people: a scoping review protocol.确定气管造口依赖者非正式照护者的负担:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e090819. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090819.
5
Family participation in dignity interventions for patients with cancer receiving palliative care: a scoping review protocol.家庭参与对接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的尊严干预:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e090338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090338.
6
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
7
Interventions to integrate care for people with serious mental illness and substance use disorders: a systematic scoping review protocol.干预措施以整合严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍患者的护理:系统范围界定综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 30;9(10):e031122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031122.
8
Understanding on the association between informal caregiver characteristics and cognitive function of adults with cancer: a scoping review protocol.理解照顾者特征与癌症成人认知功能之间的关联:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e031842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031842.
9
Trauma-informed family carer education and practical skills training in dementia: a systematic scoping review protocol.痴呆症中创伤知情的家庭照顾者教育与实践技能培训:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e090202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090202.
10
Vocational rehabilitation for mental health service users with chronic mental illness in low-income to upper-middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.中低收入国家慢性精神疾病精神卫生服务使用者的职业康复:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):e047781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047781.

引用本文的文献

1
Lived experiences of caregivers with a family member living with a severe mental health condition in South Africa.在南非,照顾患有严重精神健康问题家庭成员的照料者的生活经历。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06989-9.
2
A multicenter cross-sectional study on factors associated with caregiving appraisal in pediatric acute leukemia caregivers.一项关于小儿急性白血病照顾者照顾负担评估相关因素的多中心横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0324589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324589. eCollection 2025.
3
Economic Value of Unpaid Family Caregiver Time Following Hospital Discharge and at End of Life.经济价值:住院出院后和临终时无偿家庭护理人员时间
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):632-640.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.030. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Community intervention strategies to reduce the impact of financial strain and promote financial well-being: a comprehensive rapid review.社区干预策略,以减轻经济压力的影响,促进财务健康:全面快速审查。
Glob Health Promot. 2021 Mar;28(1):42-50. doi: 10.1177/1757975920984182. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Progress Notes: Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach.病程记录:研究证据综合的方法:范围综述法
J Hosp Med. 2019 Jul 1;14(7):416-418. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3248. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
Work-Related Opportunity Costs Of Providing Unpaid Family Care In 2013 And 2050.2013 年和 2050 年提供无偿家庭护理的工作相关机会成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):1003-1010. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00008.
4
Caregiver Care.照护者照护。
Am Fam Physician. 2019 Jun 1;99(11):699-706.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
The Psychosocial Implications of Managing Work and Family Caregiving Roles: Gender Differences Among Information Technology Professionals.兼顾工作与家庭照料角色的社会心理影响:信息技术专业人员中的性别差异
J Fam Issues. 2017 Aug;38(11):1495-1519. doi: 10.1177/0192513X15584680. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology.皮肤科系统评价者使用的手动检索方法。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):302-304. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.009.
8
The Relationship Between Family Caregiving and the Mental Health of Emerging Young Adult Caregivers.家庭照顾与新兴成年照顾者心理健康之间的关系。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct;44(4):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s11414-016-9526-7.
9
Caregiving strain and all-cause mortality: evidence from the REGARDS study.照料者压力与全因死亡率:来自 REGARDS 研究的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jul;68(4):504-12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs084. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
10
Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients.癌症患者成年家属的照料负担、压力和健康影响。
JAMA. 2012 Jan 25;307(4):398-403. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.29.

财务干预措施对慢性病患者家庭照顾者的影响:系统评价方案

Financial interventions for family caregivers of individuals with chronic illness: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin Dell Seton Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA

School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin Dell Seton Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 10;12(8):e061667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061667.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061667
PMID:35948374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379508/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are 53 million caregivers in the USA providing informal care for individuals with chronic illnesses. These caregivers contribute significantly to the healthcare system, yet they may experience adverse consequences due to caregiving, including financial burden. The purpose of this scoping review is to fill a research gap on understanding the nature and effect of financial interventions for family caregivers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will use the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework to systematically search for articles in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Dissertations & Theses Global, and Web of Science during April 2022. Articles published from 1997 to the present will be included for the review. Data from articles will be extracted and summarised for financial intervention nature, scope, measurement, effect and health system context.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not include human subjects; therefore, no ethical review will be undertaken. Findings will be disseminated in scholarly journals and at caregiving and ageing conferences, such as the Gerontological Society of America.

摘要

简介

美国有 5300 万护理人员为慢性病患者提供非正式护理。这些护理人员为医疗保健系统做出了重大贡献,但由于护理工作,他们可能会经历不利后果,包括经济负担。本范围综述的目的是填补理解家庭护理人员经济干预措施的性质和效果方面的研究空白。

方法和分析

本研究将使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 范围综述框架,于 2022 年 4 月在 MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL Complete、Cochrane Library、PsycINFO、Dissertations & Theses Global 和 Web of Science 中系统地搜索文章。将纳入 1997 年至今发表的文章进行综述。将从文章中提取和总结财务干预措施的性质、范围、测量、效果和卫生系统背景。

伦理和传播

本研究不包括人类受试者;因此,无需进行伦理审查。研究结果将在学术期刊和护理及老龄化会议上发表,如美国老年学学会。