• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于小儿急性白血病照顾者照顾负担评估相关因素的多中心横断面研究。

A multicenter cross-sectional study on factors associated with caregiving appraisal in pediatric acute leukemia caregivers.

作者信息

Ouru Phoebe Abonyo, Zheng Hong, Lin Zhi, Yang Minghua

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Hunan Clinical Research Center of Pediatric Cancer, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0324589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324589. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324589
PMID:40478907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12143579/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Caring for pediatric acute leukemia (PAL) patients poses significant psychological challenges for family caregivers, impacting their well-being and caregiving capacity. This multicenter study aimed to assess caregivers' perception of their caregiving role using the revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale (rCAS) and identify factors associated with negative and positive caregiving appraisals among caregivers of children with PAL.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted across three hospitals affiliated with Central South University. The 4-domain rCAS assessed both positive (satisfaction, mastery) and negative (burden, environmental impact) caregiving appraisals. Patient clinical data as well as demographics of both patients and caregivers were used to perform univariate, correlation, and multivariate regression analyses, identifying predictors of caregiver psychological distress.

RESULTS

Out of 111 recruited caregivers, 101 valid responses were analyzed. Univariate subgroup analysis showed that several caregiver- and patient-related factors were significantly associated with increased caregiver burden and environmental impact. For mastery and satisfaction, some factors were associated with higher appraisal scores while others were related to significantly lower scores. Correlation analysis showed that patient discomfort and difficulties significantly correlated with both negative and positive appraisals. The regression models revealed that the independent influencing factors contributed to about 23.9% of caregiver-perceived negative impact (P = 0.024) and 30.3% of caregiver-perceived positive impact (P < 0.001). Patient worry (P = 0.024), communication difficulties (P = 0.011), relationship to the patient (P = 0.017), and medical insurance type (P = 0.035) predicted negative appraisals while pain (P = 0.008), anxiety about surgical procedures (P = 0.022), relationship to the patient (P = 0.031), and caregiver educational level (P = 0.023) predicted positive appraisals.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers of pediatric acute leukemia experience considerable psychological strain. Despite these challenges, some caregivers report significantly higher positive appraisals. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce caregiver burden and enhance positive caregiving outcomes.

摘要

引言

照顾小儿急性白血病(PAL)患者给家庭照顾者带来了巨大的心理挑战,影响他们的幸福感和照顾能力。这项多中心研究旨在使用修订后的照顾评估量表(rCAS)评估照顾者对其照顾角色的认知,并确定与PAL患儿照顾者负面和正面照顾评估相关的因素。

方法

在中南大学附属的三家医院进行了横断面调查。4个维度的rCAS评估了正面(满意度、掌控感)和负面(负担、环境影响)照顾评估。患者临床数据以及患者和照顾者的人口统计学信息用于进行单因素、相关性和多因素回归分析,以确定照顾者心理困扰的预测因素。

结果

在111名招募的照顾者中,分析了101份有效回复。单因素亚组分析表明,几个与照顾者和患者相关的因素与照顾者负担增加和环境影响显著相关。对于掌控感和满意度,一些因素与较高的评估得分相关,而其他因素则与显著较低的得分相关。相关性分析表明,患者的不适和困难与负面和正面评估均显著相关。回归模型显示,独立影响因素对照顾者感知到的负面影响贡献约23.9%(P = 0.024),对照顾者感知到的正面影响贡献30.3%(P < 0.001)。患者的担忧(P = 0.024)、沟通困难(P = 0.011)、与患者的关系(P = 0.017)和医疗保险类型(P = 0.035)预测负面评估,而疼痛(P = 0.008)、对手术程序的焦虑(P = 0.022)、与患者的关系(P = 0.031)和照顾者教育水平(P = 0.023)预测正面评估。

结论

小儿急性白血病患者的照顾者经历了相当大的心理压力。尽管存在这些挑战,但一些照顾者报告的正面评估明显更高。需要有针对性的干预措施来减轻照顾者负担并提高正面照顾结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc28/12143579/6d426c261aa4/pone.0324589.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc28/12143579/6d426c261aa4/pone.0324589.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc28/12143579/6d426c261aa4/pone.0324589.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A multicenter cross-sectional study on factors associated with caregiving appraisal in pediatric acute leukemia caregivers.一项关于小儿急性白血病照顾者照顾负担评估相关因素的多中心横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0324589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324589. eCollection 2025.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
5
": A Mixed Methods Investigation of Employment, Stigma, and Financial Hardship Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Caregivers.《LGBTQ+癌症护理者的就业、耻辱感和经济困难的混合方法调查》
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251351105. doi: 10.1177/10732748251351105. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
6
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.
7
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
8
Development of a Mobile App to Support Head and Neck Cancer Caregiving: Mixed Methods Study.开发一款支持头颈癌护理的移动应用程序:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 10;11:e66471. doi: 10.2196/66471.
9
Assessing caregiver burden: the role of assistive devices and identification of assistive device needs.评估照料者负担:辅助设备的作用及辅助设备需求的确定
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jul;20(5):1395-1402. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2449998. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
10
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.2022年中国癌症发病率与死亡率
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Feb 2;4(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
The impact of caregiver burden on quality of life in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a moderated mediation analysis of the role of psychological distress and family resilience.照顾者负担对晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者生活质量的影响:心理困扰和家庭弹性作用的中介调节分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 15;24(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18321-3.
3
Quality of life of caregivers at the end of their child's pediatric cancer treatment: cancer-specific worry and material hardship.
患儿癌症治疗结束时照顾者的生活质量:癌症特有的担忧和物质困难。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 May 16;49(5):348-355. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae014.
4
Caregiver health literacy and health task performance: Findings from the LitCog caregiver cohort study.照护者的健康素养与健康任务表现:LitCog照护者队列研究的结果
PEC Innov. 2023 Dec 5;3:100240. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100240. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
5
Impact of childhood and adolescence cancer on family caregivers: a qualitative analysis of strains, resources and coping behaviours.儿童和青少年癌症对家庭照顾者的影响:压力、资源和应对行为的定性分析。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 28;11(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01406-w.
6
Positive aspects of caregiving among informal caregivers of persons with dementia in the Asian context: a qualitative study.在亚洲背景下,痴呆症患者非专业照护者的积极照护方面:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03767-8.
7
Determinants of delayed childhood cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家儿童癌症治疗延误的决定因素:系统评价。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Mar;70(3):e30175. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30175. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
8
Transcultural adaptation of the revised caregiving appraisal scale (RCAS) in the Spanish population.修订后的照顾者评估量表(RCAS)在西班牙语人群中的跨文化适应。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12506. doi: 10.1111/opn.12506. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Financial interventions for family caregivers of individuals with chronic illness: a scoping review protocol.财务干预措施对慢性病患者家庭照顾者的影响:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 10;12(8):e061667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061667.
10
Care burden and associated factors in caregivers of children with cancer.癌症患儿照顾者的负担及其相关因素。
Ital J Pediatr. 2022 Jun 13;48(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13052-022-01291-w.