• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量人工耳蜗植入术前、术中及术后皮肤厚度的方法。

Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants.

作者信息

Zaubitzer Lena, Schaefer Elena, Wallhaeuser-Franke Elisabeth, Burkart Johannes, Herrmann Katrin, Walter Beatrice, Schell Angela, Scherl Claudia, Servais Jérôme, Haeussler Daniel

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Otol. 2022 Apr;17(2):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001
PMID:35949548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349019/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).

METHODS

The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.

RESULTS

Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457-0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.

CONCLUSION

All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定是否存在一种可靠的方法,用于测量人工耳蜗植入术前、术中和术后耳后皮肤的厚度,以便评估人工耳蜗(CI)外部磁体的最佳作用力。

方法

使用三种不同方法测量了83例接受人工耳蜗植入患者的耳后皮肤厚度。在术前和术后CT图像上以及术中测量厚度。记录外科医生在开机时和首次随访期间选择的磁体类别。对不同的皮肤厚度测量值以及皮肤厚度与磁体强度类别之间进行相关性分析。

结果

直到随访时,只有6例患者需要更换磁体。虽然三种测量方法的中位绝对厚度差异显著(p < 0.0001),但其厚度值显示出高度显著的相关性(Pearson相关系数r = 0.457 - 0.585;p < 0.01)。此外,磁体强度与手术前、后及术中测定的皮瓣厚度显著相关。术中针测法与磁体强度的相关性最低。

结论

所有三种测量方法都为确定理想磁力提供了合适的基础。然而,特别值得关注的是术前和术后的CT测量。前者能够早期评估所需的磁体强度,从而及时在术后提供,而后者有助于估计随访期间降低磁体强度的必要性以及早期开机的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/1b4fdfe23499/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/fe820ab15055/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/6ed091069985/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/bc0203411717/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/1b4fdfe23499/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/fe820ab15055/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/6ed091069985/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/bc0203411717/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/1b4fdfe23499/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants.测量人工耳蜗植入术前、术中及术后皮肤厚度的方法。
J Otol. 2022 Apr;17(2):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
Predicting the Magnet Strength Using a Tablet-Based Tool for Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation.使用基于平板电脑的工具预测接受人工耳蜗植入患者的磁体强度
Cureus. 2023 Oct 3;15(10):e46417. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46417. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Skin flap thickness and magnet strength in Cochlear implants.人工耳蜗中皮瓣厚度与磁体强度
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Mar;22(2):80-84. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1824640. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Blinded comparison of computed tomography, ultrasound and needle methods to measure skin flap thickness for cochlear implantation.计算机断层扫描、超声和针探法测量人工耳蜗植入皮瓣厚度的盲法比较。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2023 Nov;24(6):295-300. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2023.2239515. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Triamcinolone Injection for Cochlear Implant Magnet Adherence Issues.曲安奈德注射液治疗人工耳蜗磁铁附着问题。
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Sep 1;44(8):e572-e576. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003974. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
A comparison of imaging techniques to measure skin flap thickness in cochlear implant patients to enable pre-operative device selection.比较影像学技术测量耳蜗植入患者皮瓣厚度,以实现术前设备选择。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2022 Jul;23(4):179-188. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2045074. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
7
External magnet displacement in cochlear implants: causes and management.外置磁铁在人工耳蜗中的移位:原因与处理。
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):88-93. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c2a0c4.
8
Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI.比较各种包扎技术以预防 MRI 后耳蜗植入体磁铁移位。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov;278(11):4209-4216. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06504-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
9
Skin flap thickness in cochlear implant patients - a prospective study.人工耳蜗植入患者皮瓣厚度的前瞻性研究。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2007 Sep;8(3):148-57. doi: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.3.148.
10
Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome.MRI 后耳蜗植入磁铁脱位:手术治疗及结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;277(5):1297-1304. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05826-x. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Triamcinolone Injection for Cochlear Implant Magnet Adherence Issues.曲安奈德注射液治疗人工耳蜗磁铁附着问题。
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Sep 1;44(8):e572-e576. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003974. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Skin flap thickness and magnet strength in Cochlear implants.人工耳蜗中皮瓣厚度与磁体强度
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Mar;22(2):80-84. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1824640. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Cochlear Implantation in Adults.成人人工耳蜗植入
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1531-1542. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1904407.
3
Immediate activation after cochlear implantation: Preliminary Study.立即激活人工耳蜗植入后:初步研究。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020 Jan;137(1):17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
4
Feasibility of early activation after cochlear implantation.人工耳蜗植入后早期激活的可行性。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov;44(6):1004-1010. doi: 10.1111/coa.13427. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
5
Early Fitting in Cochlear Implantation: Benefits and Limits.早期耳蜗植入的适应:益处和限制。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Apr;39(4):e250-e256. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001745.
6
Cochlear implant - state of the art.人工耳蜗——最新技术水平
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 19;16:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/cto000143. eCollection 2017.
7
Temporal Scalp Thickness, Body Mass Index, and Suprafascial Placement of Receiver Coil of the Cochlear Implant.颞部头皮厚度、体重指数与人工耳蜗接收线圈的筋膜上放置
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Nov;28(8):e781-e785. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003999.
8
[Headache and Degraded Speech Recognition in a Patient with Unilateral Cochlear Implant].
Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 Aug;95(8):559-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105763. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.即将出现:人工耳蜗技术。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;48(6):1097-116. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Safety and feasibility of initial frequency mapping within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.人工耳蜗植入术后24小时内进行初始频率图谱绘制的安全性和可行性。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2015 Jun;135(6):592-7. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1006335. Epub 2015 Feb 27.