Suppr超能文献

测量人工耳蜗植入术前、术中及术后皮肤厚度的方法。

Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants.

作者信息

Zaubitzer Lena, Schaefer Elena, Wallhaeuser-Franke Elisabeth, Burkart Johannes, Herrmann Katrin, Walter Beatrice, Schell Angela, Scherl Claudia, Servais Jérôme, Haeussler Daniel

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Otol. 2022 Apr;17(2):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).

METHODS

The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.

RESULTS

Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457-0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.

CONCLUSION

All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定是否存在一种可靠的方法,用于测量人工耳蜗植入术前、术中和术后耳后皮肤的厚度,以便评估人工耳蜗(CI)外部磁体的最佳作用力。

方法

使用三种不同方法测量了83例接受人工耳蜗植入患者的耳后皮肤厚度。在术前和术后CT图像上以及术中测量厚度。记录外科医生在开机时和首次随访期间选择的磁体类别。对不同的皮肤厚度测量值以及皮肤厚度与磁体强度类别之间进行相关性分析。

结果

直到随访时,只有6例患者需要更换磁体。虽然三种测量方法的中位绝对厚度差异显著(p < 0.0001),但其厚度值显示出高度显著的相关性(Pearson相关系数r = 0.457 - 0.585;p < 0.01)。此外,磁体强度与手术前、后及术中测定的皮瓣厚度显著相关。术中针测法与磁体强度的相关性最低。

结论

所有三种测量方法都为确定理想磁力提供了合适的基础。然而,特别值得关注的是术前和术后的CT测量。前者能够早期评估所需的磁体强度,从而及时在术后提供,而后者有助于估计随访期间降低磁体强度的必要性以及早期开机的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09d3/9349019/fe820ab15055/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验