Iosifescu Dan V, Norton Richard J, Tural Umit, Mischoulon David, Collins Katherine, McDonald Erin, De Taboada Luis, Foster Simmie, Cusin Cristina, Yeung Albert, Clain Alisabet, Schoenfeld David, Hamblin Michael R, Cassano Paolo
Clinical Research Division, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York.
Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 8;83(5):21m14226. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m14226.
Transcranial photobiomodulation (t-PBM) with near-infrared (NIR) light might represent a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the dosimetry of administered t-PBM varies widely. We tested the efficacy of t-PBM with low irradiance, low energy per session, and low number of sessions in individuals with MDD. A 2-site, double-blind, sham-controlled study was conducted of adjunct t-PBM NIR (830 nm; continuous wave; 35.8 cm treatment area; 54.8 mW/cm irradiance; 65.8 J/cm fluence, 20 min/session; ~2 W total power; 2.3 kJ total energy per session), delivered to the prefrontal cortex, bilaterally, twice a week for 6 weeks, in subjects diagnosed with MDD per the criteria. Subjects were recruited between August 2016 and May 2018. A sequential parallel comparison design was used: 18 nonresponders to sham in phase 1 (6 weeks) were re-randomized in phase 2. The primary outcome was reduction in depression severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS-17] and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rating [QIDS-C] scores) from baseline. Statistical analyses used R package SPCDAnalyze2, including all subjects with ≥ 1 post-randomization evaluation. Of the 54 subjects recruited, we included 49 MDD subjects in the analysis (71% female, mean ± SD age 40.8 ± 16.1 years). There were no significant differences between t-PBM and sham with respect to the change in HDRS-17 ( = -0.319, = .751) or QIDS-C ( = -0.499, = .620) scores. The sham effect was reasonably low. Mostly uncontrolled studies suggest the efficacy of t-PBM for MDD; however, its optimal dose is still to be defined. A minimal dose threshold is likely necessary, similarly to other neuromodulation techniques in MDD (electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation). We established a threshold of inefficacy of t-PBM for MDD, based on combined low irradiance, low energy per session, and low number of sessions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02959307.
近红外(NIR)光经颅光生物调节(t-PBM)可能是治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的一种方法。然而,所给予的t-PBM剂量测定差异很大。我们测试了低辐照度、低每次治疗能量和低治疗次数的t-PBM对MDD患者的疗效。对辅助性t-PBM近红外光(830纳米;连续波;35.8平方厘米治疗面积;54.8毫瓦/平方厘米辐照度;65.8焦/平方厘米通量,每次治疗20分钟;约2瓦总功率;每次治疗2.3千焦总能量)进行了一项双部位、双盲、假对照研究,该光双侧照射前额叶皮质,每周两次,共6周,研究对象为根据标准诊断为MDD的受试者。研究对象于2016年8月至2018年5月招募。采用序贯平行比较设计:第1阶段(6周)对18名假治疗无反应者在第2阶段重新随机分组。主要结局是抑郁严重程度(汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表[HDRS-17]和抑郁症状快速检查表-临床医生评定[QIDS-C]评分)相对于基线的降低。统计分析使用R包SPCDAnalyze2,纳入所有随机分组后≥1次评估的受试者。在招募的54名受试者中,我们将49名MDD受试者纳入分析(71%为女性,平均±标准差年龄40.8±16.1岁)。在HDRS-17(t=-0.319,P=.751)或QIDS-C(t=-0.499,P=.620)评分变化方面,t-PBM与假治疗之间无显著差异。假治疗效应相当低。大多数非对照研究表明t-PBM对MDD有效;然而,其最佳剂量仍有待确定。与MDD中的其他神经调节技术(电休克治疗、经颅磁刺激)类似,可能需要一个最小剂量阈值。我们基于低辐照度、低每次治疗能量和低治疗次数的组合,确定了t-PBM对MDD无效的阈值。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02959307。