• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DQAgui:MIRACUM 数据质量评估工具的图形用户界面。

DQAgui: a graphical user interface for the MIRACUM data quality assessment tool.

机构信息

Medical Center for Information and Communication Technology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01961-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01961-z
PMID:35953813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367129/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the growing impact of observational research studies, there is also a growing focus on data quality (DQ). As opposed to experimental study designs, observational research studies are performed using data mostly collected in a non-research context (secondary use). Depending on the number of data elements to be analyzed, DQ reports of data stored within research networks can grow very large. They might be cumbersome to read and important information could be overseen quickly. To address this issue, a DQ assessment (DQA) tool with a graphical user interface (GUI) was developed and provided as a web application.

METHODS

The aim was to provide an easy-to-use interface for users without prior programming knowledge to carry out DQ checks and to present the results in a clearly structured way. This interface serves as a starting point for a more detailed investigation of possible DQ irregularities. A user-centered development process ensured the practical feasibility of the interactive GUI. The interface was implemented in the R programming language and aligned to Kahn et al.'s DQ categories conformance, completeness and plausibility.

RESULTS

With DQAgui, an R package with a web-app frontend for DQ assessment was developed. The GUI allows users to perform DQ analyses of tabular data sets and to systematically evaluate the results. During the development of the GUI, additional features were implemented, such as analyzing a subset of the data by defining time periods and restricting the analyses to certain data elements.

CONCLUSIONS

As part of the MIRACUM project, DQAgui is now being used at ten German university hospitals for DQ assessment and to provide a central overview of the availability of important data elements in a datamap over 2 years. Future development efforts should focus on design optimization and include a usability evaluation.

摘要

背景

随着观察性研究的影响不断增加,人们也越来越关注数据质量(DQ)。与实验研究设计不同,观察性研究使用的是主要在非研究环境中收集的数据(二次使用)。根据要分析的数据元素的数量,存储在研究网络中的数据的 DQ 报告可能会变得非常大。它们可能难以阅读,重要信息可能会被迅速忽略。为了解决这个问题,开发了一个带有图形用户界面(GUI)的 DQ 评估(DQA)工具,并将其作为网络应用程序提供。

方法

目的是为没有编程知识的用户提供一个易于使用的界面,以便进行 DQ 检查,并以清晰结构化的方式呈现结果。该界面是对可能存在的 DQ 异常情况进行更详细调查的起点。用户为中心的开发过程确保了交互 GUI 的实际可行性。该界面是用 R 编程语言实现的,并与 Kahn 等人的 DQ 类别一致性、完整性和合理性保持一致。

结果

通过 DQAgui,开发了一个带有 R 程序包和前端网络应用程序的 DQ 评估工具。该 GUI 允许用户对表格数据集进行 DQ 分析,并对结果进行系统评估。在开发 GUI 期间,实现了其他功能,例如通过定义时间段分析数据的子集,并将分析限制在某些数据元素。

结论

作为 MIRACUM 项目的一部分,DQAgui 目前正在德国的十所大学医院用于 DQ 评估,并提供了在两年多时间内数据图中重要数据元素可用性的集中概览。未来的开发工作应侧重于设计优化,并包括可用性评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/01b6da0fe2ef/12911_2022_1961_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/0a5f4536adcd/12911_2022_1961_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/2a4dedeb06cc/12911_2022_1961_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/453282198da0/12911_2022_1961_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/cd6478ad3a44/12911_2022_1961_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/01b6da0fe2ef/12911_2022_1961_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/0a5f4536adcd/12911_2022_1961_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/2a4dedeb06cc/12911_2022_1961_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/453282198da0/12911_2022_1961_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/cd6478ad3a44/12911_2022_1961_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a95/9367129/01b6da0fe2ef/12911_2022_1961_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
DQAgui: a graphical user interface for the MIRACUM data quality assessment tool.DQAgui:MIRACUM 数据质量评估工具的图形用户界面。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01961-z.
2
Linking a Consortium-Wide Data Quality Assessment Tool with the MIRACUM Metadata Repository.将联盟范围内的数据质量评估工具与 MIRACUM 元数据存储库相链接。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):826-835. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733847. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Moving Towards an EHR Data Quality Framework: The MIRACUM Approach.迈向电子健康记录数据质量框架:MIRACUM方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:247-253. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190834.
4
A Comparison of Data Quality Assessment Checks in Six Data Sharing Networks.六个数据共享网络中数据质量评估检查的比较
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Jun 12;5(1):8. doi: 10.5334/egems.223.
5
The relationship between electronic health records user interface features and data quality of patient clinical information: an integrative review.电子健康记录用户界面特征与患者临床信息数据质量之间的关系:综合述评。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):240-255. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad188.
6
Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience.启动全院范围的数据质量计划。AP-HP 的经验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Nov;181:104804. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Evaluation of Three Feasibility Tools for Identifying Patient Data and Biospecimen Availability: Comparative Usability Study.评估三种用于识别患者数据和生物样本可用性的可行性工具:比较可用性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 21;9(7):e25531. doi: 10.2196/25531.
8
Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment.自动化电子健康记录数据质量评估。
J Med Syst. 2023 Feb 13;47(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2.
9
Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data.在真实世界数据时代,通过系统的范围综述评估国家临床数据研究网络中的数据质量评估实践。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):1999-2010. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa245.
10
A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.电子健康记录数据二次使用的统一数据质量评估术语和框架。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Sep 11;4(1):1244. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.
2
Electronic Health Record Data Quality and Performance Assessments: Scoping Review.电子健康记录数据质量和性能评估:范围综述。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 6;12:e58130. doi: 10.2196/58130.
3
Uncovering Harmonization Potential in Health Care Data Through Iterative Refinement of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources Profiles Based on Retrospective Discrepancy Analysis: Case Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying primary care datasets and perspectives on their secondary use: a survey of Australian data users and custodians.识别初级保健数据集及其二次利用的观点:对澳大利亚数据用户和保管人的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01830-9.
2
Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment.评估全科医疗电子健康记录在临床预测模型开发中的适用性:数据质量评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01669-6.
3
In the Pursuit of Privacy: The Promises and Predicaments of Federated Learning in Healthcare.
基于回顾性差异分析,通过快速医疗保健互操作性资源概况的迭代优化来挖掘医疗保健数据中的协调潜力:案例研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jul 23;12:e57005. doi: 10.2196/57005.
4
Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.电子健康记录数据质量评估及工具:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1730-1740. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad120.
追求隐私:医疗保健领域联邦学习的前景与困境
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Oct 6;4:746497. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.746497. eCollection 2021.
4
A statistical quality assessment method for longitudinal observations in electronic health record data with an application to the VA million veteran program.电子健康记录数据中纵向观测的统计质量评估方法及其在 VA 百万老兵计划中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01643-2.
5
Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative.集中式和联邦式数据质量管理方法的协同作用:来自国家 COVID 队列协作的报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):609-618. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab217.
6
Linking a Consortium-Wide Data Quality Assessment Tool with the MIRACUM Metadata Repository.将联盟范围内的数据质量评估工具与 MIRACUM 元数据存储库相链接。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):826-835. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733847. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
Increasing trust in real-world evidence through evaluation of observational data quality.通过评估观察性数据质量来增加对真实世界证据的信任。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2251-2257. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab132.
8
Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R.促进数据质量评估的协调一致。具有 R 软件实现的观察性健康研究数据收集的数据质量框架。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 2;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01252-7.
9
Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: A literature review.贯穿数据生命周期的真实世界数据存储库质量评估:文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1591-1599. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa340.
10
Big hopes for big data.对大数据寄予厚望。
Nat Med. 2020 Jan;26(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0740-8.