Spraul M, Sonnenberg G E, Berger M
Diabetes Care. 1987 May-Jun;10(3):357-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.3.357.
We examined the reliability of split test strips for blood glucose self-monitoring. One hundred visual readings were performed with each of the following test strips: original Haemoglukotest 20-800 (HGT 1/1; Boehringer-Mannheim, Mannheim, FRG) and Haemoglukotest 20-800 halved either by a splitting device (HGT 1/2 SP) or by a pair of scissors (HGT 1/2 SC). Within the plasma glucose range of 20-360 mg/dl, there was a close correlation between the results of all three test-strip readings and the values obtained by the reference method (Beckman glucose analyzer): HGT 1/1, r = .950; HGT 1/2 SP, r = .966; and HGT 1/2 SC, r = .966. Absolute deviations from the reference values were 17 +/- 2, 17 +/- 1, and 17 +/- 1 mg/dl (mean +/- SE). Analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences between the values of each of the three procedures compared with the reference method (P = .98). These results indicate that visual reading of split test strips is as reliable as the reading of original test strips. A special splitting device is not necessary. Diabetic patients should be advised to use split test strips for blood glucose self-monitoring to reduce costs.
我们检测了用于血糖自我监测的分割试纸条的可靠性。使用以下每种试纸条进行了100次目视读数:原装的Haemoglukotest 20 - 800(HGT 1/1;德国曼海姆的勃林格殷格翰公司)以及通过分割装置(HGT 1/2 SP)或剪刀(HGT 1/2 SC)将Haemoglukotest 20 - 800对半剪开得到的试纸条。在20 - 360 mg/dl的血浆葡萄糖范围内,所有三种试纸条读数的结果与通过参考方法(贝克曼血糖仪)获得的值之间存在密切相关性:HGT 1/1,r = 0.950;HGT 1/2 SP,r = 0.966;HGT 1/2 SC,r = 0.966。与参考值的绝对偏差分别为17±2、17±1和17±1 mg/dl(平均值±标准误)。方差分析未显示三种方法中的任何一种与参考方法相比的值有任何显著差异(P = 0.98)。这些结果表明,分割试纸条的目视读数与原装试纸条的读数一样可靠。不需要特殊的分割装置。应建议糖尿病患者使用分割试纸条进行血糖自我监测以降低成本。