MRC Epidemiology Unit & Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), University of Cambridge, Box 285, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 6;16(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0846-x.
Evidence suggests eating home-prepared food (HPF) is associated with increased dietary quality, while dietary quality varies across socio-demographic factors. Although it has been hypothesised that variation in HPF consumption between population sub-groups may contribute to variation in dietary quality, evidence is inconclusive. This study takes a novel approach to quantifying home-prepared food (HPF) consumption, and describes HPF consumption in a population-representative sample, determining variation between socio-demographic groups. It tests the association between HPF consumption and dietary quality, determining whether socio-demographic characteristics moderate this association.
Cross-sectional analysis of UK survey data (N = 6364, aged≥19; collected 2008-16, analysed 2018). High dietary quality was defined as 'DASH accordance': the quintile most accordant with the Dietary Approaches to Stopping Hypertension (DASH) diet. HPF consumption was estimated from 4-day food diaries. Linear regressions were used to determine the association between HPF consumption and socio-demographic variables (household income, education, occupation, age, gender, ethnicity and children in the household). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between HPF consumption and DASH accordance. Interaction terms were introduced, testing for moderation of the association between HPF consumption and DASH accordance by socio-demographic variables.
HPF consumption was relatively low across the sample (Mean (SD) % of energy consumption = 26.5%(12.1%)), and lower among white participants (25.9% v 37.8 and 34.4% for black and Asian participants respectively, p < 0.01). It did not vary substantially by age, gender, education, income or occupation. Higher consumption of HPF was associated with greater odds of being in the most DASH accordant quintile (OR = 1.2 per 10% increase in % energy from HPF, 95% CI 1.1-1.3). Ethnicity was the only significant moderator of the association between HPF consumption and DASH accordance, but this should be interpreted with caution due to high proportion of white participants.
While an association exists between HPF consumption and higher dietary quality, consumption of HPF or HPF's association with dietary quality does not vary substantially between socio-demographic groups. While HPF may be a part of the puzzle, it appears other factors drive socio-demographic variation in dietary quality.
有证据表明,食用家庭自制食品(HPF)与提高饮食质量有关,而饮食质量因社会人口因素的不同而有所差异。尽管有人假设,人群亚组之间 HPF 消费的差异可能导致饮食质量的差异,但目前证据尚无定论。本研究采用一种新颖的方法来量化家庭自制食品(HPF)的消费,并描述了在具有代表性的人群样本中 HPF 的消费情况,确定了社会人口群体之间的差异。它测试了 HPF 消费与饮食质量之间的关联,确定社会人口特征是否调节了这种关联。
对英国调查数据(N=6364 人,年龄≥19 岁;收集于 2008-2016 年,分析于 2018 年)进行横断面分析。高饮食质量定义为“DASH 一致性”:与饮食方法防治高血压(DASH)饮食最一致的五分位数。HPF 消费是根据 4 天的食物日记来估计的。线性回归用于确定 HPF 消费与社会人口变量(家庭收入、教育、职业、年龄、性别、族裔和家庭中的儿童)之间的关联。逻辑回归用于确定 HPF 消费与 DASH 一致性之间的关联。引入交互项,测试 HPF 消费与 DASH 一致性之间的关联是否受社会人口变量的调节。
整个样本中 HPF 的消费相对较低(平均(SD)%能量消耗=26.5%(12.1%)),白种参与者的消费更低(25.9%,而黑人和亚洲参与者分别为 37.8%和 34.4%,p<0.01)。它与年龄、性别、教育、收入或职业没有明显差异。HPF 消费越高,处于 DASH 一致性最高五分位数的可能性就越大(OR=1.2,每增加 10%的 HPF 能量,95%CI 为 1.1-1.3)。族裔是 HPF 消费与 DASH 一致性之间关联的唯一显著调节因素,但由于白种参与者比例较高,因此对此应谨慎解释。
虽然 HPF 消费与更高的饮食质量之间存在关联,但 HPF 的消费或其与饮食质量的关联在社会人口群体之间没有明显差异。虽然 HPF 可能是问题的一部分,但似乎其他因素导致了饮食质量在社会人口方面的差异。