Dimitrova Mariya, Chuchulska Bozhana, Zlatev Stefan, Kazakova Rada
Department of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
CAD/CAM Center of Dental Medicine, Research Institute, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;14(15):3125. doi: 10.3390/polym14153125.
This study investigated the colour stability of three dimensional (3D)-printed and conventional denture teeth after immersion in different colourants. A total of 60 artificial maxillary central incisors were selected from three types of materials: 3D-printed dental resin (NextDent, 3D Systems, Soesterberg, The Netherlands), prefabricated acrylic teeth in Ivostar Shade (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and SpofaDent Plus in shade A2 (SpofaDental, Jičín, Czechia). These were immersed in four types of colourants at room temperature (23 °C ± 1 °C), including artificial saliva (pH = 6.8) as a control group, coffee, red wine, and Coca-Cola ( = 5). The temperature and the pH of the colouring agents were maintained throughout all immersion periods. After 7 days (T1), 14 days (T2), and 21 days (T3), the ∆E values were measured with a SpectroShade Micro (SpectroShade, Oxnard, CA, USA) spectrophotometer. Their means were then calculated and compared by two-way ANOVA. The independent factors, immersion time and different staining solutions, as well as the interaction between these factors, significantly influenced ΔE. The highest and the lowest mean ∆Es were recorded for prefabricated teeth in red wine, and 3D-printed teeth in artificial saliva, respectively. All the specimens demonstrated an increased colour change at T1 compared to T3, and the difference in mean ∆E was statistically significant.
本研究调查了三维(3D)打印假牙和传统假牙牙齿在浸入不同着色剂后的颜色稳定性。从三种材料中总共选取了60颗人工上颌中切牙:3D打印牙科树脂(NextDent,3D Systems,荷兰索斯特贝亨)、Ivostar色号的预制丙烯酸牙(义获嘉伟瓦登特,列支敦士登沙恩)和A2色号的SpofaDent Plus(斯波法牙科,捷克伊钦)。将这些牙齿在室温(23°C±1°C)下浸入四种着色剂中,包括作为对照组的人工唾液(pH = 6.8)、咖啡、红酒和可口可乐( = 5)。在所有浸泡期间,着色剂的温度和pH值保持不变。在7天(T1)、14天(T2)和21天(T3)后,使用SpectroShade Micro(SpectroShade,美国加利福尼亚州奥克斯纳德)分光光度计测量ΔE值。然后计算其平均值,并通过双向方差分析进行比较。独立因素、浸泡时间和不同的染色溶液,以及这些因素之间的相互作用,对ΔE有显著影响。红酒中的预制牙和人工唾液中的3D打印牙分别记录到最高和最低的平均ΔE值。与T3相比,所有标本在T1时均显示颜色变化增加,平均ΔE的差异具有统计学意义。