Zelmer Anja R, Nelson Renjy, Richter Katharina, Atkins Gerald J
Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Bone Res. 2022 Aug 12;10(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00227-8.
Approximately 40% of treatments of chronic and recurrent osteomyelitis fail in part due to bacterial persistence. Staphylococcus aureus, the predominant pathogen in human osteomyelitis, is known to persist by phenotypic adaptation as small-colony variants (SCVs) and by formation of intracellular reservoirs, including those in major bone cell types, reducing susceptibility to antibiotics. Intracellular infections with S. aureus are difficult to treat; however, there are no evidence-based clinical guidelines addressing these infections in osteomyelitis. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the demonstrated efficacy of all antibiotics against intracellular S. aureus relevant to osteomyelitis, including protein biosynthesis inhibitors (lincosamides, streptogramins, macrolides, oxazolidines, tetracyclines, fusidic acid, and aminoglycosides), enzyme inhibitors (fluoroquinolones and ansamycines), and cell wall inhibitors (beta-lactam inhibitors, glycopeptides, fosfomycin, and lipopeptides). The PubMed and Embase databases were screened for articles related to intracellular S. aureus infections that compared the effectiveness of multiple antibiotics or a single antibiotic together with another treatment, which resulted in 34 full-text articles fitting the inclusion criteria. The combined findings of these studies were largely inconclusive, most likely due to the plethora of methodologies utilized. Therefore, the reported findings in the context of the models employed and possible solutions for improved understanding are explored here. While rifampicin, oritavancin, linezolid, moxifloxacin and oxacillin were identified as the most effective potential intracellular treatments, the scientific evidence for these is still relatively weak. We advocate for more standardized research on determining the intracellular effectiveness of antibiotics in S. aureus osteomyelitis to improve treatments and patient outcomes.
大约40%的慢性和复发性骨髓炎治疗失败,部分原因是细菌持续存在。金黄色葡萄球菌是人类骨髓炎的主要病原体,已知它可通过表型适应形成小菌落变体(SCV)以及形成细胞内储存库(包括在主要骨细胞类型中的储存库)来持续存在,从而降低对抗生素的敏感性。金黄色葡萄球菌的细胞内感染难以治疗;然而,目前尚无基于证据的临床指南来处理骨髓炎中的这些感染。我们对文献进行了系统综述,以确定所有抗生素对与骨髓炎相关的细胞内金黄色葡萄球菌的已证实疗效,包括蛋白质生物合成抑制剂(林可酰胺类、链阳菌素类、大环内酯类、恶唑烷类、四环素类、夫西地酸和氨基糖苷类)、酶抑制剂(氟喹诺酮类和安莎霉素类)以及细胞壁抑制剂(β-内酰胺类抑制剂、糖肽类、磷霉素和脂肽类)。在PubMed和Embase数据库中筛选与细胞内金黄色葡萄球菌感染相关的文章,这些文章比较了多种抗生素或单一抗生素与其他治疗方法的有效性,结果有34篇全文文章符合纳入标准。这些研究的综合结果在很大程度上尚无定论,很可能是由于所采用的方法过多。因此,本文将在所采用的模型背景下探讨已报道的研究结果以及为增进理解而可能采取的解决方案。虽然利福平、奥利万星、利奈唑胺、莫西沙星和苯唑西林被确定为最有效的潜在细胞内治疗药物,但这些药物的科学证据仍然相对薄弱。我们主张开展更标准化的研究,以确定抗生素在金黄色葡萄球菌骨髓炎中的细胞内有效性,从而改善治疗效果和患者预后。