Suppr超能文献

比较年轻成年人和老年成年人自传体记忆检索过程中的神经活动:一项 ALE 荟萃分析。

Comparing neural activity during autobiographical memory retrieval between younger and older adults: An ALE meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Neurobiol Aging. 2022 Nov;119:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

Aging changes autobiographical memory (AM), yet the neural correlates of these changes are poorly understood, likely due to methodological variability across studies. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation (GingerALE 3.0.2) to identify regions AM retrieval engaged in younger and older adults across 45 studies (N = 24 studies, 357 participants, 349 foci; N = 21 studies, 299 participants, 356 foci), considering methodological differences in cueing AMs (i.e., using generic vs. specific/personalized cues). Both age-groups commonly engaged a left-lateralized pattern of brain activity that included the hippocampus, retrosplenial/posterior cingulate cortex, and angular gyrus. Younger adults showed enhanced right posterior cingulate cortical activity, while older adults presented with bilateral activity in the hippocampus, and enhanced activity in left middle temporal gyrus, precuneus, and retrosplenial cortex. Exploratory analyses indicated that age-related commonalties and differences in brain activity depended on the method of AM cuing. These findings suggest that key regions of AM retrieval are preserved in older age, yet subtle changes exist, especially depending on how AMs are cued.

摘要

衰老改变自传体记忆(AM),但这些变化的神经相关性尚不清楚,这可能是由于研究之间的方法学变异性。我们使用激活似然估计(GingerALE 3.0.2)进行了一项定量荟萃分析,以确定在 45 项研究(N=24 项研究,357 名参与者,349 个焦点;N=21 项研究,299 名参与者,356 个焦点)中,年轻和年长成年人在回忆 AM 时所涉及的区域,同时考虑到提示 AM 的方法学差异(即,使用通用提示与特定/个性化提示)。两个年龄组通常都表现出一种左偏侧化的大脑活动模式,包括海马体、后扣带回/后顶叶皮层和角回。年轻成年人表现出右后扣带回皮层活动增强,而年长成年人则表现出海马体双侧活动增强,左颞中回、楔前叶和后扣带回皮层活动增强。探索性分析表明,大脑活动的年龄相关性相似性和差异取决于 AM 提示的方法。这些发现表明,关键的 AM 检索区域在老年时得到保留,但存在细微的变化,尤其是取决于如何提示 AM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验