• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术患者术前准备评估工具中文版的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the preoperative assessment of readiness tool among surgical patients.

作者信息

Bao Guanjun, Liu Yuanfei, Zhang Wei, Yang Yile, Yao MeiQi, Zhu Lin, Jin Jingfen

机构信息

Quzhou College of Technology, Quzhou, China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU), Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:916554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916554. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916554
PMID:35967678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9366670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the surgical readiness of patients plays an important role in clinical care. Preoperative readiness assessment is needed to identify the inadequacy among surgical patients, which provides guide for interventions to improve patients' preoperative readiness. However, there is a paucity of high-level, quality tool that evaluate surgical readiness of patients in China. The purpose of this study is to translate the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool (PART) into Chinese and determine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version in the population of surgical patients.

METHODS

Using a standard translation-backward method, the original English version of PART was translated into Chinese. A convenient sampling of 210 surgical patients was recruited from 6 hospitals in Zhejiang Province to test the psychometric properties of this scale including internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity, structure validity, and floor/ceiling effect.

RESULTS

A total of 194 patients (92%) completed questionnaires. The Chinese version of PART achieved Cronbach's alphas 0.948 and McDonald's omega coefficient 0.947, respectively, for the full scale. The estimated odd-even split-half reliability was 0.959. The scale-level content validity index was 0.867, and the items content validity index ranged from 0.83 to 1.0.The output of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed a two-factor model (χ = 510.96; df = 86; < 0.001; root mean square error approximation = 0.08) with no floor/ceiling effect.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of PART demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity among surgical patients. It can be used to evaluate patients' preoperative preparation and help health professionals provide proper preoperative support.

摘要

背景

患者手术准备情况的评估在临床护理中起着重要作用。需要进行术前准备评估以识别手术患者存在的不足之处,为改善患者术前准备的干预措施提供指导。然而,在中国,缺乏评估患者手术准备情况的高水平、高质量工具。本研究的目的是将术前准备评估工具(PART)翻译成中文,并确定中文版在手术患者群体中的信效度。

方法

采用标准的翻译-回译方法,将PART的英文原版翻译成中文。从浙江省6家医院方便抽样招募210例手术患者,以测试该量表的心理测量学特性,包括内部一致性、分半信度、内容效度、结构效度以及地板效应/天花板效应。

结果

共有194例患者(92%)完成问卷。PART中文版全量表的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.948,McDonald's ω系数为0.947。估计的奇偶分半信度为0.959。量表水平的内容效度指数为0.867,各条目内容效度指数范围为0.83至1.0。验证性因子分析(CFA)结果显示为二因子模型(χ = 510.96;df = 86;< 0.001;近似均方根误差 = 0.08),无地板效应/天花板效应。

结论

PART中文版在手术患者中显示出可接受的信效度。它可用于评估患者的术前准备情况,并帮助医护人员提供适当的术前支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b1/9366670/8b483a827e00/fpsyg-13-916554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b1/9366670/8b483a827e00/fpsyg-13-916554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b1/9366670/8b483a827e00/fpsyg-13-916554-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the preoperative assessment of readiness tool among surgical patients.手术患者术前准备评估工具中文版的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:916554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916554. eCollection 2022.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the postpartum depression literacy scale.产后抑郁知识量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:966770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966770. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Positive Health Behaviours Scale for clinical nurses: a cross-sectional translation.临床护士积极健康行为量表中文版的心理测量学评价:横断面翻译
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 31;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01453-z.
4
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Revised Colorectal Cancer Perception and Screening Instrument among First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China.中国结直肠癌患者一级亲属中修订版结直肠癌认知与筛查工具的翻译、改编及验证
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Mar 30;7(2):180-189. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_6_20. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
5
Psychometric properties of the ethical conflict in nursing questionnaire critical care version among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional study.中文版护士伦理冲突问卷重症监护版在中国护士中的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 28;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00651-x.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Psychometric properties assessment of Chinese version of work readiness scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) and associated factors of work readiness: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版护士工作准备度量表(WRS-GN)的心理计量学特性评估及其工作准备度的相关因素:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes Toward Recognizing Early and Noticeable Deterioration scale.《对早期明显恶化的认知态度量表》中文版的跨文化调适与效度验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1062949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062949. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the fathers' fear of childbirth scale: A cross-sectional study.中文版父亲分娩恐惧量表的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 3;14:1128971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128971. eCollection 2023.
10
A Chinese version of the Stroke Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised: Reliability and validity assessment in stroke patients.中文版的《中风疾病感知问卷修订版》:中风患者的信度和效度评估。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Dec;30(6):e13278. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13278. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistics From A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): A Guide to Interpreting Common Measures of Association, Agreement, Diagnostic Accuracy, Effect Size, Heterogeneity, and Reliability in Medical Research.从A(一致性)到Z(Z分数)的统计学:医学研究中关联、一致性、诊断准确性、效应量、异质性和可靠性常用指标解读指南。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Dec 1;133(6):1633-1641. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005773.
2
Preferences for Preoperative Education: A Qualitative Study of the Patient Perspective.患者对术前教育的偏好:定性研究视角。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Oct 1;27(10):633-636. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001014.
3
Development and Validation of the MiPrep Survey: An Instrument Assessing Patients' Perceived Preparation for Medical Interventions Including Medical Imaging, Radiotherapy, and Surgery.
MiPrep 调查的制定与验证:一种评估患者对医疗干预(包括医学影像、放射治疗和手术)准备程度的工具。
Value Health. 2019 Jun;22(6):704-711. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Metabolic and the Surgical Stress Response Considerations to Improve Postoperative Recovery.代谢与手术应激反应的考虑因素以改善术后恢复。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Apr 11;23(5):33. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0770-4.
5
Scale Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool.
J Perianesth Nurs. 2018 Dec;33(6):895-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.07.010.
6
Nurse Spiritual Therapeutics Scale: Psychometric evaluation among cancer patients.护士精神治疗量表:癌症患者的心理测量评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):939-946. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14711. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
8
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
9
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Patient Preparation for Transitions of Surgical Care: Is Failing to Prepare Surgical Patients Preparing Them to Fail?手术护理过渡中的患者准备:未对手术患者进行准备是否等同于让他们准备失败?
World J Surg. 2017 Jun;41(6):1447-1453. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3884-z.