• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拥抱与日常情绪及总体生活满意度的关联:一项生态瞬时评估研究

The Association of Embracing with Daily Mood and General Life Satisfaction: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

作者信息

Packheiser Julian, Malek Imke Marlene, Reichart Jacqueline Sophia, Katona Laura, Luhmann Maike, Ocklenburg Sebastian

机构信息

Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Nonverbal Behav. 2022;46(4):519-536. doi: 10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8
PMID:35967989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9362016/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Embracing has several positive health effects, such as lowering blood pressure and decreasing infection risk. However, its association with general life satisfaction and daily mood has not been researched in detail. Here, we used a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) approach to monitor the daily number of embraces and daily mood in a sample of 94 adults over the course of seven days. We found that embracing frequency differed slightly over the week, with embracing occurring more frequently on weekends than on weekdays. We also found that higher daily embracing frequencies were associated with better daily mood using multilevel modeling. Only singles benefitted from increases in average embracing regarding their life satisfaction, whereas individuals in a relationship were unaffected by their embracing tendencies. Although our results are strictly correlational and do not indicate any direction or causality, embraces may be important for daily mood and general life satisfaction, but their efficacy seems to depend on relationship status.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8.

摘要

未标注

拥抱有多种积极的健康影响,比如降低血压和减少感染风险。然而,其与总体生活满意度和日常情绪的关联尚未得到详细研究。在此,我们采用基于智能手机的生态瞬时评估(EMA)方法,在7天时间里监测了94名成年人样本中的每日拥抱次数和日常情绪。我们发现,一周内拥抱频率略有差异,周末的拥抱频率比工作日更高。我们还通过多水平建模发现,更高的每日拥抱频率与更好的日常情绪相关。只有单身人士在平均拥抱次数增加时,其生活满意度有所提升,而处于恋爱关系中的人则不受其拥抱倾向的影响。尽管我们的结果严格来说只是相关性的,并未表明任何方向或因果关系,但拥抱可能对日常情绪和总体生活满意度很重要,但其效果似乎取决于恋爱状况。

补充信息

网络版包含可在10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/d4990cbcb612/10919_2022_411_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/cf15426a3e44/10919_2022_411_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/c578a64a6472/10919_2022_411_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/abc88e778586/10919_2022_411_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/d4990cbcb612/10919_2022_411_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/cf15426a3e44/10919_2022_411_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/c578a64a6472/10919_2022_411_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/abc88e778586/10919_2022_411_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76cb/9362016/d4990cbcb612/10919_2022_411_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Association of Embracing with Daily Mood and General Life Satisfaction: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.拥抱与日常情绪及总体生活满意度的关联:一项生态瞬时评估研究
J Nonverbal Behav. 2022;46(4):519-536. doi: 10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Social Interactions: Associations With Depression, Anxiety, Pain, and Fatigue in Individuals With Mild Stroke.社会互动的生态瞬时评估:与轻度中风个体的抑郁、焦虑、疼痛和疲劳的关联。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar;102(3):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
3
A Comparison of Hugging Frequency and Its Association with Momentary Mood Before and During COVID-19 Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.使用生态瞬时评估比较拥抱频率及其在 COVID-19 前后与瞬间情绪的关联。
Health Commun. 2024 May;39(5):951-959. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2198058. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Possible Application of Ecological Momentary Assessment to Older Adults' Daily Depressive Mood: Integrative Literature Review.生态瞬时评估在老年人日常抑郁情绪中的可能应用:综合文献综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 2;7(6):e13247. doi: 10.2196/13247.
5
A pilot study on ecological momentary assessment in asylum-seeking children and adolescents resettled to Germany: Investigating compliance, post-migration factors, and the relation between daily mood, sleep patterns, and mental health.一项关于在德国重新安置的寻求庇护的儿童和青少年进行生态瞬时评估的初步研究:调查依从性、移民后因素以及日常情绪、睡眠模式和心理健康之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 1;16(2):e0246069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246069. eCollection 2021.
6
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Adolescent Problems, Coping Efficacy, and Mood States Using a Mobile Phone App: An Exploratory Study.使用手机应用程序对青少年问题、应对效能和情绪状态进行生态瞬时评估:一项探索性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Nov 29;3(4):e51. doi: 10.2196/mental.6361.
7
Smartphone-Delivered Ecological Momentary Interventions Based on Ecological Momentary Assessments to Promote Health Behaviors: Systematic Review and Adapted Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention Studies.基于生态瞬时评估的智能手机推送的生态瞬时干预措施,以促进健康行为:系统评价和报告生态瞬时评估和干预研究的适应性清单。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 19;9(11):e22890. doi: 10.2196/22890.
8
Co-variation of depressive mood and locomotor dynamics evaluated by ecological momentary assessment in healthy humans.通过生态瞬时评估对健康人群抑郁情绪与运动动力学的共变关系进行评估。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 13;8(9):e74979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074979. eCollection 2013.
9
Examining the Theoretical Framework of Behavioral Activation for Major Depressive Disorder: Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.审视重度抑郁症行为激活的理论框架:基于智能手机的生态瞬时评估研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 6;8(12):e32007. doi: 10.2196/32007.
10
A Smartphone-Delivered Ecological Momentary Intervention for Problem Gambling (GamblingLess: Curb Your Urge): Single-Arm Acceptability and Feasibility Trial.一款用于问题赌博(GamblingLess:遏制冲动)的智能手机即时干预应用:单臂可接受性和可行性试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 26;23(3):e25786. doi: 10.2196/25786.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural responses to social touch with different emotional valences: an fNIRS study.对具有不同情感效价的社交触摸的神经反应:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jan 18;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf066.
2
A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions.触摸干预对身心健康影响的系统评价和多变量荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1088-1107. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01841-8. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
An investigation of simulated and real touch on feelings of loneliness.

本文引用的文献

1
Romantic partner embraces reduce cortisol release after acute stress induction in women but not in men.浪漫伴侣的拥抱可减少女性在急性应激诱导后的皮质醇释放,但对男性则不然。
PLoS One. 2022 May 18;17(5):e0266887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266887. eCollection 2022.
2
The influence of duration, arm crossing style, gender, and emotional closeness on hugging behaviour.拥抱行为的持续时间、手臂交叉方式、性别和情感亲密程度的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103441. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103441. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Social touch deprivation during COVID-19: effects on psychological wellbeing and craving interpersonal touch.
模拟触摸和真实触摸对孤独感的影响研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 30;13(1):10587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37467-5.
4
Assessing individual differences in attitudes towards touch in treatment settings: Introducing the touch & health scale.评估治疗环境中对触摸态度的个体差异:引入触摸与健康量表。
Health Psychol Open. 2022 Nov 14;9(2):20551029221137008. doi: 10.1177/20551029221137008. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
5
Changes in Touch Avoidance, Stress, and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.意大利新冠疫情期间触觉回避、压力和焦虑的变化
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:854110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854110. eCollection 2022.
新冠疫情期间社交接触匮乏:对心理健康及人际接触渴望的影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 8;8(9):210287. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210287. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Investigating real-life emotions in romantic couples: a mobile EEG study.在浪漫伴侣中研究真实的情绪:一项移动 EEG 研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80590-w.
5
Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study.英国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的孤独感:COVID-19 心理幸福感研究的横断面结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239698. eCollection 2020.
6
Physical Contact and Loneliness: Being Touched Reduces Perceptions of Loneliness.身体接触与孤独感:被触摸可减轻孤独感。
Adapt Human Behav Physiol. 2020;6(3):292-306. doi: 10.1007/s40750-020-00138-0. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Psychological resilience during the COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间的心理韧性
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113216. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113216. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis.人格对心理和主观幸福感的预测:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):279-323. doi: 10.1037/bul0000226. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
Asymmetries in social touch-motor and emotional biases on lateral preferences in embracing, cradling and kissing.社会触觉-运动的不对称性和拥抱、抱持和亲吻时的左右偏好的情绪偏见。
Laterality. 2020 May;25(3):325-348. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2019.1690496. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Handedness and sex effects on lateral biases in human cradling: Three meta-analyses.利手性和性别对人类抱持行为中偏侧性的影响:三项荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.035. Epub 2019 Jun 26.