• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe.东南欧低收入和中等收入国家心理社会治疗的可感知可持续性。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 15;8(5):e156. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.539.
2
Implementing a digital mental health intervention for individuals with psychosis - a multi-country qualitative study.实施针对精神病患者的数字化心理健康干预措施——多国定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03466-x.
3
Cost-effectiveness of implementing a digital psychosocial intervention for patients with psychotic spectrum disorders in low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Europe: Economic evaluation alongside a cluster randomised trial.在东南欧中低收入国家实施针对精神谱系障碍患者的数字心理社会干预措施的成本效益:一项集群随机试验的经济评估。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 26;65(1):e56. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2310.
4
5
Effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) in community treatment of patients with psychosis--a cluster randomised controlled trial.以问题解决为导向的结构化医患沟通(DIALOG+)在社区精神分裂症患者治疗中的效果--一项集群随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 26;13:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-173.
6
Improving treatment of patients with psychosis in low-and-middle-income countries in Southeast Europe: Results from a hybrid effectiveness-implementation, pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial (IMPULSE).改善东南欧中低收入国家精神病患者的治疗:一项混合有效性-实施、实用、集群随机临床试验(IMPULSE)的结果。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 10;65(1):e50. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2302.
7
Feasibility, experiences and outcomes of using DIALOG+ in primary care to improve quality of life and mental distress of patients with chronic conditions: an exploratory non-controlled trial in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia and Uganda.在初级保健中使用DIALOG+改善慢性病患者生活质量和精神困扰的可行性、经验及结果:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、哥伦比亚及乌干达的一项探索性非对照试验
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 30;7(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00914-z.
8
The Effectiveness of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution-Focused Approach (DIALOG+) for Patients with Psychosis: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial in Community Care.以问题解决为导向的患者为中心评估(DIALOG+)对精神病患者的疗效:社区护理中的实用集群随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(5):304-13. doi: 10.1159/000430991. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Exploring the Mechanisms of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution Focused Approach (DIALOG+) in the Community Treatment of Patients with Psychosis: A Process Evaluation within a Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial.探索以患者为中心的评估机制:采用聚焦解决方案的方法(DIALOG+)用于社区精神病患者治疗:一项整群随机对照试验中的过程评估
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148415. eCollection 2016.
10
Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) in treatment of patients with chronic depression-study protocol for a multi-site, cluster randomised controlled trial [TACK].一项技术支持和以解决方案为焦点的干预措施(DIALOG+)治疗慢性抑郁症患者的临床和成本效益:一项多中心、集群随机对照试验 [TACK] 的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Mar 28;23(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06181-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' and clinicians' experiences of DIALOG+ in primary health care in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a qualitative interview study using thematic analysis.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那初级卫生保健中患者和临床医生对DIALOG+的体验:一项采用主题分析的定性访谈研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 7;26(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02845-7.
2
Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe - CORRIGENDUM.东南欧低收入和中等收入国家心理社会治疗的可持续性认知——勘误
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 4;9(5):e142. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.18.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a structured intervention to make routine clinical meetings therapeutically effective (DIALOG+) for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A cluster randomised controlled trial.在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,一种使常规临床会议对抑郁和焦虑症患者具有治疗效果的结构化干预措施(DIALOG+)的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Psychiatry Res Commun. 2021 Dec;1(2):None. doi: 10.1016/j.psycom.2021.100010.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks.在中低收入国家实施基于证据的任务分担精神卫生干预措施的障碍和促进因素:使用实施科学框架的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01179-z.
3
Implementing a digital mental health intervention for individuals with psychosis - a multi-country qualitative study.实施针对精神病患者的数字化心理健康干预措施——多国定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03466-x.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based health innovations in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic literature review.低收入和中等收入国家实施循证健康创新的障碍与促进因素:一项系统文献综述
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Oct;82:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101832. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Engaging With a Web-Based Psychosocial Intervention for Psychosis: Qualitative Study of User Experiences.参与基于网络的精神病心理社会干预:用户体验的定性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 19;7(6):e16730. doi: 10.2196/16730.
6
Evidence for efficacy of psychosocial interventions in LMICs.中低收入国家心理社会干预措施有效性的证据。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;7(2):113-114. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30531-0. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for mental health outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: an umbrella review.低收入和中等收入国家心理健康结局的社会心理干预措施的疗效:一项系统综述。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;7(2):162-172. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30511-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Everyday Politics and the Leadership of Health Policy Implementation.日常政治与卫生政策实施的领导力
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jul 2;2(3):187-193. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1217367.
9
Considering culture, context and community in mhGAP implementation and training: challenges and recommendations from the field.在精神、神经和物质使用障碍干预指导项目的实施与培训中考虑文化、背景和社区:来自实地的挑战与建议
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Aug 24;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0312-9. eCollection 2019.
10
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution.可持续发展目标时代的高质量卫生系统:是时候进行一场变革了。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

东南欧低收入和中等收入国家心理社会治疗的可感知可持续性。

Perceived sustainability of psychosocial treatment in low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe.

作者信息

Ribic Emina, Sikira Hana, Dzubur Kulenovic Alma, Pemovska Tamara, Russo Manuela, Jovanovic Nikolina, Radojicic Tamara, Repisti Selman, Milutinović Miloš, Blazevska Biljana, Konjufca Jon, Ramadani Fjolla, Jerotic Stefan, Savic Bojana

机构信息

Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; and WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 15;8(5):e156. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.539.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2022.539
PMID:35968901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9438482/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

DIALOG+ is an evidence-based, generic, cost-saving and easily deliverable psychosocial intervention, adaptable to clinicians' personal manner of interaction with patients. It was implemented in mental health services in five low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe during a 12-month randomised-controlled trial (IMPULSE) to improve the effectiveness of out-patient treatment for people with psychotic disorders.

AIMS

To investigate barriers and facilitators to the perceived sustainability of DIALOG+ that has been successfully implemented as a part of the IMPULSE project.

METHOD

Three months after the IMPULSE trial's end, perceived sustainability of the DIALOG+ intervention was assessed via a short survey of clinicians and patients who took part in the trial. Quantitative data collected from the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics; content analysis assessed qualitative survey data. The views and experiences of key informants (patients, clinicians and healthcare policy influencers) regarding the sustainability and scale-up of DIALOG+ were further explored through semi-structured interviews. These data were explored using framework analysis.

RESULTS

Clinicians mostly appreciated the comprehensiveness of DIALOG+, and patients described DIALOG+ meetings as empowering and motivating. The barrier most commonly identified by key informants was availability of financial resources; the most important facilitators were the clinically relevant structure and comprehensiveness of the DIALOG+ intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants showed a willingness to sustain the implementation of DIALOG+. It is important to maintain collaboration with healthcare policy influencers to improve implementation of DIALOG+ across different levels of healthcare systems and ensure availability of resources for implementing psychosocial interventions such as DIALOG+.

摘要

背景

DIALOG+是一种基于证据、通用、节省成本且易于实施的心理社会干预措施,可适应临床医生与患者互动的个人方式。在一项为期12个月的随机对照试验(IMPULSE)中,它在东南欧的五个低收入和中等收入国家的精神卫生服务中实施,以提高对精神障碍患者门诊治疗的有效性。

目的

调查作为IMPULSE项目一部分已成功实施的DIALOG+在感知可持续性方面的障碍和促进因素。

方法

在IMPULSE试验结束三个月后,通过对参与试验的临床医生和患者进行简短调查,评估DIALOG+干预措施的感知可持续性。从调查中收集的定量数据使用描述性统计进行分析;内容分析评估定性调查数据。通过半结构化访谈进一步探讨关键信息提供者(患者、临床医生和医疗保健政策影响者)对DIALOG+的可持续性和扩大规模的看法和经验。这些数据使用框架分析进行探讨。

结果

临床医生大多赞赏DIALOG+的全面性,患者将DIALOG+会议描述为赋权和激励性的。关键信息提供者最常指出的障碍是财政资源的可用性;最重要的促进因素是DIALOG+干预措施与临床相关的结构和全面性。

结论

参与者表现出维持DIALOG+实施的意愿。与医疗保健政策影响者保持合作很重要,以改善DIALOG+在不同医疗保健系统层面的实施,并确保有资源用于实施如DIALOG+这样的心理社会干预措施。