Ribic Emina, Sikira Hana, Dzubur Kulenovic Alma, Pemovska Tamara, Russo Manuela, Jovanovic Nikolina, Radojicic Tamara, Repisti Selman, Milutinović Miloš, Blazevska Biljana, Konjufca Jon, Ramadani Fjolla, Jerotic Stefan, Savic Bojana
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; and WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 15;8(5):e156. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.539.
DIALOG+ is an evidence-based, generic, cost-saving and easily deliverable psychosocial intervention, adaptable to clinicians' personal manner of interaction with patients. It was implemented in mental health services in five low- and middle-income countries in South-Eastern Europe during a 12-month randomised-controlled trial (IMPULSE) to improve the effectiveness of out-patient treatment for people with psychotic disorders.
To investigate barriers and facilitators to the perceived sustainability of DIALOG+ that has been successfully implemented as a part of the IMPULSE project.
Three months after the IMPULSE trial's end, perceived sustainability of the DIALOG+ intervention was assessed via a short survey of clinicians and patients who took part in the trial. Quantitative data collected from the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics; content analysis assessed qualitative survey data. The views and experiences of key informants (patients, clinicians and healthcare policy influencers) regarding the sustainability and scale-up of DIALOG+ were further explored through semi-structured interviews. These data were explored using framework analysis.
Clinicians mostly appreciated the comprehensiveness of DIALOG+, and patients described DIALOG+ meetings as empowering and motivating. The barrier most commonly identified by key informants was availability of financial resources; the most important facilitators were the clinically relevant structure and comprehensiveness of the DIALOG+ intervention.
Participants showed a willingness to sustain the implementation of DIALOG+. It is important to maintain collaboration with healthcare policy influencers to improve implementation of DIALOG+ across different levels of healthcare systems and ensure availability of resources for implementing psychosocial interventions such as DIALOG+.
DIALOG+是一种基于证据、通用、节省成本且易于实施的心理社会干预措施,可适应临床医生与患者互动的个人方式。在一项为期12个月的随机对照试验(IMPULSE)中,它在东南欧的五个低收入和中等收入国家的精神卫生服务中实施,以提高对精神障碍患者门诊治疗的有效性。
调查作为IMPULSE项目一部分已成功实施的DIALOG+在感知可持续性方面的障碍和促进因素。
在IMPULSE试验结束三个月后,通过对参与试验的临床医生和患者进行简短调查,评估DIALOG+干预措施的感知可持续性。从调查中收集的定量数据使用描述性统计进行分析;内容分析评估定性调查数据。通过半结构化访谈进一步探讨关键信息提供者(患者、临床医生和医疗保健政策影响者)对DIALOG+的可持续性和扩大规模的看法和经验。这些数据使用框架分析进行探讨。
临床医生大多赞赏DIALOG+的全面性,患者将DIALOG+会议描述为赋权和激励性的。关键信息提供者最常指出的障碍是财政资源的可用性;最重要的促进因素是DIALOG+干预措施与临床相关的结构和全面性。
参与者表现出维持DIALOG+实施的意愿。与医疗保健政策影响者保持合作很重要,以改善DIALOG+在不同医疗保健系统层面的实施,并确保有资源用于实施如DIALOG+这样的心理社会干预措施。