Suppr超能文献

糖尿病知识问卷(DKQ)在台湾人群中的效度验证——与糖尿病特异性生活质量问卷模块的同时效度

Validation of Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ) in the Taiwanese Population - Concurrent Validity with Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module.

作者信息

Hsieh Meng-Hsueh, Chen Yu-Ching, Ho Chun-Heng, Lin Chung-Ying

机构信息

Department of Industrial Design, College of Planning and Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Aug 9;15:2391-2403. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S369552. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Diabetes knowledge is important for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) to improve their health. Therefore, it is important to validate an instrument for assessing diabetes knowledge. The present study aimed to validate the 24-item Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 24-item DKQ and Diabetes-specific Quality of Life Module (DMQoL) were administered to 425 patients (mean±SD age=58.4±11.6) with type 2 DM.

RESULTS

The 24-item DKQ was first examined for its factor structure using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Items with low factors loadings were removed and 18 items were retained to make a DKQ-18. In DKQ-18, five factors were identified, which were named as diabetes etiology and symptoms (F1), intermediate nursing (F2), complications (F3), diet and treatment (F4), and elementary nursing (F5). The DKQ-18 had satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.732 and McDonald's ω=0.748), good known-group validity (participants with a higher level of education showed better score in DKQ-18; participants with HbA1c ≤7 had better score in DKQ-18 compared to group of HbA1c level >8.5), acceptable test-retest reliability (r=0.69), adequate responsiveness (DKQ-18 can detect knowledge change), and concurrent validity with DMQoL.

CONCLUSION

The DKQ-18 is a valid measure for assessing diabetes knowledge. The DKQ-18 could evaluate participants' diabetes knowledge and improve their diabetes knowledge and self-care through a diabetes team and serve as a tool to evaluate the knowledge of participants with type 2 DM.

摘要

目的

糖尿病知识对于2型糖尿病(DM)患者改善健康状况至关重要。因此,验证一种评估糖尿病知识的工具很重要。本研究旨在验证24项糖尿病知识问卷(DKQ)。

患者与方法

对425例2型糖尿病患者(平均±标准差年龄=58.4±11.6)进行24项DKQ和糖尿病特异性生活质量模块(DMQoL)评估。

结果

首先使用探索性因素分析(EFA)对24项DKQ的因素结构进行检查。剔除因素负荷低的项目,保留18项形成DKQ-18。在DKQ-18中,确定了五个因素,分别命名为糖尿病病因与症状(F1)、中级护理(F2)、并发症(F3)、饮食与治疗(F4)和基础护理(F5)。DKQ-18具有令人满意的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα=0.732,McDonald'sω=0.748)、良好的已知组效度(教育水平较高的参与者在DKQ-18中的得分更高;糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≤7的参与者在DKQ-18中的得分高于HbA1c水平>8.5的组)、可接受的重测信度(r=0.69)、足够的反应性(DKQ-18可以检测知识变化)以及与DMQoL的同时效度。

结论

DKQ-18是评估糖尿病知识的有效工具。DKQ-18可以评估参与者的糖尿病知识,并通过糖尿病团队提高他们的糖尿病知识和自我护理能力,作为评估2型糖尿病参与者知识的工具。

相似文献

2
Translation and Validation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire in Indonesian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024 Dec;50(6):484-496. doi: 10.1177/26350106241287445. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
3
Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes.
Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Fall;36(4):345-353. doi: 10.2337/ds22-0079. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Urdu Version of Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire.
Front Public Health. 2017 Jun 27;5:139. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00139. eCollection 2017.
6
Adaptation and Validation of the Vietnamese Translated Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire.
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2022;37(1):38-45. doi: 10.15605/jafes.037.01.08. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
9
10
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

2
Diabetes knowledge and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients at public hospitals in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0317288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317288. eCollection 2025.
3
Translation and Validation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire in Indonesian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024 Dec;50(6):484-496. doi: 10.1177/26350106241287445. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
6
Associated Factors Influencing Quality of Life and Knowledge Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;21(2):e090224226838. doi: 10.2174/0115733998284163240129073837.

本文引用的文献

1
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Jan;40(1):10-38. doi: 10.2337/cd22-as01.
2
12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S185-S194. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S012.
3
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S17-S38. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S002.
4
11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S175-S184. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S011.
5
6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S83-S96. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S006.
6
Status of diabetes control and knowledge about diabetes in patients.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2021 Dec;68(10):716-727. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2021.12.003.
7
Importance of medication adherence in treatment needed diabetic retinopathy.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98488-6.
9
Association of health literacy and diabetes self-management: a systematic review.
Aust J Prim Health. 2019 Jan;25(6):526-533. doi: 10.1071/PY19007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验