Pierce J P, Dwyer T, DiGiusto E, Carpenter T, Hannam C, Amin A, Yong C, Sarfaty G, Shaw J, Burke N
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(7):689-95. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90105-6.
A validation study was carried out on self-reported smoking for 1177 people in Sydney and Melbourne in 1983. Because of its long half life and the fact that smoking is its only source in body fluids, saliva cotinine was chosen as the validation measure. Cotinine levels above 250 nmol/l were used to classify people as smokers. The sensitivity of self-reported smoking was 92.6% and the specificity was 93.4%. There was some evidence that people in the process of changing their smoking status might be slow in updating their self-classification. The smoking prevalence estimate based on cotinine levels was found to be 1.7% lower than that for self-reported smoking status. The small proportion of false negatives and false positives suggests that commercially collected data banks can be valid sources of prevalence data. Correlation between cotinine level and reported cigarette consumption was not affected by sample volume, and was similar to that achieved for carbon monoxide and thiocyanate at a low 0.34. Regression analysis using self-reported cigarette consumption filter/non-filter cigarettes, and time since last cigarette as predictors, explained 13.6% of the variance in cotinine level.
1983年,针对悉尼和墨尔本的1177人开展了一项关于自我报告吸烟情况的验证研究。由于唾液可替宁半衰期长,且吸烟是其在体液中的唯一来源,因此选择唾液可替宁作为验证指标。可替宁水平高于250纳摩尔/升的人被归类为吸烟者。自我报告吸烟情况的敏感性为92.6%,特异性为93.4%。有证据表明,处于改变吸烟状态过程中的人在更新自我分类方面可能较慢。基于可替宁水平得出的吸烟流行率估计值比自我报告吸烟状态的流行率低1.7%。假阴性和假阳性的比例较小,这表明商业收集的数据库可以作为流行率数据的有效来源。可替宁水平与报告的香烟消费量之间的相关性不受样本量影响,与一氧化碳和硫氰酸盐的相关性相似,为较低的0.34。使用自我报告的香烟消费量(过滤嘴/非过滤嘴香烟)以及自上次吸烟以来的时间作为预测指标进行回归分析,解释了可替宁水平13.6%的方差。