Kozlowski L T, Heatherton T F, Frecker R C, Nolte H E
Clinical Institute, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Aug;33(4):815-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90476-0.
Blockers of vents in ultra-low-yield cigarettes had higher levels of carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine than did nonblockers. None of the blockers reported that they blocked vents. Exposure differences seemed not to be due simply to vent blocking, but also to be the result of syndromes of heavier (blocking, more cigarettes per day, and starting earlier in the morning) or lighter smoking (not blocking, fewer cigarettes per day, and starting later in the morning). The results are interpreted in light of the boundary model. Cigarette smoking and brand selection should be studied as they occur naturally, as well as in experimentally contrived studies.
超低焦油香烟通风口堵塞者的一氧化碳(CO)和唾液可替宁水平高于未堵塞者。没有一位通风口堵塞者表示他们堵塞了通风口。暴露差异似乎并非仅仅由于通风口堵塞,还可能是重度吸烟(堵塞通风口、每天吸烟更多且早晨开始吸烟更早)或轻度吸烟(不堵塞通风口、每天吸烟更少且早晨开始吸烟更晚)综合征的结果。根据边界模型对结果进行了解释。应研究自然发生的以及实验设计研究中的吸烟和品牌选择情况。