Hao Quanxi, Guo Hui, Li Chuntao, Yang Shuai
School of Foreign Languages, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Department of Foreign Languages, Taiyuan University, Taiyuan, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 1;13:942266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942266. eCollection 2022.
When there is no immediate response after a proposal and normally the silence is longer than 0.2 s, the proposer would take subsequent actions to pursue a preferred response or mobilize at least an articulated one from the recipient. These actions modulate the prior deontic stance embedded in the original proposal into four trends as follows: (1) maintaining the prior deontic stance with a self-repair or by seeking confirmation; (2) making the prior deontic stance more tentative by making a revised other-attentiveness proposal, providing an account, pursuing with a tag question, or requesting with an intimate address term; (3) making the prior deontic stance more decisive by making a further arrangement (for the original proposal), closing the local sequence, or providing a candidate unwillingness account (for the recipient's potential rejection); and (4) canceling the prior deontic stance by doing a counter-like action. Additionally, these trends inherently embody a decisive-to-tentative gradient. This study would penetrate into the phenomena occurring in Mandarin mundane talk with the methodology of Conversation Analysis to uncover the underflow of deontic stance.
当一个提议发出后没有立即得到回应，且通常沉默时间超过0.2秒时，提议者会采取后续行动以寻求一个理想的回应，或者至少促使接受者给出一个明确的回应。这些行动将原本提议中隐含的道义立场调整为以下四种趋势：（1）通过自我修正或寻求确认来维持先前的道义立场；（2）通过提出修订后的关注他人提议、给出解释、用附加疑问句追问或使用亲昵称呼来请求，使先前的道义立场更具试探性；（3）通过进一步安排（针对原提议）、结束当前序列或给出一个关于接受者可能拒绝的不愿接受的理由，使先前的道义立场更具决定性；（4）通过做出类似反驳的行动来取消先前的道义立场。此外，这些趋势本身体现了一个从决定性到试探性的梯度。本研究将运用会话分析方法深入探究普通话日常交谈中出现的这些现象，以揭示道义立场的暗流。
