Research Group Longitudinal and Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5342-5352. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002495. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
The psychological risk factors of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) are not fully understood, but initial evidence points to a potential role of unfavorable cognitive emotion regulation (ER-) strategies. Given the symptom cyclicity of PMDD, ambulatory assessment is ideally suited to capture psychological and physiological processes across the menstrual cycle. Our study examines habitual ER-strategies in women with PMDD and their predictive value for the course of mood and basal cortisol across the cycle in affected women.
Women with and without PMDD ( = 61 each) were compared regarding habitual mindfulness, reappraisal, and repetitive negative thinking (RNT). Momentary affect and cortisol output were assessed over two consecutive days per cycle phase (menstrual, follicular, ovulatory, late luteal).
Women with PMDD reported lower mindfulness, less use of reappraisal and stronger RNT than controls (s < 0.035). In women with PMDD, higher mindfulness and reappraisal and lower RNT predicted decreased negative and increased positive affect across the menstrual cycle (s < 0.027). However, women using more favorable ER-strategies displayed stronger mood cyclicity, resulting in stronger mood deterioration in the late luteal phase, thereby resembling women with more unfavorable ER-strategies toward the end of the cycle. Lower mindfulness predicted lower cortisol in the menstrual phase.
Protective ER-strategies seem to be generally linked to better momentary mood in women with PMDD, but do not appear to protect affected women from premenstrual mood deterioration. Habitual mindfulness, in turn, seems to buffer blunted cortisol activity in women with PMDD, especially in the menstrual phase.
经前期烦躁障碍(PMDD)的心理风险因素尚未完全阐明,但初步证据表明,不利的认知情绪调节(ER)策略可能起作用。鉴于 PMDD 的症状周期性,动态评估非常适合在整个月经周期内捕捉心理和生理过程。本研究检查了 PMDD 女性的习惯性 ER 策略及其对受影响女性情绪和基础皮质醇在整个周期中的变化的预测价值。
比较了 PMDD 患者和非 PMDD 患者(每组 61 例)的习惯性正念、再评价和重复消极思维(RNT)。在每个周期阶段(月经期、卵泡期、排卵期、黄体晚期)的两天内,对瞬间情绪和皮质醇输出进行评估。
与对照组相比,PMDD 患者报告的正念水平较低,再评价使用较少,重复消极思维较多(s < 0.035)。在 PMDD 患者中,较高的正念和再评价水平以及较低的 RNT 预测整个月经周期的负面情绪减少和积极情绪增加(s < 0.027)。然而,使用更有利的 ER 策略的女性表现出更强的情绪周期性,导致黄体晚期情绪恶化更严重,从而类似于周期结束时情绪更不利的 ER 策略的女性。较低的正念预测月经期皮质醇降低。
保护型 ER 策略似乎与 PMDD 女性的即时情绪改善有关,但似乎并不能防止经前情绪恶化。相反,习惯性正念似乎可以缓冲 PMDD 女性皮质醇活动减弱,尤其是在月经期。