Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven,Belgium.
J Phys Act Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(9):623-637. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0196. Print 2022 Sep 1.
The retirement transition constitutes both a risk and an opportunity for changes in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). The present systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the differences between socioeconomic status (SES) groups in changes in PA and SB across the retirement transition.
The authors searched 5 databases. Inclusion criteria were: investigating statutory retirement, measuring PA and/or SB at least once before and once after retirement, and reporting information on SES differences. Results are reported by means of a narrative synthesis, combined with harvest plots based on direction of effect.
We included 24 papers from 19 studies. Sixteen papers focused on PA, 3 on SB, and 5 investigated both. For total PA, occupational PA, and total sedentary time, nearly all publications reported more favorable changes for high SES groups. For recreational PA, active transport, and screen time, there seemed to be a tendency toward more favorable changes for high SES groups. Changes in household/caregiving PA did not appear to differ between SES groups.
Changes in movement behavior during the retirement transition are potentially more favorable for high SES adults. Nonetheless, the differences between SES groups seem to depend on the domain of movement behavior.
退休过渡既构成了体力活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)变化的风险,也构成了机会。本系统评价旨在总结目前关于退休过渡期间 PA 和 SB 变化方面社会经济地位(SES)群体差异的证据。
作者搜索了 5 个数据库。纳入标准为:调查法定退休年龄,在退休前后至少测量一次 PA 和/或 SB,并报告 SES 差异的信息。结果通过叙述性综合报告,结合基于效应方向的收获图进行报告。
我们从 19 项研究中纳入了 24 篇论文。16 篇论文关注 PA,3 篇论文关注 SB,5 篇论文同时关注两者。对于总 PA、职业 PA 和总久坐时间,几乎所有出版物都报告说 SES 较高的群体变化更为有利。对于休闲 PA、主动交通和屏幕时间,SES 较高的群体似乎更倾向于有利的变化。家庭/照顾 PA 的变化似乎在 SES 群体之间没有差异。
退休过渡期间运动行为的变化对 SES 较高的成年人更为有利。然而,SES 群体之间的差异似乎取决于运动行为的领域。