• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态学决定了觅食蜜蜂记忆的价值。

Ecology dictates the value of memory for foraging bees.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.

Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4279-4285.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.062. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.062
PMID:35987212
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9616731/
Abstract

"Ecological intelligence" hypotheses posit that animal learning and memory evolve to meet the demands posed by foraging and, together with social intelligence and cognitive buffer hypotheses, provide a key framework for understanding cognitive evolution. However, identifying the critical environments where cognitive investment reaps significant benefits has proved challenging. Here, we capitalize upon seasonal variation in forage availability for a social insect model (Bombus terrestris audax) to establish how the benefits of short-term memory, assayed using a radial arm maze (RAM), vary with resource availability. Following a staggered design over 2 years, whereby bees from standardized colonies at identical life-history stages underwent cognitive testing before foraging in the wild, we found that RAM performance predicts foraging efficiency-a key determinant of colony fitness-in plentiful spring foraging conditions but that this relationship is reversed during the summer floral dearth. Our results suggest that the selection for enhanced cognitive abilities is unlikely to be limited to harsh environments where food is hard to find or extract, highlighting instead that the challenges of rich and plentiful environments, which present multiple options in short succession, could be a broad driver in the evolution of certain cognitive traits. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

摘要

“生态智能”假说认为,动物的学习和记忆能力是为了应对觅食需求而进化的,与社会智能和认知缓冲假说一起,为理解认知进化提供了一个关键框架。然而,确定认知投资能带来显著收益的关键环境一直具有挑战性。在这里,我们利用社会性昆虫(Bombus terrestris audax)的觅食资源季节性变化的特点,通过在野外觅食之前,使用放射状迷宫(RAM)对短期记忆进行测试,来确定短期记忆的益处如何随资源可用性而变化。我们采用了一种交错设计,历时两年,来自标准化群体的蜜蜂处于相同的生活史阶段,在进行野外觅食之前接受认知测试,结果发现,RAM 表现预测了觅食效率——这是群体适应度的关键决定因素——在丰富的春季觅食条件下,但在夏季花卉稀少时,这种关系则相反。我们的研究结果表明,增强认知能力的选择不太可能仅限于食物难以寻找或提取的恶劣环境,而是强调了丰富而充足的环境所带来的挑战,这些环境会在短时间内呈现出多种选择,这可能是某些认知特征进化的一个广泛驱动力。视频摘要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/d034def52bfe/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/e1810fb9667f/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/82844b17781f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/64218f626358/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/4b4dea6e7025/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/d034def52bfe/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/e1810fb9667f/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/82844b17781f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/64218f626358/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/4b4dea6e7025/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bf/9616731/d034def52bfe/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Ecology dictates the value of memory for foraging bees.生态学决定了觅食蜜蜂记忆的价值。
Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4279-4285.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.062. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection.自由觅食的熊蜂学习速度与一生的资源采集量呈负相关。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 29;7(1):496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00389-0.
3
Seasonal Food Scarcity Prompts Long-Distance Foraging by a Wild Social Bee.季节性食物短缺促使野生群居蜜蜂进行远距离觅食。
Am Nat. 2018 Jan;191(1):45-57. doi: 10.1086/694843. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
4
Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape.大黄蜂与觅食景观相关的飞行距离。
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.x. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
5
Winter active bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) achieve high foraging rates in urban Britain.冬季活跃的熊蜂(Bombus terrestris)在英国城市地区实现了高觅食率。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 5;5(3):e9559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009559.
6
Foraging errors play a role in resource exploration by bumble bees (Bombus terrrestris).觅食错误在熊蜂(Bombus terrestris)的资源探索中起作用。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014 Jun;200(6):475-84. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0905-3. Epub 2014 May 17.
7
Limitation of complementary resources affects colony growth, foraging behavior, and reproduction in bumble bees.补充资源的限制会影响熊蜂的群体生长、觅食行为和繁殖。
Ecology. 2020 Mar;101(3):e02946. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2946.
8
The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees.大黄蜂学习速度与自然觅食成功率的相关性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 7;275(1636):803-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1652.
9
Changes in learning and foraging behaviour within developing bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies.发育中的熊蜂(地熊蜂)蜂群内学习和觅食行为的变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090556. eCollection 2014.
10
Colour learning when foraging for nectar and pollen: bees learn two colours at once.在觅食花蜜和花粉时的颜色学习:蜜蜂能同时学习两种颜色。
Biol Lett. 2015 Sep;11(9):20150628. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0628.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the limits of delay of gratification in bumble bees.评估大黄蜂延迟满足的限度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08616-9.
2
Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.将个体适应性与认知进化联系起来。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0122.
3
Evolution of diverse (and advanced) cognitive abilities through adaptive fine-tuning of learning and chunking mechanisms.通过学习和组块机制的适应性微调实现多样(且高级)认知能力的进化。

本文引用的文献

1
Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era.有序分位数归一化:一种为交叉验证时代构建的半参数变换。
J Appl Stat. 2019 Jun 15;47(13-15):2312-2327. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372. eCollection 2020.
2
Redefining Single-Trial Memories in the Honeybee.在蜜蜂中重新定义单次试验记忆。
Cell Rep. 2020 Feb 25;30(8):2603-2613.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.086.
3
Natural Selection and Spatial Cognition in Wild Food-Caching Mountain Chickadees.自然选择与野生食籽山雀的空间认知
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240117. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0117.
4
How does cognition determine an individual's fitness? A systematic review of the links between cognition, behaviour and fitness in non-human animals.认知如何决定个体的适应性?对非人类动物认知、行为与适应性之间联系的系统综述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240118. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0118.
5
Selection shapes diverse animal minds.选择塑造了多样的动物思维。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240108. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0108.
6
What could evolve in the evolution of memory?在记忆的进化过程中会发生什么演变?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240109. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0109.
7
Pollinator cognition in a plant network.植物网络中的传粉者认知
Biol Lett. 2025 May;21(5):20250044. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2025.0044. Epub 2025 May 28.
8
What maintains variation in flower accessibility to pollinators in plant communities? A simulation study.是什么维持了植物群落中花朵对传粉者可及性的差异?一项模拟研究。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2025 May 9;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12862-025-02380-0.
9
Pair-bond strength is consistent and related to partner responsiveness in a wild corvid.在一种野生鸦科动物中,配偶关系强度是稳定的,且与伴侣的反应性有关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Feb;292(2040):20242729. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2729. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Spatiotemporal dynamics of locomotor decisions in .运动决策的时空动态……(原文不完整,翻译可能不太准确,你可补充完整原文以便更精确翻译)
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 5:2024.09.04.611038. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.04.611038.
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 18;29(4):670-676.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.测量和理解认知的个体差异。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0280.
5
Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution.推断人类大脑大小进化的生态和社会驱动因素。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):554-557. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0127-x. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
Bee cognition.蜜蜂的认知能力。
Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 9;27(19):R1049-R1053. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.008.
7
Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality.灵长类动物的脑容量是由饮食而非社交性决定的。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 27;1(5):112. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0112.
8
Foraging Cognition: Reviving the Ecological Intelligence Hypothesis.觅食认知:复兴生态智能假说。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Sep;21(9):691-702. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection.自由觅食的熊蜂学习速度与一生的资源采集量呈负相关。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 29;7(1):496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00389-0.
10
Pollen foraging by bumblebees: Foraging patterns and efficiency on Lupinus polyphyllus.熊蜂采集羽扇豆花粉:采集模式与效率
Oecologia. 1984 Feb;61(2):249-253. doi: 10.1007/BF00396768.