Fernández Da Silva Ángela, Buceta Bran Barral, Mahou-Lago Xosé María
Department of Sociology, Political Science and Administration, and Philosophy, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Department of Political Science and Sociology, Faculty of Political Science and Administration, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 15;8:20552076221120724. doi: 10.1177/20552076221120724. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
In recent years, the healthcare sector has experienced accelerated progress in terms of the inclusion of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in its procedures and formalities. However, public administrations have been unable to adapt to the peculiarities of the most vulnerable groups. This leads to marginalization of at-risk groups within the healthcare system and contributes to the widening of the so-called digital divide.
Based on the analysis of the literature, three dimensions have been constructed to identify the level of inclusion of web portals: the perception of quality, the perception of usability, and the importance attributed to their content. In order to obtain data on each of these dimensions, a study was designed based on the user test methodology as a central element (identifying and evaluating 11 vulnerable groups) and, in parallel, a survey of the general population and heuristic tests.
A high percentage of vulnerable people at risk of social exclusion are not receiving adequate healthcare due to the digitalization of the system and the implementation of scarcely inclusive health web portals, which pose significant barriers in service provision for the 11 selected collectives. Meanwhile, the general population is being introduced to eHealth benefits, although the latter did not have high levels of digitization or a broad portfolio of services.
The general population has a relatively positive perspective of eHealth services, but only a minority of them make intensive use of them, and they are not widespread in Spain as a whole. Meanwhile, the population at risk of exclusion lacks the skills and resources to make real use of eHealth, needing "digital intermediaries" from the social sphere to achieve results. eHealth policies are not taking into account people with higher levels of marginalization, aggravating their exclusion and the digital divide.
近年来,医疗保健部门在将信息通信技术(ICT)纳入其程序和手续方面取得了加速进展。然而,公共管理部门一直未能适应最弱势群体的特殊情况。这导致医疗保健系统中高危群体被边缘化,并加剧了所谓的数字鸿沟。
在对文献进行分析的基础上,构建了三个维度来确定门户网站的纳入水平:质量感知、可用性感知以及赋予其内容的重要性。为了获取这些维度中每个维度的数据,设计了一项以用户测试方法为核心要素的研究(识别和评估11个弱势群体),同时,对普通人群进行了调查并开展了启发式测试。
由于系统数字化以及几乎不具有包容性的健康门户网站的实施,很大比例有社会排斥风险的弱势群体无法获得充分的医疗保健,这对11个选定群体的服务提供构成了重大障碍。与此同时,普通人群正在接触电子健康福利,尽管后者的数字化程度不高且服务种类有限。
普通人群对电子健康服务的看法相对积极,但只有少数人大量使用这些服务,并且它们在整个西班牙并不普遍。与此同时,面临排斥风险的人群缺乏实际利用电子健康的技能和资源,需要社会领域的“数字中介”来取得成效。电子健康政策没有考虑到边缘化程度较高的人群,加剧了他们的排斥和数字鸿沟。