• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Offerings and User Demands of eHealth Services in Spain: National Survey.西班牙电子健康服务的提供与用户需求:全国性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 18;25:e42304. doi: 10.2196/42304.
2
eHealth Literacy and the Use of NHS 111 Online Urgent Care Service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey.电子健康素养与英格兰 NHS111 在线紧急护理服务的使用:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 4;26:e50376. doi: 10.2196/50376.
3
Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives.欧洲医生与患者之间的在线交流:现状与展望。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jun 15;12(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1281.
4
Electronic Health Use in the European Union and the Effect of Multimorbidity: Cross-Sectional Survey.欧盟电子健康的使用及多重疾病的影响:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 3;20(5):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7299.
5
Unlocking the eHealth professionals' career pathways: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council countries.解锁电子健康专业人员的职业发展路径:以海湾合作委员会国家为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104914. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Modelling and Predicting eHealth Usage in Europe: A Multidimensional Approach From an Online Survey of 13,000 European Union Internet Users.欧洲电子健康使用情况的建模与预测:基于对13000名欧盟互联网用户的在线调查的多维方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(7):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5605.
7
eHealth and mHealth Development in Spain: Promise or Reality?西班牙的电子健康和移动医疗发展:是承诺还是现实?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13055. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413055.
8
Characteristics of Online Health Care Services From China's Largest Online Medical Platform: Cross-sectional Survey Study.中国最大在线医疗平台的在线医疗服务特征:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 15;23(4):e25817. doi: 10.2196/25817.
9
Determinants of access to eHealth services in regional Australia.澳大利亚区域内获得电子健康服务的决定因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Nov;131:103960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103960. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs.通过电子健康素养提高以消费者为中心的健康信息技术系统的有效性:理解用户需求的框架
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 May 20;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.3696.

引用本文的文献

1
The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.波兰对电子健康解决方案使用的促进因素和障碍的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x.
2
Failures and fallacies of eHealth initiatives: Are we finally able to overcome the underlying theoretical and practical orthodoxies?电子健康计划的失败与谬误:我们最终能否克服潜在的理论和实践正统观念?
Digit Health. 2024 May 15;10:20552076241254019. doi: 10.1177/20552076241254019. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
eHealth tools use and mental health: a cross-sectional network analysis in a representative sample.电子健康工具的使用与心理健康:对一个代表性样本的横断面网络分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 2;14(1):5173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55910-z.
4
Information and Communication Technology Medicine: Integrative Specialty for the Future of Medicine.信息通信技术医学:医学未来的综合专业。
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Jul 13;12:e42831. doi: 10.2196/42831.

本文引用的文献

1
eHealth and mHealth Development in Spain: Promise or Reality?西班牙的电子健康和移动医疗发展:是承诺还是现实?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13055. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413055.
2
The Impact of Gamification-Induced Users' Feelings on the Continued Use of mHealth Apps: A Structural Equation Model With the Self-Determination Theory Approach.游戏化引发的用户情感对移动医疗应用持续使用的影响:基于自我决定理论的结构方程模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 12;23(8):e24546. doi: 10.2196/24546.
3
Mobile Electronic Devices as Means of Facilitating Patient Activation and Health Professional Empowerment Related to Information Seeking on Chronic Conditions and Medications: Qualitative Study.移动电子设备作为促进慢性病和药物信息查询中患者激活和卫生专业人员赋权的手段:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 11;9(8):e26300. doi: 10.2196/26300.
4
Usage of eHealth/mHealth Services among Young Czech Adults and the Impact of COVID-19: An Explorative Survey.《捷克青年成年人对电子健康/移动医疗服务的使用情况以及 COVID-19 的影响:一项探索性调查》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;18(13):7147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137147.
5
eHealth solutions to fight against COVID-19: A scoping review of applications.抗击新冠疫情的电子健康解决方案:应用的范围综述
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Apr 1;35:43. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.43. eCollection 2021.
6
Equity policies in health plans: accessibility and something more?健康计划中的公平政策:可及性及更多?
Rev Saude Publica. 2021 May 28;55:31. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002560. eCollection 2021.
7
Enablers for and barriers to using My Kanta - A focus group study of older adults' perceptions of the National Electronic Health Record in Finland.使用 My Kanta 的促进因素和障碍 - 芬兰老年人对国家电子健康记录看法的焦点小组研究。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Dec 2;46(4):399-411. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1902331. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Healthcare inequities and barriers to access for homeless individuals: a qualitative study in Barcelona (Spain).无家可归者的医疗保健不平等和获取障碍:巴塞罗那(西班牙)的一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01409-2.
9
Predictors of Adherence in Three Low-Intensity Intervention Programs Applied by ICTs for Depression in Primary Care.三种应用于初级保健中抑郁的低强度干预项目的 ICT 依从性预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041774.
10
Surgery and the Smartphone: Can Technology Improve Equitable Access to Surgical Care?手术与智能手机:技术能否改善手术护理的公平可及性?
J Surg Res. 2021 Jul;263:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.066. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

西班牙电子健康服务的提供与用户需求:全国性调查。

Offerings and User Demands of eHealth Services in Spain: National Survey.

机构信息

Department of Political Science and Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Department of Sociology, Political Science and Administration, and Philosophy, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 18;25:e42304. doi: 10.2196/42304.

DOI:10.2196/42304
PMID:37200072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10236285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accelerated development of information and communication technologies has made health care one of the pioneering fields in the incorporation of these tools. As new technologies have been applied, existing technologies have been sophisticated and improved and the concept of eHealth has expanded. However, these advances and expansion of eHealth do not seem to have served to adapt the supply of services to users' demands; rather, supply seems to be governed by other variables.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this work was to review the existing differences between user demands and the supply of eHealth services in Spain and their causes. The aim is to provide information on the level of use of the services and the causes of the variation in demand for these services, which can be useful in correcting existing differences and adapting them to the needs of users.

METHODS

A survey, "Use and Attitudes Toward eHealth in Spain," was applied by telephone to a sample of 1695 people aged 18 years and over, taking into account sociodemographic profile characteristics (sex, age, habitat, educational level). The confidence level was set at 95% and the margin of error was ±2.45 for the whole sample.

RESULTS

The survey results showed that the online doctor's appointment service is the most frequently used eHealth service by users: 72.48% of respondents used this service at some point and 21.28% stated that they use it regularly. The other services showed significantly lower percentages of use, including "managing health cards" (28.04%), "consulting medical history" (20.37%), "managing test results" (20.22%), "communicating with health professionals" (17.80%), and "requesting a change of doctor" (13.76%). Despite this low usage, a large majority of respondents (80.00%) attach great importance to all the services offered. Overall, 16.52% of the users surveyed were willing to make new service requests to the regional websites, with 9.33% of them highlighting services such as "the availability of a complaints and claims mailbox," "the possibility of consulting medical records," and "the availability of more detailed information on medical centers (location, medical directory, waiting lists, etc)." Other outstanding requests (8.00%) were to simplify the procedures for using certain existing services.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from the survey show that eHealth services are widely known and highly valued by users, but not all services are used with the same frequency or intensity. It appears that users find it difficult to suggest new services that might be useful to them in terms of demand for new services that do not currently exist. It would be useful to use qualitative studies to gain a deeper understanding of currently unmet needs and the possibilities of eHealth. The lack of access to and use of these services and the unmet needs particularly affect more vulnerable populations who have the greatest difficulty in meeting their needs through alternative means to eHealth.

摘要

背景

信息和通信技术的飞速发展使医疗保健成为采用这些工具的先驱领域之一。随着新技术的应用,现有技术得到了完善和改进,电子健康的概念也得到了扩展。然而,这些电子健康的进步和扩展似乎并没有使服务的供应适应用户的需求;相反,供应似乎受到其他变量的控制。

目的

本工作的主要目的是回顾西班牙现有的用户需求与电子健康服务供应之间的差异及其原因。目的是提供有关服务使用水平和对这些服务需求变化的原因的信息,这对于纠正现有差异并使其适应用户需求可能是有用的。

方法

通过电话对 1695 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的人进行了一项名为“西班牙电子健康使用和态度”的调查,考虑了社会人口统计学特征(性别、年龄、居住地、教育水平)。置信水平设定为 95%,整个样本的误差幅度为±2.45。

结果

调查结果表明,在线预约医生服务是用户最常使用的电子健康服务:72.48%的受访者曾使用过该服务,21.28%的受访者表示他们经常使用该服务。其他服务的使用率明显较低,包括“管理健康卡”(28.04%)、“查询病历”(20.37%)、“管理化验结果”(20.22%)、“与卫生专业人员交流”(17.80%)和“请求换医生”(13.76%)。尽管使用率较低,但绝大多数受访者(80.00%)非常重视提供的所有服务。总体而言,16.52%的被调查用户愿意向地区网站提出新的服务请求,其中 9.33%的用户强调了“提供投诉和索赔邮箱”、“查询病历的可能性”和“提供更多详细的医疗中心信息(位置、医疗目录、等待名单等)”等服务。其他突出的请求(8.00%)是简化某些现有服务的使用程序。

结论

调查数据显示,电子健康服务为用户所熟知且深受其重视,但并非所有服务的使用频率或强度都相同。用户似乎难以提出对他们有用的新服务建议,而这些新服务在目前并不存在。使用定性研究来更深入地了解当前未满足的需求和电子健康的可能性将是有益的。这些服务的获取和使用不足以及未满足的需求特别影响到弱势群体,他们通过电子健康以外的替代手段满足需求的难度最大。